Abstract: BACKGROUND: Corpus callosum is the most important commissure of the brain and therefore represents a first-choice candidate to challenge hypotheses of disrupted inter-hemispheric connectivity and white matter pathology in patients with schizophrenia. Recent studies on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of corpus callosum yielded promising but equivocal evidence of reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in schizophrenia patients who were, for the most part, chronic cases on medication for a lengthy period of time. To exclude potentially confounding effects of the course of the disorder and its treatment, we compared callosal FA of first-contact, antipsychotic drug-naive schizophrenia patients (n=21) and healthy controls (n=21). METHODS: Splenium and genu FA were obtained by two independent observers utilizing large, rectangular, tractography-guided regions of interest outlined on directional color-coded maps. Inter-observer agreement on FA was evaluated by means of the Bland and Altman and the Passing and Bablok procedures together with an estimate of the intra-class correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Strong inter-observer agreement of FA values emerged from each of the three statistical approaches utilized. ANCOVA showed a significant effect on FA for the interaction between patient-control membership and callosal region (F=5.354; p=0.026); post hoc multiple comparisons demonstrated that, when compared to the controls, the patients had lower mean FA values (p=0.005) in the splenium but not in the genu and that this difference tended to be more evident in males (p=0.090). CONCLUSIONS: Lowered mean FA values in the splenium of first-contact, antipsychotic drug-naive patients with respect to healthy controls strongly support the hypothesis that processes operant at least since the earliest phases of the disorder and independent from exposition to antipsychotic drugs contribute to reduced anisotropy in schizophrenia.
Abstract: This 18-week, randomized, flexible-dose, double-blind, double-dummy trial evaluated ziprasidone as an alternative to clozapine in treatment-refractory schizophrenia patients. Patients had a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, a history of resistance and/or intolerance to at least three acute cycles with different antipsychotics given at therapeutic doses, PANSS score >/=80, and CGI-S score >/=4. Patients were randomized to ziprasidone (80-160 mg/day, n=73) or clozapine (250-600 mg/day, n=74). On the primary ITT-LOCF analysis, baseline-to-endpoint decreases in PANSS total scores were similar in the ziprasidone (-25.0+/-22.0, 95% CI -30.2 to -19.8) and clozapine (-24.5+/-22.5, 95% CI -29.7 to -19.2) groups. A progressive and significant reduction from baseline in PANSS total score was observed from day 11 in both study arms. There were also significant improvements on PANSS subscales, CGI-S, CG-I, CDSS, and GAF, without between-drug differences. The two treatment groups had similar rates of early discontinuations due to AEs. AEs were mostly of similar mild-moderate severity in the two groups. There were also no detrimental effects on prolactin, renal and liver function, hematology, and cardiovascular parameters. However, ziprasidone but not clozapine showed a significant reduction of SAS and AIMS scores. Moreover, when compared with clozapine, ziprasidone also had a more favorable metabolic profile, with significant endpoint differences in weight, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In conclusion, this trial indicates that both ziprasidone and clozapine, having comparable efficacy coupled with satisfactory general safety and tolerability, may be regarded as valuable options for the short-term treatment of difficult-to-treat schizophrenia patients with a history of multiple resistance and/or intolerance to antipsychotics. The more favorable metabolic profile of ziprasidone may represent an added value that could guide clinicians, at least in the presence of patients at high risk for metabolic disorders.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recent data have suggested few differences in the cognitive effects of antipsychotic medications. However, assessment of such effects can be complex, due to a number of factors. Clozapine has previously shown greater clinical and lesser cognitive benefits than other atypicals. This study compared the cognitive benefits of clozapine and ziprasidone in schizophrenia patients (n=130) with a history of either failure to respond to or intolerance of previous adequate antipsychotic treatments. METHODS: Patients were randomized (double-blind) to either clozapine or ziprasidone in a single country (Italy), multi-site trial. The cognitive assessments examined episodic memory (RAVLT), executive functioning (Stroop test), and processing speed (Trail-making test (TMT) Parts A and B). RESULTS: Analyses found statistically significant within-group improvements for ziprasidone in learning and delayed recall on the RAVLT and on TMT Parts A and B. Clozapine-treated patients improved on the RAVLT, but not on the TMT. A composite cognitive score improved from baseline in both groups, but the improvements were significantly larger in the ziprasidone group (p=.029). IMPLICATIONS: These results indicated that cognitive functioning improved following treatment with ziprasidone in patients with a history of either treatment resistance or intolerance, and that the effects are comparable or greater than those observed with clozapine. One interpretation of these findings is that clozapine treatment interferes with the performance benefits associated with practice.
Abstract: ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: There is evidence of a link between schizophrenia and a deficit of working memory, but this has been derived from tasks not specifically developed to probe working memory per se. Our aim was to investigate whether working memory deficits may be detected across different paradigms using the self-ordered pointing task (SOPT) and the visual conditional associative learning task (VCALT) in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and healthy controls. The current literature suggests deficits in schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients versus healthy controls but these studies frequently involved small samples, broad diagnostic criteria, inclusion of patients on antipsychotic medications, and were not controlled for symptom domains, severity of the disorder, etc. To overcome some of these limitations, we investigated the self-monitoring and conditional associative learning abilities of a numerically representative sample of healthy controls and a group of non-deteriorated, drug-free patients hospitalized for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder with florid, mainly positive psychotic symptoms. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia (n=71) or schizophreniform disorder (n=14)) and 80 healthy controls entered the study. The clinical picture was dominated by positive symptoms. The healthy control group had a negative personal and family history of schizophrenia or mood disorder and satisfied all the inclusion and exclusion criteria other than variables related to schizophrenia spectrum disorders. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients had worse performances on SOPT, VCALT and higher SOPT/VCALT ratios, not affected by demographic or clinical variables. ROC curves showed that SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT ratio had good accuracy in discriminating patients from controls. The SOPT and VCALT scores were inter-correlated in controls but not in patients. CONCLUSION: The selection of a clinically homogeneous group of patients, controlled for a number of potential confounding factors, and the high level of significance found in the different analyses confirm the presence of SOPT and VCALT abnormalities in a large preponderance of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder with positive symptoms. SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT ratio showed good accuracy in discriminating patients from healthy controls. These conclusions cannot be extended to schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients with a different clinical profile from our patient population.
Abstract: An increasing body of evidence suggests a role for the immune system in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. The information concerning the effects of antipsychotics on cytokine profiles are limited and often controversial in particular regarding novel antipsychotics. The authors first investigated the production of various cytokines [interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-10, interferon (INF)-gamma] in drug-free (n = 12) and drug-naive (n = 3) schizophrenic patients and in healthy controls (n = 33) and then the modifications of cytokines values during a 3-month period of treatment with risperidone. In the baseline condition, the production of IL-2 and INF-gamma was significantly higher (P = .023 and .026, respectively) in patients than in controls. In the same patients, the use of risperidone was associated with augmented IL-10 (a suppressor of Type I cytokines) and decreased INF-gamma production. This modification suggests that clinical improvement is associated with a reduction in the inflammatory-like situation present in not currently treated schizophrenic patients.
Abstract: A large body of evidence concerning immunological abnormalities in schizophrenic patients seems to suggest a role of the immune system in the multifactorial pathogenesis of schizophrenia.We investigated the production of various cytokines [interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-10, interferon (INF)-gamma] in drug-free (n=26) and drug-naive (n=7) schizophrenic patients and in healthy controls (n=33). Production of IL-2 and INF-gamma was significantly higher (respectively P=0.021 and P=0.001) in patients than in controls.These findings provide further evidence that immunological abnormalities are present in some schizophrenic patients.
