Abstract: AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In recent years, preoperative chemoradiation has received growing interest for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In an attempt to improve resectability and disease control, we used preoperative radiation therapy and concomitant 5-fluorouracil in a combined modality therapy protocol. The aim of the study was to evaluate definitive results in terms of toxicity, response and clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with unresectable (cT4, 19 patients) or resectable (cT3, 9 patients) nonmetastatic pancreatic tumors received radiotherapy (39.6 Gy) plus 5-fluorouracil (continuous infusion, days 1-4 at 1000 mg/m(2)/day). After 4 weeks, patients were evaluated for surgical resection. In 9 resected patients, electron-beam intra-operative radiotherapy (10 Gy) was given before reconstruction. Thereafter, in resected patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed. RESULTS: During chemoradiation, 1 patient (3.6%) developed grade 3 acute gastrointestinal toxicity and 2 patients (7.1%) developed grade 3 hematological toxicity. Three of 19 patients with unresectable tumors had tumor downstaging (15.8%). Two patients showed partial response (response rate, 7.1%; 95% CI, 0.2-25.3) and 4 patients (14.3%) had minimal tumor response. Four patients (14.3%) showed progressive disease after chemoradiation. One postoperative death was recorded. The median survival time was 11.3 months (20.5 and 9.0 months in resected and unresected patients, respectively). Only one local failure was recorded in 8 patients resected with negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: Although the response rate is still low, our preliminary results suggest that preoperative 5-fluorouracil chemoradiation is well tolerated and may result in tumor downstaging. Delivery of intra-operative radiotherapy seems to be associated with a low rate of local recurrences.

Abstract: A 2D array (PTW, type 10024), equipped with 729 vented plane parallel ion-chambers, has been calibrated as a detector for the in vivo comparison between measured and predicted portal doses for head-neck tumors. The comparison of absolute portal doses measured to ones predicted by a commercial treatment planning system within the field of view of the CT scanner, can help the delivered dose verification during different treatment fractions, in particular when the patient's present weight loss. This paper reports the preliminary results of the comparison of the portal doses measured by a PTW 2D array during several radiotherapy fractions and the predicted portal doses for seven patients undergoing head-neck tumor radiotherapy. The gamma index analysis supplied an agreement of more than 95% of the dose-point P(gamma)>95% within acceptance criteria, in terms of dose difference, DeltaD(max), and distance-agreement, Deltad(max), equal to 5% and 4mm, respectively. After the third week, one patient showed a decrease of P(gamma) values due to the markedly reduced patient's thickness. Even if the spatial resolution of the 2D array was 1cm, there were two advantages in the use of this 2D array as a portal dose device for IMRT quality control. The first one was the use of a stable and efficient absolute dosimeter for in vivo verification, although its construction and behavior for other gantry angles need to be tested, and the second one was the time efficiency in verifying the correct dose delivery in several fractions of the therapy. This study presents acceptance criteria for the comparison of TPS-predicted portal dose images with in vivo 2D ion-chamber measurements for IMRT. In particular, portal dose measurements offer clues for additional studies as to which indicators can signal the need for replanning during treatment.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term effects of chemoradiation and intraluminal brachytherapy in terms of local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and symptom relief in patients with unresectable or residual extrahepatic biliary carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients with unresectable (17 patients) or residual (5 patients) nonmetastatic extrahepatic bile tumors received external beam radiation therapy (39.6-50.4 Gy) between 1991 and 1997. In 21 patients, 5-fluorouracil (96-h continuous infusion, Days 1-4, 1,000 mg/m2/day) was administered. Twelve patients received a boost of intraluminal brachytherapy with 192Ir wires (30-50 Gy) 1 cm from the source axis. RESULTS: During external beam radiotherapy, 10 patients (45.4%) developed Grade 1 to 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. In patients with unresectable tumor who could be evaluated, the clinical response was 28.6% (4 of 14). Two patients showed complete response. In all 22 patients, median durations of local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 44.5 months, 16.3 months, and 23.0 months, respectively. Two patients who received external beam radiation therapy and intraluminal brachytherapy developed late duodenal ulceration. In patients with unresectable tumors, median survival was 13.0 months and 22.0 months in those treated with and without brachytherapy, with 16.7% and no 5-year survival, respectively (p=0.607). Overall 5-year survival was 18.0%: 40% and 11.7% in patients treated with partial resection and in those with unresectable tumor, respectively (p=0.135). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the role of concurrent chemoradiation in advanced biliary carcinoma; the role of intraluminal brachytherapy boost remains to be further analyzed in larger clinical trials.

Abstract: A new 2D array Seven 29T model (PTW, Freiburg), equipped with 729 vented plane-parallel ion chambers, projected for pretreatment verification of radiotherapy plans, was used as a detector for the transmitted or portal dose measurements below a Rando phantom. The dosimetric qualities of the 2D array make it attractive for measuring transmitted dose maps from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). It is well known that for step-and-shoot IMRT beams that use a small number of monitor units (MUs) per sequence, the early and recent electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) present a different response at X-ray start-up that affects the accuracy of the measured transmitted dose. The comparison of portal doses measured to those calculated by a commercial treatment-planning system (TPS) can verify correct dose delivery during treatment. This direct validation was tested by irradiating a simulated head tumor in a Rando anthropomorphic phantom by step-and-shoot IMRT beams. The absolute transmitted doses on a plane orthogonal to the beam central axis below the phantom were measured by the 2D array calibrated in terms of dose to water and compared with the computed portal dose extracted by custom software. In a previous paper, the comparison between the IMRT portal doses, computed by a commercial TPS and measured by a linear array that supplied a 1 mm spatial dose resolution, was carried out. The gamma-index analysis supplied an agreement of more than 95% of the dose point with acceptance criteria, in terms of dose difference, DeltaDmax, and distance agreement, deltadmax, equal to 4% and 4 mm, respectively. In this paper, we verify the possible use of the PTW 2D array for measurements of the transmitted doses during several fractions of head and neck tumor radiotherapy. There are two advantages in the use of this 2D array as a portal dose device for the IMRT quality assurance program: first is the ability to perform absolute dose comparisons for hundreds of measurement positions to verify the correct dose delivery in several fractions of the therapy; second is the efficiency in time to detect these kinds of dose distributions within the field of view area of the CT scanner.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The combination of irradiation and total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma has significantly lowered the incidence of local recurrence. However, a new problem is represented by the patient with locally recurrent cancer who has received previous irradiation to the pelvis. In these patients, local recurrence is very often not easily resectable and reirradiation is expected to be associated with a high risk of late toxicity. The aim of this multicenter phase II study is to evaluate the response rate, resectability rate, local control, and treatment-related toxicity of preoperative hyperfractionated chemoradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer in patients previously irradiated to the pelvis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with histologically proven pelvic recurrence of rectal carcinoma, with the absence of extrapelvic disease or bony involvement and previous pelvic irradiation with doses < or =55 Gy; age > or =18 years; performance status (PS) (Karnofsky) > or =60, and who gave institutional review board-approved written informed consent were treated by preoperative chemoradiation. Radiotherapy was delivered to a planning target volume (PTV2) including the gross tumor volume (GTV) plus a 4-cm margin, with a dose of 30 Gy (1.2 Gy twice daily with a minimum 6-h interval). A boost was delivered, with the same fractionation schedule, to a PTV1 including the GTV plus a 2-cm margin (10.8 Gy). During the radiation treatment, concurrent chemotherapy was delivered (5-fluorouracil, protracted intravenous infusion, 225 mg/m(2)/day, 7 days per week). Four to 6 weeks after the end of chemoradiation, patients were evaluated for tumor resectability, and, when feasible, surgical resection of recurrence was performed between 6-8 weeks from the end of chemoradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed to all patients, using Raltitrexed, 3 mg/square meter (sm), every 3 weeks, for a total of 5 cycles. Patients were staged using the computed tomography (CT)-based F-classification (F0: no side-wall involvement; F1, F2, F3: 1, 2, and 3-4 side-walls involved, respectively). Toxicity was evaluated on the basis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (38 male, 21 female; median age, 62 years; range, 43-77 years) were enrolled in the study, by 12 different Italian radiotherapy departments. Previous surgery was anterior resection in 45 patients (76.3%) and abdominal-perineal resection in 14 patients (23.7%); previous radiotherapy dosage ranged between 30 and 55 Gy (median, 50.4 Gy); the median interval between prior radiation therapy to the onset of reirradiation was 27 months (range, 9-106 months); 44 patients (74.6%) had received some form of previous chemotherapy (concurrent and/or adjuvant). Fifty-one of 59 patients (86.4%) completed chemoradiation without treatment interruptions: 6 patients (10.2%) had temporary treatment interruption due to toxicity or patient compliance, and 2 patients (3.4%) had definitive treatment interruption. The incidence of Grade 3 lower gastrointestinal acute toxicity was only 5.1%. No patient developed Grade 4 acute toxicity. After chemoradiation, 5 patients (8.5%) had complete response (CR), 21 patients (35.6%) had partial response (PR), 31 patients (52.6%) had no change (NC) and 2 patients (3.4%) showed progressive disease (PD). Overall, the response rate (PR + CR) was 44.1% (95% confidence interval, 29.0-58.9%). Twenty of 24 patients (83.3%) with pelvic pain before treatment had symptomatic response. Tumor resection was performed in 30 of 59 patients (50.8%) including 2 local excisions, 4 anterior resections, 18 abdominoperineal resections, and 6 other. Surgical resection resulted as R0 and R1 in 21 patients (35.6%) and 3 patients (5.1%), respectively. The possibility of radical resection was influenced by tumor response to chemoradiation (PD/NC: 7/33; PR/CR: 14/26; p = 0.009). Thirty-three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, which was completed in 30 (50.8%). At a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 9-69 months), 28 patients (47.5%) developed local recurrence or tumor progression in the unresected pelvic disease and 18 patients (30.5%) developed distant metastasis. Seven patients showed late toxicity, including 2 skin fibrosis, 2 impotence, 2 urinary complications requiring nephrostomy, and 1 small bowel fistula requiring surgical diversion. Overall median survival was 42 months. Five-year actuarial survival was 39.3%; 66.8% in R0 resected patients and 22.3% in patients treated without surgery or undergoing subtotal tumor removal. Local control and disease-free survival were significantly correlated with the interval between surgical treatment for primary tumor and local recurrence (p = 0.028 and p = 0.003, respectively). Radical resection significantly influenced local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival (p = 0.010, p = 0.010, and p = 0.050 respectively). The multivariate analysis confirmed the impact of surgery-relapse interval on local control (p = 0.016) and disease-free survival (p = 0.002), and confirmed the correlation between R0 surgery with local control and disease-free survival (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Use of hyperfractionated chemoradiation was associated with a low rate of acute toxicity and an acceptable incidence of late complications. Pain control was excellent. The overall 5-year survival was 39%. Despite 87.4% of patients having F1-3 stage disease, approximately one-third (35%) achieved R0 resection, and two-thirds of patients in this cohort of patients were alive at the 5-year mark. However, further studies using innovative treatment algorithms are warranted to, hopefully, improve the local tumor response and control.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between tumor regression grade (TRG) and outcomes in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Specimens from 144 patients with cT3,4 rectal cancer who had received preoperative radiation +/- chemotherapy and had a minimum follow-up of 3 years were retrospectively reviewed. TRG, which involves examining the residual neoplastic cells and scoring the degree of both cytological changes, including nuclear pyknosis or necrosis and/or eosinophilia, as well as stromal changes, including fibrosis (either dense or edematous) with or without inflammatory infiltrate and giant-cell granulomatosis around ghost cells and keratin, was quantified in five grades according to the Mandard score (Cancer 1994;73:2680-2686). The greater the response, the lower the TRG score. The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 40-143 months). RESULTS: Of the 144 patients, 19% were TRG1, 12% were TRG2, 21% were TRG3, 46% were TRG4, and 1% were TRG5. To simplify the analysis, TRG was combined into two groups: TRG1-2 and TRG3-5. By univariate analysis, none of the pretreatment factors examined, including age, circumference, length, distance from the anorectal ring, pretreatment T and N stage, and INDpre (defined as the pretreatment reference index size based on digital rectal examination), had an impact on 5-year outcomes, including local control, metastases-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Postoperative parameters, including pathologic T stage (pT), pathologic N stage (pN), and TRG, did significantly influence 5-year outcomes. These included local failure: pT0-2: 5% vs. pT3-4: 19%, p = 0.007; pN0: 7% vs. pN1-3: 26%, p = 0.002; TRG1-2: 2% vs. TRG3-5: 17%, p = 0.013; metastasis-free survival: pT0-2: 86% vs. pT3-4: 62%, p = 0.005; pN-: 86% vs. pN*: 42%, p < 0.001; TRG1-2: 91% vs. TRG3-5: 66%, p = 0.004; disease-free survival: pT0-2: 83% vs. pT3-4: 54%, p = 0.001; pN0: 80% vs. pN1-3: 39%, p < 0.001; TRG1-2: 91% vs. TRG3-5: 58%, p < 0.001; and overall survival: pT0-2: 85% vs. pT3-4: 65%, p = 0.007; pN0: 86% vs. pN1-3: 45%, p < 0.001; TRG1-2: 89% vs. TRG3-5: 68%, p = 0.004. By multivariate analysis combining all pre- and posttreatment parameters, only pN (p < 0.001) and TRG (p = 0.005) significantly predicted disease-free survival. Furthermore, TRG predicted the incidence of pathologic nodal involvement (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: By univariate analysis, TRG is a predictor for local failure, metastases-free survival, and overall survival. By multivariate analysis, it predicts improved disease-free survival. Given the ability of TRG to predict those patients with N* disease, it may be helpful, in combination with other clinicopathologic factors, in selecting patients for a more conservative procedure, such as local excision rather than radical surgery, after preoperative therapy.

Abstract: A 46-year-old female patient, with mild cholestasis by a large papillary cholangiocarcinoma involving the left hepatic duct, received intraluminal brachytherapy (50 Gy at 1 cm from the source axis) with the aim to relieve biliary obstruction without stent positioning. The patient presented with haemobilia and vegetant lesions in the left main biliary duct, and thus she had a high risk of early stent obstruction. Eighteen months after the treatment the patient presented tumour progression in the controlateral hepatic lobe, but had a patent left hepatic duct, without signs of cholestasis and/or cholangitis. Based on this and other published reports, intraluminal brachytherapy may be tested in a setting different from standard setting with the aim to safely palliate jaundice in patients with intraductal tumour growth in the biliary tract.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The importance of pancreatic cancer staging is uncertain. The aim of this report was to evaluate the accuracy of combined standard imaging techniques in predicting the pathologic stage and to evaluate the prognostic effect of clinical staging to identify patient groups in which laparoscopy and laparotomy could be beneficial. METHODS: Fifty-four patients were included in this analysis. The techniques used for clinical staging were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, abdominal computed tomographic scan, and ultrasonography. All patients underwent both clinical and surgical/pathologic staging. A comparison was performed between presurgical stage and surgical/pathologic stage. The prognostic effect of different factors on survival was evaluated with both univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox) analysis. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for vascular involvement were 73.9% and 96.3%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for nodal involvement were 63.6% and 95.4%, respectively. A total of 33.3% of patients showed a higher than expected pathologic stage, and 3.7% showed a lower than expected pathologic stage, by comparing clinical and pathologic evaluation. A highly significant correlation was observed between clinical T stage (P = .0067) and tumor diameter (P = .0037) and patient survival. Maximal prognostic differentiation was observed by dividing patients into two groups based on imaging results: group A (favorable prognosis) and group B (unfavorable prognosis). The median survival was 25.1 and 8.0 months for group A and B, respectively. Five-year survival was 20.1% and 0%, respectively (multivariate analysis: P = .0007). CONCLUSIONS: Integrated standard imaging studies achieved reasonable diagnostic accuracy in our analysis. A single classification based on clinical stage and tumor diameter evaluated by imaging predicts prognosis in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Abstract: Lymphedema represents one of the major problem of morbidity in breast cancer therapy. Approximately 15-30% of patients show more or less severe lymphedema of the arm, following cancer therapy. Main pathogenetic mechanisms, risk factors, main grading criteria and scales as LENT-SOMA, CTCv2, CTCAE v3 are presented. A close correlation has been documented between the extent of axillary dissection and the association with radiotherapy in determining an increased risk of lymphedema. Details of surgery and radiotherapy are relevant in the definition of the risk of edema of the arm. Because the axillary area does not correspond to an organ, evaluable parameters as V20 and Dmean available for other organs are not applicable. There is some evidence of a correlation between the irradiation volume and the development of lymphedema. Data of the impact of the dose and its fractionation on the development of lymphedema are contrasting. The monitoring system of late toxicity used by the authors is presented.

Abstract: The multifactorial genesis of radiation-induced fibrosis makes a general outline of the occurence of this late toxicity fairly unpredictable. Scientific knowledge about dose fractionation, irradiated volume, total time, conformation procedures including IMRT can help provide better treatments. Chemical and physical therapies aimed at the removal of fibrosis are still limited or under study. The system of monitoring late toxicity used by the authors is presented.

Abstract: PURPOSE: A Phase I-II dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the possible impact of the dose on response, toxicity, pain relief, and outcome in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 50 patients entered the study. The external beam radiotherapy (RT) dose was 39.6 Gy in the first 15 patients, 50.4 Gy in the next 15 patients, and 59.4 Gy in the remaining 20 patients, at five 1.8-Gy fractions weekly. During external beam RT, patients received concurrent continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1-4 and 21-24). Patients were evaluated for toxic reactions, local disease control, survival, and pain relief. RESULTS: No treatment-related deaths occurred from acute toxicity. Four patients required a temporary treatment interruption because of acute hematologic (2 patients) or GI (2 patients) toxicity, not correlated with the delivered RT dose. Three patients (6%) developed late toxicity (duodenal ulcer in 2 and duodenal stenosis in 1). All patients who developed late toxicity had received a dose of 59.4 Gy. At univariate analysis, only the RT dose correlated significantly with the incidence of late toxicity (at 2 years, 39.6-50.4 Gy resulted in 0% and 59.4 Gy resulted in 58.2%; p = 0.023). At multivariate analysis, the RT dose also showed a trend with the incidence of late side effects (p = 0.052). Overall, 6 patients had a partial response (12%) and 44 (88%) had no change. The overall response rate was 8.0% (95% confidence interval, 1.5-20.5%). The rate of response was not different in the three groups. In-field locoregional disease progression was seen in 7 patients (14.0%). Distant relapse was documented in 34 patients (68.0%). None of analyzed variables, in particular, the RT dose delivered, showed a statistically significant correlation with objective response, local control, incidence of metastasis, disease-free survival, or overall incidence of pain symptoms after therapy. The whole group median survival was 9 months. The actuarial survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 31.3%, 2.8%, and 0.0%, respectively. None of analyzed parameters correlated significantly with survival at univariate or multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In a Phase I-II study, the association of high RT doses with the incidence of severe toxicity in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma was confirmed. Furthermore, this dose-escalation study did not document a clearcut correlation, using 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation, between the radiation dose and clinical outcome.

Abstract: A case is reported of a 54-year-old female patient undergoing the resection of a pancreatic carcinoma with intraoperative radiation therapy (10 Gy) on the tumor bed and subsequent external beam radiotherapy (50 Gy). After surgery the patient presented chronic diarrhea resistant to oral pancreatic enzymes. Twenty-five months postoperatively, mesenteric vein thrombosis was diagnosed after an episode of melena and was treated with conservative therapy. At five-year follow-up the patient had no evidence of neoplastic disease and bowel movements had increased. On imaging examinations, the presence of venous collaterals and cavernous appearance of the portal trunk were documented.

Abstract: AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Clinical studies published in the last decade have shown the possible improvement in prognosis of patients with prostatic carcinoma undergoing radiation therapy with dose escalation or in combination with hormone therapy. However, in studies on hormone therapy, moderate doses of radiation therapy have been used, whereas in studies with high-dose radiotherapy, hormone therapy usually was not administered. Therefore, it is not clear whether the concomitant use of high doses and prolonged hormone therapy could determine an additional beneficial effect. The aim of the present study was therefore to evaluate the relative prognostic role of different dose levels (< 70 versus > or = 70 Gy) of external beam radiotherapy and of different hormone therapies (neoadjuvant only versus neoadjuvant + adjuvant). METHODS: A total of 426 patients (median age, 71 yrs; range, 51-87 yrs) underwent external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy median dose to prostate volume +/- 45 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes) and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (bicalutamide for 30 days; goserelin, 3.6 mg every 28 days starting two months before radiotherapy and for its entire duration). Dose to the prostate was < 70 Gy in 44.8% of patients and > or = 70 Gy in 55.2%. A total of 244 patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy. The distribution according to the clinical stage was 48.1% T2 and 51.9% T3. The distribution according to the Gleason score was 14.3% grades 2-4, 66.7% grades 5-7 and 19.0% grades 8-10. The distribution according to pretreatment prostate-specific antigen levels (in ng/mL) was 7.0% for 0-4, 29.3% for 4-10, 30.3% for 10-20, and 33.3% for > 20. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 1-151), 81 patients (19.0%) showed biochemical recurrence, 17 patients (4.0%) showed local disease progression, and 12 patients (2.8%) showed distant metastases. Overall, 23 patients (5.4%) showed disease progression. Four patients (0.9%) died. At the time of this writing, no patient has died from prostatic carcinoma. At univariate analysis, the radiation dose delivered to the tumor and the administration of adjuvant hormone therapy were shown to be significantly correlated with biochemical disease-free survival. At multivariate analysis, the single parameter significantly correlated with biochemical disease-free survival was the radiation dose delivered to the tumor. In the subset of patients not treated with adjuvant hormone therapy, there was a significant correlation between radiation dose and biochemical disease-free survival at univariate and multivariate analysis. A similar correlation between adjuvant hormone therapy and biochemical disease-free survival was observed in the subset of stage cT3 patients at univariate and multivariate analysis. In patients undergoing combined treatment without adjuvant hormone therapy, a significant correlation was observed between clinical stage and biochemical disease-free survival, at univariate and at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study confirmed the positive impact of radiotherapy doses > 70 Gy and of adjuvant hormone therapy in patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma. Owing to the lack of evidence of a correlation between radiation dose and biochemical outcome in patients undergoing prolonged hormone therapy, the role of further dose escalation in patients undergoing combined hormone and radiation therapy is still unclear.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of preoperative chemoradiation with raltitrexed (Tomudex(1)) on tumor response, sphincter preservation, and toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2002, 54 consecutive patients with Stage T3 or T2N+ resectable rectal carcinoma were treated with preoperative chemoradiation, i.v. bolus of raltitrexed on Days 1, 19, and 38 and concurrent 50 Gy external beam radiotherapy. Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after the end of chemoradiation. RESULTS: No patients had Grade 4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 16.6% of cases and was hematologic in 6 patients and GI in 2. The overall clinical response rate was 88.8%, with a complete response in 5.5%, partial response in 83.3%, and no change in 9.2%. No patient showed disease progression. All patients underwent surgery. Sphincter saving was obtained in 83.3% of patients. No perioperative mortality occurred, and the perioperative morbidity rate was 5.5%. Of 20 resected patients (37%) who were candidates for abdominoperineal resection at diagnosis (anorectal ring distance < or =30 mm), 13 (65%) underwent a sphincter-saving procedure. At pathologic examination, 13 (24%) of 54 patients had a complete pathologic response (pT0) and 10 (18.5%) had rare isolated residual cancer cells (pT, microscopic foci). Overall, 42.5% had major downstaging. The tumor regression grade (TRG), using Mandard's score system, was also applied and was TRG1 in 13 patients, TRG2 in 11, TRG3 in 20, and TRG4 in 10 patients; no patient had TRG5. CONCLUSION: The use of raltitrexed in a neoadjuvant chemoradiation schedule promoted high pathologic tumor downstaging and use of a sphincter-saving procedure. The low toxicity profile supports the rationale to explore raltitrexed combined with other drugs with different biologic targets.

Abstract: Surgery remains the main procedure for rectal cancer therapy. However, in the past decades various radiation therapy modalities were used to improve outcomes. The optimization of the clinical results of radiotherapy alone with concomitant boost or hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy or chemoradiation requires a better understanding of biological evidences on RT effect, considering the possible presentation of this tumor: "visible" unresectable, "visible" resectable and subclinical disease. Furthermore, parameters as tumor volume, hypoxic fraction, intrinsic radiosensitivity, doubling time and clonogen proliferation are factors shown to have an impact on tumor control probability.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Two separate studies were conducted, the first to evaluate the maximal tolerated dose and the second the efficacy of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin in conjunction with preoperative chemoradiation in patients with resectable T3 rectal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 48 patients received radiotherapy (50 Gy) administered to the posterior pelvis 5 d/wk for 5 weeks. Combination raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (60 to 130 mg/m(2)) was administered on Days 1, 19, and 38. RESULTS: The recommended dose of oxaliplatin is 130 mg/m(2) (maximal tolerated dose not reached). No patients developed Grade 4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 9 patients (18.7%). It was hematologic in 1 patient and GI in 1 patient; 7 patients had an asymptomatic increase of transaminase. Surgery was performed in 47 (98%) of 48 patients. Of the 47 patients, 42 underwent sphincter-saving surgery; in 19, the tumor at diagnosis was located <30 mm from the anorectal ring. Chemoradiation in combination with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin produced high rates of tumor response. The overall tumor downstaging rate was 73% for T and N stages. A complete pathologic tumor response (pT0) or microscopic tumor foci (pTmic) was observed in 28 patients. The tumor regression grade (TRG), using the Mandard scoring system, was TRG1 in 16 patients (43.2%), TRG2 in 12 (32.4%), TRG3 in 12 (32.4%), TRG4 in 6 (16.2%), and TRG5 in 1 patient (2.7%). CONCLUSION: Raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin combined with pelvic radiotherapy was effective and well tolerated in patients with resectable T3 rectal carcinoma.

Abstract: Radiotherapy is one of the therapeutic options for nonmetastatic prostate carcinoma. Its outcomes seem superior to simply "wait-and-see" and comparable with those of radical prostatectomy. However, in locally advanced tumors the outcomes are not completely satisfactory. Therefore, in the last decades, numerous studies aimed at the optimization of therapy have been performed. The combination with hormonal therapy and dose escalation have allowed better clinical results. The effect of adjuvant hormonal therapy is well evident especially in phase III studies where the improvement both in biochemical relapse-free survival, cause-specific and overall survival, was documented. As for the effect of dose-escalation, at present, the improvement is limited to the biochemical disease-free survival, when considering the randomized studies. Both strategies seem unnecessary in low-risk patients while the advantages are evident in patients with intermediate-high-risk disease. In case of intermediate risk, dose escalation seems particularly effective while in high risk disease adjuvant hormonal therapy seems more advantageous. The role of dose escalation in this category is discussed, considering that many patients have no more a localized disease. The possibility of further improved clinical outcomes based on the combination of the two strategies is uncertain. Non conventional fractionations and hypofractionation in particular are still under experimentation and their utility has not been established as yet.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes achieved in 2 groups of patients with cT3 prostatic carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant hormonotherapy and neoadjuvant hormonotherapy plus adjuvant hormonotherapy with external beam radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with cT3N0M0 prostatic carcinoma underwent radiotherapy to pelvic lymph nodes (45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction) with a booster dose (65-70 Gy) to the prostatic cavity. Forty-four patients received neoadjuvant hormonotherapy (goserelin, starting 2 months before radiotherapy and continuing until the end of irradiation); 56 patients received neoadjuvant hormonotherapy plus adjuvant goserelin until disease progression, if present. RESULTS: Patients undergoing adjuvant hormonotherapy as compared to those who received exclusive neoadjuvant therapy showed a higher reduction in PSA level below 1.0 ng/ml (p = 0.0211), a lower incidence of biochemical failures (p = 0.0170), a lower incidence of hematogenous metastases (p = 0.0320) and a trend suggestive of a better disease-free survival (p = 0.0660). At univariate analysis (logrank), Gleason score did not show a significant correlation with any of the end points analyzed. To the contrary, patients with tumor <15 mm showed a better local control (p = 0.0347) and biochemical failure-free survival (p = 0.0102). Furthermore, a trend between initial PSA level and incidence of hematogenous metastases was observed (p = 0.0519). Patients with a posttreatment PSA level <1.0 ng/ml had a lower incidence of metastases (p = 0.0237) and a better survival (p = 0.0178); patients with complete clinical response showed a lower incidence of biochemical failures (p = 0.0469). Radiotherapy doses >70 Gy showed a trend with biochemical failure-free survival (p = 0.0554). At multivariate analysis, a correlation between Gleason score and incidence of metastases (p = 0.0232), and between tumor diameter and local control (p = 0.0178) and biochemical failure-free survival (p = 0.0290) was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cT3N0M0 prostate carcinoma, prolonged hormonotherapy was shown to be significantly correlated with biochemical failure-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival. Furthermore, tumor size had a significant impact on biochemical failure-free survival as well as on local control.

Abstract: Unplanned gaps in radiotherapy can impact on its clinical effect, especially in tumors with accelerated repopulation. In the literature, several technical solutions have been proposed. According to the situation, compensation for the effect on the tumor to the detriment of normal tissue tolerance can be achieved. An approach, modulated according to the gap duration and timing is proposed aimed at constant tumor control with no significant increased risk of side-effects. The decisional algorithm and calculation formulae are used in our center in teaching addressed to residents to make them familiar with the possible clinical applications of radiobiological knowledge.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The rationale for combining cytotoxic agents, such as gemcitabine, and radiotherapy is based on their ability to act as radiation sensitizers and to improve overall response rate. Several studies on pancreatic or biliary carcinoma evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine when combined with irradiation of the macroscopic tumor. However, most of these neoplasms metastasize to the regional lymph nodes. Aim of this report is to determine the MTD of weekly gemcitabine when combined with extended field irradiation (tumor plus nodal irradiation). PATIENTS AND METHOD: 15 patients entered the study. Of these 5 patients were treated with chemoradiation after radical surgical resection. External beam radiation (ERT) was delivered to the tumor (or tumor bed) and regional lymph nodes by using a three-field technique. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 100 mg/m(2) administered as short intravenous infusion once a week. At each dose level 3 patients were treated, and if no grade 3-4 toxicity (considered as dose-limiting toxicity, DLT) was recorded, dose escalation was applied with 50 mg/m(2) increments until the MTD was established. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for acute toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. No DLT occurred at the first 4 dose levels (100-250 mg/m(2)). At the 5th dose level (300 mg/m(2)), 3 patients experienced DLT: 1 had grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (painful erosion of gastric mucosa), 1 had uncomplicated grade 3 leukopenia and 1 grade 3 change in liver biochemistry tests. In addition, all 10 unresected patients were evaluated for response, 4 of whom had progressive disease (1 local; 2 distant; 1 local and distant) and 6 had no change. The median follow-up was 21 months. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, the recommended dose for weekly short infusional gemcitabine combined with radiation therapy to the tumor and lymph nodes is 250 mg/m(2). This value is suggestive of a correlation between acute toxicity and inclusion of lymph nodes in the irradiated volume. Moreover, different infusion modalities, as continuous infusion gemcitabine, should be tested more accurately.

Abstract: AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The case of a 70-year-old patient with resectable, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is presented. PATIENT AND METHODS: Due to intraoperative hemorrhagic complications, surgical resection was not feasible. The patient was treated with radiochemotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy; 1.8 Gy/fraction; 5 fractions/week) plus 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v. infusion, days 2-5, week 1 and 5 of radiotherapy) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 i.v., day 2, week 1 of radiotherapy). RESULTS: At five years' follow-up the patient was in good general condition, without any signs of disease according to CT scan, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and tumor marker determination. Multiple random biopsies performed in the ampullary region were negative for tumor growth. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ampullary carcinoma the use of concurrent chemoradiation should be considered, particularly when surgical resection is unfeasible due to medical contraindications or locally advanced disease.

Abstract: AIM: To evaluate, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma undergoing concomitant chemoradiation, the impact of pretreatment hemoglobin (Hb) concentration on the outcome in terms of clinical response, local control, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients undergoing concomitant chemoradiation (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], 1,000 mg/m(2)/day, continuous i.v. infusion days 1-4 of radiotherapy) and external beam radiotherapy (50.4-59.4 Gy) were divided into two groups based on pretreatment median Hb value (11.5 g/dl). The potential prognostic factors examined besides Hb concentration were: tumor site (head vs body-tail), sex (female vs male), cN (cN0 vs nC1), dose of external beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy vs 59.4 Gy), presence of jaundice at diagnosis (yes vs no), weight loss at diagnosis (> or = 5 kg vs < 5 kg), epigastric-lumbar pain at diagnosis (yes vs no), maximum tumor diameter (< 40 mm vs > or = 40 mm). RESULTS: Pretreatment Hb ranged between 9.6 and 15.0 g/dl. No statistically significant differences were observed as for clinical response and local control between patients with an Hb < or = 11.5 g/dl and those with an Hb > 11.5 g/dl. Metastasis-free survival was 5.1 months in patients with an Hb < or = 11.5 g/dl and 10.7 months in patients with an Hb > 11.5 g/dl (p = 0,010). Median actuarial disease-free survival was 5.1 and 10.2 months in patients with an Hb < or = 11.5 and > 11.5 g/dl, respectively (p = 0.026). Median actuarial overall survival was 7.5 and 10.3 months in patients with an Hb < or = 11.5 and > 11.5 g/dl; respectively (p = 0.039). On multivariate analysis, Hb concentration at diagnosis was the only factor prognostically correlated with metastasis-free survival (p = 0.026), disease-free survival (p = 0.032), and overall survival (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: In a group of patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma treated with chemoradiation, a significant correlation was observed between pretreatment Hb levels and metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Patients with unresectable, locally advanced rectal cancer are reported to have a dismal prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of combined-modality therapy on clinical outcome. METHODS: From March 1990 to December 1997, 43 patients (28 males; median age, 62 years; median follow-up, 74 months) with locally advanced (T4 and/or N3) nonmetastatic rectal cancer received external-beam radiation (23.6 plus 23.6 Gy (split course), 8 patients; 45 Gy, 35 patients) plus 5-fluorouracil (96-hour continuous infusion, Days 1-4, at 1,000 mg/m(2)/day) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m, intravenous bolus, Day 1). Concomitant chemotherapy was repeated at the beginning of the second course (split-course group) or in the last week of radiotherapy (continuous-course group). After 6 to 8 weeks, patients were evaluated for surgical resection and intraoperative radiation therapy (10 to 15 Gy). Thereafter, adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin, 6-9 courses) was prescribed. RESULTS: During chemoradiation, 5 patients (11.6 percent) developed Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity. After chemoradiation, 29 patients (67.4 percent) had an objective clinical response (complete response, 2.3 percent; partial response, 65.1 percent). Thirty-eight patients underwent radical surgery (anterior resection, 24 patients; abdominoperineal resection, 14 patients; intraoperative radiation therapy boost on the tumor bed, 19 patients), and 2 patients had partial tumor resection. No perioperative deaths occurred in the patient group. Five-year survival and local control rates were 59.9 and 69.1 percent, respectively. Distant metastasis occurred in 44.2 percent of patients. Statistically significant relationships between intraoperative radiation therapy and local control (P = 0.0104), radical surgery and survival (P = 0.0120), and adjuvant chemotherapy and disease-free survival (P = 0.0112) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that combined-modality therapy was relatively well tolerated and resulted in good local control and survival. With regard to the impact of surgical resection on survival, additional studies aimed at improving the local response rate are necessary, whereas the positive impact of intraoperative radiotherapy on local control appears to justify the inclusion of this therapeutic modality in prospective multi-institutional trials.

Abstract: The prostate lymphatics drain into the periprostatic subcapsular network, from which 3 groups of ducts originate: the ascending ducts from the cranial prostate draining into the external iliac lymph nodes, the lateral ducts running to the hypogastric lymph nodes and the posterior ducts draining from the caudal prostate to the subaortic sacral lymph nodes of the promontory. Internal, external iliac and obturator lymph nodes are the most frequently involved by prostate carcinoma. Metastases to presacral and common iliac lymph nodes are rare. For the limited staging accuracy, present indications for seminal vesicle irradiation and pelvic node prohylactic irradiation are essentially based on risk categories and estimation algorithms; the latter while are widely used in international studies are not free of limitations as stressed since they were introduced. A method to deliver high doses to the tumor while limiting the irradiation of critical organs might be the delivery of a boost to the tumor only. This approach could become increasingly feasible with the diffusion of imaging procedures able to better define tumor extension.

Abstract: CTV definition in exclusive or adjuvant radiation therapy of pancreatic carcinoma is essentially based on the opinion of "expert" authors and on the knowledge of lymphatic pathways. The subject has been widely debated. Radiotherapy treatments of the entire upper abdomen (liver and pancreatic region), pancreas and lymph node stations, to volumes focused on macroscopic tumor only, have been proposed. Carcinoma of exocrine pancreas is characterized by the frequent, early appearance of metastasis via the lymphatic route. Most commonly involved lymph node stations include those of the celiac trunk, superior mesenteric, peripancreatic, lumboaortic lymph nodes, those of the hepatic portal (the latter in particular for pancreatic head tumors) and of the hilum of spleen (the latter in particular for pancreatic tail tumors). The possible multicentricity of pancreatic carcinoma, most likely due to intraductal spread, should lead to the inclusion in the CTV of the entire pancreatic parenchyma. This should be considered also for the frequent perineural intra- or extrapancreatic spread of pancreatic carcinoma present also in small tumors (T1). In extrapancreatic spread the retropancreatic adipose tissue should be included in the CTV at least at the GTV level. At the present state of knowledge, in the absence of pattern of failure analysis and of comparison of different treatment approaches, in terms of the definition of volumes of interest, CTV definitions which include lymphatic drainage stations, most part of pancreatic parenchyma and retropancreatic adipose tissue seem justified especially in treatments for cure. In palliation, the CTV may be limited to the GTV and the adipose tissue behind it.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a short radiation treatment (30 Gy, 3.0 Gy/fraction) had analgesic efficacy in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: Twelve patients were included in this analysis. Before starting and at four weeks after radiation therapy, pain intensity was evaluated and analgesic drug therapy was adjusted until a 0-3 pain score was reached (WHO). RESULTS: No radiotherapy interruptions, no hospitalisation due to toxic reactions, and no severe toxicity were observed. Six patients (50%) had pain control without pharmacological therapy, three patients (25%) reduced their use (35%-72%) of analgesics, while in the remaining three patients (25%) there was no change in analgesic use. Overall, mean reduction in the use of analgesics was 63.1% +/- 43.8%. During follow-up (44 months), two patients (16.7%) showed a worsening of pain that required increased analgesia; in one patient, percutaneous splanchnicectomy was necessary. CONCLUSION: In patients excluded from standard concomitant chemoradiation, hypofractionated-accelerated radiotherapy is feasible and results in pain relief in most patients, documented as a reduced need for analgesics.

Abstract: Pain control in patients with cancer represents a significant aspect of radiation therapy practice. Radiation therapy is one of the most effective, and often the only, therapeutic option to relieve pain caused by nerve compression or infiltration by malignant tumor, pain from liver and bony metastases and it provides also successful palliation of dysphagia caused by oesophageal carcinoma and of pain due to pancreatic cancer. Various instruments are avaliable for pain evaluation but a valid methodology to assess the pain status in the patient with cronic cancer pain is still an important clinical problem. In this complex and wide scene this contribution wants to confirm the role of radiotherapy in cancer pain control, in paricular in bone metastases, and to involve the patient himself in the survey of radiation treatement response by a subjective evaluation of bone pain, elaborating a reliable and valid unidimensional method by which recording the self-rating of the patient's sensation. Materials and Methods For the subjective evaluation of pain caused by bone metastases we used an application form with which drawing information in the course of time in terms of: response to the treatment, duration of symptom relief and quality of life. Results Considering as cut-off a dose of 30 Gy, which is commonly considered the conventional treatment for bone metastases, the partial and complete response were, respectively, of 54% and 30% in the patients treated with dose higher than or equal to 30 Gy, and 60% and 20% in the ones treated with doses lower than 30 Gy. In the whole, in 84 patients, the global response was of 82%, in accordance with literature. Conclusion In this retrospective study, the analysis of patient's subjective experience confirmed the effectiveness of radiotherapy in reducing pain caused by bone metastases and in improving quality of life of the patient himself. Given the conflicting opinions on low-dose short-course radiotherapy versus prolonged or higher dose schedules on initial pain relief, we are going to define categories of homogenous patients on whom starting treatment schedules with the aim or of palliation of the symptom or of the functional restitutio, on the base of the expectation and the quality of life.

Abstract: In the last two decades there was a radical change in radiotherapy setup. The growing availability of CT equipment and console for computer-aided treatment planning setup enabled the use of advanced technologies as conformal 3D radiation therapy in most centers. In particular in 1987 virtual simulation was proposed for setup. During its use a number of application modalities appeared. Virtual simulation in some centers is applied alone while in others it is associated with conventional simulation. However, from numerous reports published in last years it seems that virtual simulation significantly improves treatment quality independently of radical or palliative intent and of the size of treated volumes (high doses to small volumes or wide shaped fields). Some studies stressed that virtual simulation could significantly shorten treatment planning times with consequent cost reduction. The use of virtual simulation evidenced associated problems and in particular setup limitations due to the CT gantry size, the need to up-date the conventional modalities of setup verification according to the new technologies and more generally to up-date quality assurance procedures in an advanced technological setting. Finally there was the self-evident need of a better knowledge of the anatomy on axial sections, of tumor spread routes in particular.

Abstract: Cervical carcinoma is one of the most frequent gynecological malignancies. Literature shows that while the rate is exceedingly low in systematically screened populations, the incidence remains high because of large populations of at-risk women--particularly in underserved nations and in medically indigent subpopulations of Western nations--who are not screened. Recently, a series of randomized trials has demonstrated the possibility to dramatically improve the prognosis of these patients by using concurrent chemoradiation. In particular, concurrent chemoradiation represents a major treatment option in patients with bulky IB-IIA disease, IIB-IVA disease and resected IB-IIA disease with poor prognostic factors. However, further studies are necessary to optimize treatment schedules and particularly to define the best drug combination to be used during radiation therapy, improve patients selection by the analysis of anatomical (TNM stage) and non-anatomical (tumor oxygenation, genetic markers, tumor angiogenesis) prognostic factors, explore novel treatment strategies, such as use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced tumors, integration of antiangiogenetic therapies in chemoradiation schedules, use of supportive treatments aimed to overcome tumor hypoxia, to evaluate the possibility of 'cure' of locally recurrent tumors by chemoradiation and finally to define the best 'second-line' treatment for patients failing after chemoradiation with or without surgery.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Conformal therapy of prostate cancer is based on high-dose irradiation to the entire prostate gland. The aim of this study was to analyze the pattern of intraprostatic recurrence in patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at a dose of 65-70 Gy to evaluate whether conventional radiotherapy doses are adequate to control microscopic disease outside the primary tumor and therefore whether high-dose irradiation can be exclusively focused on the macroscopic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical and radiologic reports of 118 patients with prostate cancer undergoing EBRT (64.8-70.2 Gy) combined with hormonal therapy were evaluated. In all patients, before and after therapy, the size and site of the primary neoplasm within the prostate were assessed by clinical examination and imaging studies. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 45 months (range 14-119), the 5-year actuarial local control rate was 83.9%. Twelve patients had an intraprostatic recurrence, with the appearance of a new nodule (in 5 patients with a complete response after therapy) or increased nodular size compared with the minimal size (in the 7 other patients). In all patients, on the basis of a semiquantitative evaluation of the site of recurrence, this was shown to originate within the initial tumor volume. CONCLUSION: The results of this analysis seem to confirm some histologic findings observed in patients undergoing prostatectomy for local recurrence after radiotherapy that suggest that local recurrence usually originates in the primary tumor rather than in focal prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. This observation might justify the application of conformal therapy procedures aimed at identifying the gross tumor volume, in the phase of boost, exclusively with the primary tumor.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcome of intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) in the duct of Wirsung in patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients (eight men, one woman; mean age 72.4 +/- 9.1, range 52 - 80) with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the head or body underwent ERCP for biliary and/or pancreatic stent placement and placement of a nasopancreatic drain with/without nasobiliary drain. The ILBT dose administered was 30 - 50 Gy calculated at 1 cm from the iridium-192 wire axis. Seven patients received ILBT from the duct of Wirsung whereas two patients received dual-duct ILBT (duct of Wirsung and the common bile duct). Three patients received combined-modality treatment (ILBT with external beam radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil). The patients were prospectively followed up. RESULTS: No endoscopy-related complications occurred. No radiation-related toxicity occurred in patients treated with ILBT alone. One patient undergoing combined-modality treatment developed gastric bleeding. Intraluminal source dislodgement occurred in three patients. Obvious tumor mass reduction of greater than 50 % was seen in three patients at 8 weeks after brachytherapy. Median survival was 11 months (range 6 - 37 months) and the 1-year and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 44 % and 15 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraluminal brachytherapy in the duct of Wirsung in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma is safe and feasible. Further clinical trials are warranted.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of tumor response; tumor and nodal downstaging; and cTNM, yTNM (clinical stage after chemoradiation, based on preoperative imaging), and pTNM classifications on long-term outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based concurrent chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1990 and March 1998, 165 consecutive patients with locally advanced extraperitoneal cancer of the rectum were treated with preoperative chemoradiation. Four patients had a cT2 lesion (2.5%), 120 had a cT3 lesion (74.5%), and 41 had a cT4 lesion (23%). The nodal involvement at combined imaging was cN0 in 21%, cN1 in 41%, cN2 in 34%, and cN3 in 4%. Preoperative chemoradiation was delivered according to 1 of 3 schedules: (1) FUMIR-T3 (from 1990 to 1995) for patients with cT3N0-2 or cT2N1-2 rectal carcinoma (82 patients): 37.8 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) plus 5-FU, 1 g/m(2)/d on Days 1-4, continuous infusion, and mitomycin-C, 10 mg/m(2)/d on Day 1; (2) FUMIR-T4 (from 1990 to 1999) for patients with cT4N0-3 or cT3-4N3 rectal carcinoma (40 patients): 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) plus 5-FU, 1 g/m(2)/d on Days 1-4 and 29-32, continuous infusion, and mitomycin-C, 10 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1 and 29; and (3) PLAFUR-4 (from 1995 to 1998) for patients with cT3N0-2 or cT2N1-2 rectal carcinoma (42 patients): 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) plus 5-FU, 1 g/m(2)/d on Days 1-4 and 29-32, continuous infusion, and cisplatin, 60 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1 and 29. Four to five weeks after chemoradiation, patients were reevaluated for clinical response by imaging studies (CT scan, transrectal ultrasonography, barium enema, liver ultrasonography, chest X-rays) and restaged (yTNM). Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU + l-folinic acid) was delivered to 26 patients in the FUMIR-T4 protocol group. Local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (FDM), disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to the clinical response and cTNM, yTNM, and pTNM classification. The median follow-up was 67 months. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate was 100% for cT2, 77% for cT3, and 62% for cT4 (p = 0.0497); after chemoradiation, it ranged between 81% and 91% for pT0-pT2 and dropped to 66% for pT3 and 47% for pT4 (p = 0.014). The 5-year local control rate was, at the first staging, 84% for cT3 and 72% for cT4; after chemoradiation, the pT stage correlated significantly with LC (p = 0.0012): 100% for pT0, 83% for pT1, 88% for pT2, 79% for pT3, and 46% for pT4. N stage was statistically significant in predicting FDM and OS at any staging step. A significant impact of tumor response, tumor downstaging, and nodal downstaging on LC, FDM, disease-free survival, and OS was also recorded. If the residual tumor, before surgery, had a tumor index <30 (i.e., width less than one-quarter of rectal circumference and length in its caudocranial axis < or =30 mm), the 5-year LC, FDM, disease-free survival, and OS rates were significantly higher at both the univariate and the multivariate analyses. The surgical procedure was tailored according to tumor downstaging, and thus the choice of sphincter-preserving surgery was based on the distance between the lower pole of the tumor and the anorectal ring "after" chemoradiation. In 36 patients with the lower pole of the lesion in the range of 0-30 mm from the anorectal ring, 16 patients (44%) underwent a sphincter-saving procedure. All clinical outcomes were similar compared with 20 patients with tumor located at the same rectum level who received an abdominoperineal resection. CONCLUSION: After preoperative chemoradiation, clinical response and tumor/nodal pathologic downstaging showed a close correlation with improved outcomes. The better 5-year survival and local control in pT0-2 patients regardless of their initial stage seems to confirm a heterogeneity in rectal cancer patients. The responder population showed a behavior similar to rectal cancer diagnosed at Stage cT1-2 and treated with conservative surgery alone. Additional studies aimed at improving local tumor response seem justified. Trials of sphincter-saving surgery after a major response are warranted.

Abstract: AIM: Pancreatic cancer is a near fatal disease. External beam radiotherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been proposed with the aim to improve clinical outcome in resectable tumors. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and outcome in patients with cT1-3 pancreatic cancer, treated with surgery, external beam radiotherapy and IORT. METHODS: From 1990 to 1996, 17 patients with clinical stage T1-3N0-1M0 adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas were treated with pancreatectomy and pre- (nine patients: 5 Gy), intra- (all patients: 10 Gy) and post-operative (all patients: 50 Gy) radiotherapy. The pathologic T stages were: 4 pT2 and 13 pT3. The pathologic N stages were: 9 pN0 and 8 pN1. Minimum follow-up in living patients was 60 months. RESULTS: No perioperative mortalities were recorded. Two patients showed postoperative morbidity (11.8%) which required a subsequent laparotomy. The disease-free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 41, 23 and 18%, respectively (median: 9 months). The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 70%, 41% and 18%, respectively (median: 17.5 months). Three patients developed local failure (17.6%) and 12 patients showed distant metastases (70.6%). Univariate analysis (logrank) showed: a significant correlation between both N-stage and retroperitoneal involvement (RPI) with local control (N-stage: P=0.0155; RPI:P =0.0295), a significant correlation between maximum tumor size and metastases-free survival (P=0.0167) and overall survival (P=0.0241); the female gender was another predictor of prolonged survival (P= 0.0465). Multivariate analysis (Cox) showed a significant impact of N-stage and retroperitoneal involvement on local control and also a significant correlation between perineural involvement and tumor diameter with metastases-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: These results are similar to those of other published series and suggest that this approach is feasible with acceptable local control and survival, especially in patients with small tumors (<2.5 cm: 5 year survival=33.3%) and in female patients (5 year survival=30%). Due to the impact of gender, tumor diameter and N stage on prognosis, in the design of future trials a stratification of patients based on these categories should be considered. The search of effective chemotherapeutic agents is required, to reduce the high incidence of distant metastases, especially in larger tumors.

Abstract: The prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma is dismal. Its main reason can be attributed to the difficult early diagnosis. In fact, at diagnosis most patients show advanced disease. In recent years, studies on the biomolecular characteristics of this disease have been conducted. The obtained results have favored the understanding of the basic mechanisms of the biologic aggressiveness and the resistance to chemoradiation of pancreatic carcinoma. They include the frequent oncogene activation as well as the similarly frequent suppressor gene inhibition. Based on this new knowledge, novel therapeutic strategies have been identified and treatments of targeting the ras oncoprotein or mutated p53, metalloproteinase inhibitors and tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors (trastuzumab and cetuximab) together with antiangiogenic therapies are under experimentation.

Abstract:

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of several clinical variables in a patient population undergoing neoadjuvant hormonotherapy (NHT) with external beam radiotherapy (ERT) to identify subsets of patients with an unfavorable prognosis who require intensified therapy. Eighty-four patients (mean age, 68.2 +/- 6.1 years; range, 52-81 years) underwent ERT (45 Gy to pelvic volume; 65 Gy mean dose to prostate volume) and NHT (oral flutamide: 250 mg three times daily for 30 days; LH-RH analogue: one vial every 28 days starting two months before radiotherapy and for its entire duration). The distribution according to clinical stage was T2: 46.4%, T3: 50.0%, T4: 3.6%. The distribution according to the Gleason score was grade 2-4: 17.9%; grade 5-7: 53.6%; grade 8-10: 28.5%. The distribution according to pretreatment PSA levels (in ng/mL) was 0-4: 5.9%; 4-10: 26.2%; 10-20:16.7%; > or = 20: 51.2%. With a median follow-up of 36 months, 3.6% of patients died; hematogenous metastases and local disease progression were found in 16.7% and 6% of patients, respectively. Overall, the incidence of disease progression was 17.9%. 32.9% of patients showed biochemical failure during followup. Overall, metastasis-free, local progression-free and biochemical failure-free actuarial survival at five years was 89.2%, 66.5%, 85.0% and 41.9%, respectively. At univariate analysis (log-rank) clinical stage (cT) was shown to be significantly correlated with the incidence of metastasis (P = 0.0004), local progression (P < 0.0001) and disease-free survival (P = 0.0005). At multivariate analysis (Cox) the correlations between clinical stage and metastasis (P = 0.0175), local progression (P = 0.0200) and disease-free survival (P = 0.0175) were confirmed. Gleason score and pretreatment PSA levels did not show any significant correlation with these endpoints. These results confirm the indications of the recent literature, which, in prostate carcinoma at higher clinical stages, suggest the use of prolonged hormonal therapy after radiotherapy.

Abstract: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) refers to the delivery of irradiation at surgery. A large single dose of irradiation is delivered to a surgically defined area, while uninvolved and dose-limiting tissues are displaced, the final goal of IORT being enhanced locoregional tumour control. IORT is used in most modern protocol studies as a boost radiation component of multidisciplinary treatment approaches. More recently, high activity radiation sources or mobile operating room treatment machines are used to facilitate the IORT procedure. Clinical experiences have shown that IORT may improve local control and disease-free survival, especially when used in adjuvant setting, combined with external beam irradiation in some neoplasms such as cancer of the stomach, pancreas, colorectum, and soft tissue sarcoma. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.

Abstract:

Abstract: HYPOTHESIS: Despite aggressive approaches, locoregional tumor control and survival rates for patients with cancer of the pancreatic head remain disappointing. In the present study, we address whether intraoperative and adjuvant radiotherapy may improve the prognosis for these patients. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: From February 1985 to December 1995, 46 patients with an adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head underwent pancreatic resection. The last 26 patients also received intraoperative radiotherapy (except 5 patients) and adjuvant external beam radiation therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic data, tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, 5-year survival, and local control of disease were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The morbidity rate was not increased by adjuvant radiation therapy; it was 43% in patients treated with surgery alone and 57% in patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy (P =.1); operative mortality was 8% (n = 2) and 9% (n = 2), respectively (P =.8). Overall 5-year survival and local control were 13% and 48.6%, respectively. The mean +/- SD 5-year survival was 5.5% +/- 5.3% (median, 10.8 months) in the surgery-alone group and 15.7% +/- 8.6% (median, 14.3 months) in the surgery plus radiotherapy group (P =.06); local control at 5 years was 29.8% +/- 16.9% and 58.4% +/- 19.9%, respectively (P<.01). Median metastasis-free survival was 8 and 9 months, respectively (P =.52). Multivariate analysis showed that adjuvant radiotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for survival (P<.01) and local control of the disease (P =.03). CONCLUSION: The present study supports the role of radiotherapy combined with pancreatoduodenectomy for treatment of cancer of the pancreatic head because even if the improvement in overall survival is moderate, it is effective in improving the local control of the tumor.

Abstract: The use of raltitrexed ('Tomudex') as concomitant chemotherapy during preoperative radiotherapy in chemonaïve patients with stage II/III rectal cancer has been examined in this study and its recommended dose in conjunction with radiotherapy investigated. Forty-five Gray (Gy) of radiotherapy (1.8 Gy daily, 5 days per week) was delivered to the posterior pelvis, followed by a 5.4 Gy boost. Single doses of raltitrexed (2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 mg/m(2)) were administered on days 1, 19 and 38. Only 1 of the 15 patients entered experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 leucopenia) at the 3.0 mg/m(2) dose level. The overall response rate was 80% (five complete responses, seven partial responses). These preliminary data suggest that raltitrexed is a well tolerated and effective treatment when combined with preoperative radiotherapy in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. The recommended dose of raltitrexed for future phase II studies will be 3.0 mg/m(2).

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare acute toxicity, tumor response, and sphincter preservation in three schedules of concurrent chemoradiation in resectable transmural and/or node-positive extraperitoneal rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 1999, 163 consecutive patients were treated according to the following combined modalities: FUMIR: between 1990 and 1995, 83 patients were treated with bolus i.v. mitomycin C (MMC), 10 mg/m(2) day 1, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1-4, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy (37.8 Gy). PLAFUR-4: between 1995 and 1998, 40 patients were treated with cisplatin (c-DDP) 60 mg/m(2) given as slow infusion (1-4 h) on days 1 and 29, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2), days 1-4 and 29-32 with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy). PLAFUR-5: between 1998 and 1999, 40 patients were treated with c-DDP 60 mg/m(2) given as slow infusion (during 1-4 h) on days 1 and 29, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2), days 1-5 and 29-33 with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy). RESULTS: Grade > or = 3 acute toxicity occurred in 14%, 5%, and 17% of patients treated in the FUMIR, PLAFUR-4, and PLAFUR-5 studies, respectively (p = 0.201). In the FUMIR, PLAFUR-4, and PLAFUR-5 studies, clinical response rate was 77%, 70%, and 83%, respectively. Tumor downstaging occurred in 57%, 68%, and 58% of patients, respectively. Pathologic complete response was recorded in 9% (FUMIR), 23% (PLAFUR-4), and 20% (PLAFUR-5) of patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was feasible in 44% (FUMIR), 40% (PLAFUR-4), and 61% (PLAFUR-5) of patients having a distance between the anal-rectal ring and the lower pole of the tumor of 0-30 mm, and in 95%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in those having a distance of 31-50 mm. Comparing FUMIR vs. PLAFUR, the clinical response rate was similar in the two series: a partial response was observed in 62/81 (77%) patients with FUMIR treatment, and in 61/80 (76%) patients with PLAFUR treatment. Tumor downstaging was observed in 46/81 (57%) patients and in 50/80 (68%) patients, respectively. The pathologic complete response rate was statistically higher in the PLAFUR series: 7/81 (9%) patients with FUMIR treatment and 17/80 (21%) patients with PLAFUR treatment (p = 0.04). Major downstaging (pT0+ pTmic+ pT1) in the FUMIR group was reported in 12/81 (15%) patients versus 31/80 (39%) patients in the PLAFUR group (p = 0.0006). The anal sphincter was preserved in 63/81 (78%) patients with FUMIR treatment and in 69/80 (86%) patients with PLAFUR treatment. The perioperative morbidity was statistically lower with PLAFUR: a perioperative morbidity was experienced by 20/81 (25%) patients with FUMIR treatment and by 9/80 (11%) patients with PLAFUR treatment (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: In our experience, higher radiation dose (50.4 Gy vs. 37.8 Gy), a second course of concurrent 5-FU, and the use of c-DDP instead of MMC improved the pathologic response rate without increasing acute toxicity and perioperative morbidity. The use of 5-FU 5-day infusion (PLAFUR-5) resulted in higher toxicity with a similar response rate compared to 4-day infusion (PLAFUR-4).

Abstract: The Quality Handbook includes the description of the activities carried out in Radiotherapy and the methodology used to ensure the Quality Assurance according to the principles indicated in national and international documents of reference and the recommendations of accreditation agencies. The structure of the Quality Handbook, the main aspects of single chapters, the selected quality indicators undergoing inspections are analysed and procedures to be followed for changes and updating of the Quality Handbook are described. The Quality Assurance program is illustrated in another article of this issue.

Abstract: Brachytherapy is a conventional method of radiation therapy characterized by peculiar technical, clinical, operational and radioprotection problems. Therefore, the management of a service or department of brachytherapy requires a specific organization aimed at Quality Assurance. In this report, the personal experience with the drawing up of a Quality Handbook of brachytherapy with reference to the method used and the structure of the document, is described.

Abstract: Patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinoma have an unfavourable prognosis for the high incidence of distant metastases, the infrequent feasibility of radical surgical resection, and, in these last cases, the high incidence of re-recurrences. Based on the low resectability rate of pelvic recurrences, the clear impact of tumor diameter on resectability and outcome, and the documented possibility to achieve a significant tumor downstaging and downsizing with the use of concurrent chemoradiation, it is evident that the most promising treatment several authors have considered concurrent chemoradiation followed, if feasible, by radical resection. Furthermore, based on the high local and distant failure rate after surgery, the utilization of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) and adjuvant chemotherapy seems justified. Some published comparisons between patients treated with and without IORT seems to suggest the possible improvement in both local control and survival in these patients. Particularly interesting issues in this field are: 1) the definition of the most effective treatment modality (both in terms of radiation dose, fractionation and techniques, and drugs to be used concurrently to radiotherapy); 2) the analysis of the prognostic impact of several factors, with the aim of designing and validating staging systems of local rectal recurrences; 3) the possibility to treat with relatively high doses also patients previously irradiated on the pelvis.

Abstract: The approach to the implementation of a Quality Assurance Program applied from 1 October 2000 at the Radiotherapy Service of the "Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Policlinico "A. Gemelli" of Rome, is described. Some major aspects of this program are analyzed.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Cancers of the extrahepatic biliary tract are rare. Surgical resection is considered the standard treatment, but is rarely feasible. Several reports of combined modality therapy, including external beam radiation, often combined with chemotherapy and intraluminal brachytherapy, have been published. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of chemoradiation plus intraluminal brachytherapy on response, local control, survival, and symptom relief in patients with unresectable or residual extrahepatic biliary carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From February 1991 to December 1997, 20 patients (14 male, 6 female; mean age 61 +/- 12 years; median follow-up 71 months) with unresectable (16 patients) or residual (4 patients), nonmetastatic extrahepatic bile tumors (common bile duct, 8; gallbladder, 1; Klatskin, 11) received external beam radiation (39.6-50.4 Gy); in 19 patients, 5-fluorouracil (96-h continuous infusion, days 1-4 at 1,000 mg/m(2)/day) was also administered. Twelve patients received a boost by intraluminal brachytherapy using (192)Ir wires of 30-50 Gy, prescribed 1 cm from the source axis. RESULTS: During external beam radiotherapy, 8 patients (40%) developed grade 1-2 gastrointestinal toxicity. Four patients treated with external-beam plus intraluminal brachytherapy had a clinical response (2 partial, 2 complete) after treatment. For the total patient group, the median survival and time to local progression was 21.2 and 33.1 months, respectively. Distant metastasis occurred in 10 (50%) patients. Two patients who received external beam radiation plus intraluminal brachytherapy developed late duodenal ulceration. Two patients with unresectable disease survived more than 5 years. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that chemoradiation plus intraluminal brachytherapy was relatively well-tolerated, and resulted in reasonable local control and median survival. Further follow-up and additional research is needed to determine the ultimate efficacy of this regimen. New chemoradiation combinations and/or new treatment strategies (neoadjuvant chemoradiation) may contribute, in the future, to improve these results.

Abstract: To-date, the therapeutic standards, defined by randomized studies for carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas are disappointing. Obviously, there is much interest in the improvement of these results based on the evidence of additional clinical trials. To identify some trends in the clinical research in this field, some characteristics of 31 ongoing trials, described in the web site of the National Cancer Institute were examined. 28/31 trials are coordinated by Centers of the U.S.A. and 3/31 trials specifically concern symptom palliation. Excluding the latter, 4 trials enroll patients with operable neoplasms, 8 with inoperable tumors, 4 with metastatic neoplasm and 12 involve both latter categories. Four of the 5 phase I or I-II studies concern concomitant radiochemotherapy of inoperable neoplasms; the 16 phase II studies and the 7 phase III studies involve the use of different combined modality therapies in all patient categories. Overall, 18 trials test innovative treatment modalities (new drugs, immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies). Eight trials include the evaluation of the quality of life between endpoints. Based on this assessment of some of the ongoing clinical trials, hopefully, there will be: 1. a greater interest in the prospective therapies for this neoplasm, especially at the European level, considering the high incidence of this disease; 2. more careful attention to the possibility of downstaging of locally advanced neoplasms considering the present, proven possibility to achieve better clinical responses in pancreatic carcinoma; 3. a more widespread interest in the establishment of parameters for the quality of life, considering the frequently "palliative" intent of available therapies.

Abstract: Anemia represents a common finding in cancer patients, especially at an advanced stage. Anemia has an impact on the quality of life and at the same time seems to markedly limit the disease control that can be achieved with radiotherapy. The results of a series of clinical studies published in the last decade allow some general observations: 1. the administration of erythropoietin, especially if associated to ferrous sulfate is able to increase hemoglobulin levels in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy (combined with concomitant chemotherapy); 2. erythropoietin stimulation of hemoglobin in anemia decreases the need for blood transfusion in cancer patients; 3. tumor response to radiation therapy appears to be enhanced by erythropoietin-induced hemoglobulin increase. Further clinical studies are required for assessment of indications, identification of optimal administration modalities, cost-analysis of this promising therapy for patients undergoing radiation therapy.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil and cisplatin are characterized by in vitro synergism as well as radiosensitization. A phase I-II study was carried out on patients with invasive cervical carcinoma (FIGO IIB-IIIA) undergoing concomitant chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin followed by radical surgery. METHODS: Twenty-six patients of 53 years median age, 24 with IIB tumor and 2 with IIIA tumor, all with squamous carcinoma, entered the study. The chemoradiation protocol included external radiotherapy to the pelvis: 39.6 Gy (180 cGy/daily); 5-fluorouracil: 1 g/m(2)/daily, in continuous intravenous infusion days 1-4 and 27-30; cisplatin: 20 mg/m(2)/daily days 1-4 and 27-30. Four weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent restaging and then radical surgery with pelvic and lumboaortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients are evaluable for acute toxicity and 24 are evaluable for objective and pathologic response. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia or leukopenia was observed in 6 patients and grade 3 acute gastrointestinal toxicity in 3. After chemoradiation CR and PR were observed in 64 and 36% of cases, respectively (CR + PR = 100%). Two patients were excluded from surgery for other diseases. The remaining 24 patients were operated on; 23/24 patients showed negative section margins. The histology of the surgical specimen showed the absence of disease in 13 patients (54.2%), microscopic residual tumor in 4 patients (16.6%), residual disease </=1 cm in 5 patients, and residual disease >1 cm in 2 patients. Median follow up was 33 months. Two-year actuarial local control was 91.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a particularly high rate of pathologic responses (complete + Tmic: 70.8%) and local control (2 years = 91.7%) in patients with advanced cervical cancer undergoing moderate doses of radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery.

Abstract: Prostatic carcinoma, in the male population ranks first as incidence and second as cause of oncologic mortality. In the last decades, significantly better clinical results were achieved both in diagnosis and therapy. The latter covers a broad range of possibilities, including standard surgery, nerve-sparing surgery, combined surgery and hormonotherapy, cryosurgery, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, conformal radiotherapy, combined hormone and radiation therapy, as well as conventional hormonotherapy. However, there is still much controversy on the role of the screening, the most appropriate staging modalities, the most adequate treatment in the various presentations of the disease. The present trends of the clinical research in this field are directed towards the identification of factors involved in the onset of this neoplasm and the possibility of decreasing its incidence with programs of chemoprevention, the identification of new biological markers able to assess the biological potential of the disease, the comparison between the main treatment modalities of localized carcinoma (surgery, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy) and the definition of parameters predictive of the response to the various treatments to better personalize the therapy of the single patient, the development of treatments based on genetic therapy and of effective systemic therapies able to control the hormone-resistant advanced disease and to clarify the impact of the different therapies on the quality of life and health care costs.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Rectal carcinoma patients with local recurrence are reported to have a dismal prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined modality therapy on clinical outcome and to determine the prognostic impact of a "presurgical" staging system. METHODS: Between September 1989 and June 1997, 47 patients (with a median follow-up of 80 months) with locally recurrent, nonmetastatic rectal carcinoma were classified according to the extent of pelvic sidewall involvement as determined by pretreatment computed tomography (CT) scan. They received preoperative external beam radiation (45-47 grays [Gy] in 34 patients; 23.4 Gy in 13 preirradiated patients) plus concomitant 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/day as a 96-hour continuous infusion on Days 1-4 + 29-32) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2) as a bolus intravenously on Day 1 + 29). After 4-6 weeks, the patients were evaluated for surgical resection and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) procedure (10-15 Gy) or, in unresectable patients, a boost dose was planned by chemoradiation (23.4 Gy) or brachytherapy. Thereafter, adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for a total of six to nine courses) was prescribed. RESULTS: During chemoradiation, 2 patients (4.3%) developed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3-4 acute toxicity. Twenty-five patients (53. 2%) had an objective response after chemoradiation. Twenty-one patients (45%) underwent radical surgical resection. The overall 5-year survival and local control rates were 22% and 32%, respectively. The classification system significantly predicted survival (P = 0.008). Radically resected patients had better local control and survival (P < 0.0001); in patients treated with IORT, the 5-year local control and survival rates were 79% and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study suggest that combined modality therapy was well tolerated and improved resectability, local control, and survival. The classification system appears to be a reliable tool with which to predict clinical outcome in patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.

Abstract: AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The prognosis of pancreatic cancer remains poor. Surgery, when feasible, is rarely curative. Radiation therapy (RT) and concomitant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have been shown to improve survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In an attempt to improve resectability and disease control, we used preoperative chemoradiation in a combined modality therapy protocol. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our initial results in terms of acute toxicity and response. METHODS: From October 1995 to May 1998, 20 patients (11 males, 9 females; mean age, 60.1 years; median follow-up, 28 months) with unresectable (12 patients) or resectable (8 patients) non-metastatic pancreatic tumors, received external beam radiation (39.6 Gy) plus 5-FU (96 hours continuous infusion, days 1-4 at 1000 mg/m2/day). After 4 weeks, patients were evaluated for surgical resection. In resected patients, electron-beam intraoperative radiation therapy (10 Gy) was given before reconstruction. Thereafter, in resected patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed (6 courses: 5-FU, mitomycin C, adriamicine). RESULTS: During chemoradiation, no patients developed grade 3-4 acute toxicity. Three out of twelve (25%) patients with unresectable tumors had tumor downstaging. No patients showed partial or complete responses. Four out of twenty patients (20%) had minimal tumor response. Three patients showed disease progression after chemoradiation (liver or peritoneal metastases). Nine patients underwent surgical resection and IORT, with 1 postoperative death. The median survival time for the 20 patients was 9.4 (18.5 and 8.3 months in resected and unresected patients, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that preoperative 5-FU chemoradiation was well tolerated and may result in tumor downstaging but the response-rate is still low. Based on the impact of surgical resection on survival, an improvement in local response rate is necessary.

Abstract: One of the principal therapeutic options in unresectable carcinoma of exocrine pancreas is concomitant radiochemotherapy. However, in current scientific literature cost analyses of this therapeutic modality are lacking. A payer-oriented cost-effectiveness analysis of concomitant radiochemotherapy was carried out. Outcomes and differences in costs relatively to two different therapeutic strategies were compared retrospectively: biliary drainage + observation (group 1); biliary drainage + concomitant radiochemotherapy (group 2). Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on the analysis of incremental cost of benefit in terms of survival in group 2. As incremental cost of group 2 was considered that of radiochemotherapy, costs of diagnosis and staging being similar in the two groups. The unit of measurement used was $/Lys (LYS = years of life saved). For estimates of cost-effectiveness in different clinical situations, a sensitivity analysis was carried out. The incremental cost of standard concomitant radiochemotherapy was shown to be $4,755. Incremental costs relatively to the situations of minimum and maximum treatment were shown to be $4,410 and $8,375, respectively. Median survival was 4.5 and 10 months in group 1 and 2 respectively (logrank: p = 0.0046). The benefit in terms of survival achieved by concomitant radiochemotherapy was shown to be 5.5 months equal to 0.46 years. Therefore, in the standard situation, the treatment cost-effectiveness can be estimated in: $4,755/0.46 years = $10,337/LYS, that is, the cost of a year of life saved was shown to be $10,337. Results of sensitivity analysis showed that cost-effectiveness can be estimated in the range $7,603 and $25,379/LYS. In conclusion, concomitant radiochemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma is able to improve the quality of life through the relief of related symptoms as well as median survival (10 vs 4.5 months). Costs of these benefits, even if considering better survival only, based on this analysis, were shown to be acceptable.

Abstract: In the last decade a rapid increase in the incidence of prostate cancer was observed. The reasons for this increase are associated to the progressive population aging, especially in the developed countries as well as to the growing number of identified cases with the widespread use of prostate specific antigen. A number of aspects of the disease are still to be considered in depth: the natural history of the disease in patients with early diagnosis, the potential costs of screening programs in financial, social and psychologic terms, the effectiveness and especially cost-effectiveness of different treatments and follow-up for local and advanced forms. Because of the long natural history of prostate cancer and the effectiveness of hormonal treatments used as salvage after failure of primary therapy, the differences in survival among the various therapeutic options, from radical prostatectomy to radiotherapy, or simple clinical control in selected cases are probably minor. This is the reason why future clinical studies should necessarily be based on multidimensional evaluations, taking into account the clinical outcome as well as the quality of life and costs of the different treatment modalities examined.

Abstract: Concomitant radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma has been shown to be useful in improving local control and survival in operated patients and in favoring sphincter preservation when administered before surgery. Together with the search for less toxic combinations, cost-analysis of radiochemotherapy has become topical also in consideration of new generation drugs. In this study the analysis was carried out by comparing the costs for 4 different combined modalities in the dual perspective of the payer (the National Health Service) and the provider (the Hospital). Based on their characteristic of treatment and innovative aspects, the following combinations were examined: external beam radiotherapy (ERT) 50.4 Gy + 5FU bolus; ERT 50.4 Gy + 5FU protracted infusion; ERT 50.4 Gy + 5FU continuous infusion, week 1 and 5; ERT 50.4 Gy+ Tomudex bolus. Costs were evaluated based on the frequency and type of specific services provided in therapeutic protocols: the positioning of central venous catheter, time of stay in day-hospital or hospital ward and the cost of drugs. Calculations were carried out based on an "ideal" patient of 1.7 sqm body surface. Costs were based on out patient rates, DRGs and the official drug list valid to September 1999. As for day-hospital costs afforded by the payer it is observed that the most expensive combinations are bolus and continuous infusion followed by protracted infusion; Tomudex, is the most economic. As for hospital costs afforded by the provider, it is observed that the most expensive combination is continuous infusion followed by protracted infusion, bolus administration and Tomudex. In conclusion, doctors are increasingly involved in the economic and organizational aspects of therapeutic decisions; however, the patient's needs should be kept in mind; apart from the therapeutic benefits, lower toxicity and ready use of treatments are amongst the patient's needs. The analysis of the patient's satisfaction is still lacking suitable means of evaluation, however it should be defined and carefully studied for an exhaustive evaluation of the impact of combined modality therapy.

Abstract: The experience with a model of homecare provided to oncologic patients and their families, implemented in a Radiation Oncology service, is reported. The requirements in terms of care and psychological support to terminally ill patients are considered and the global needs of their families are analyzed. To address the related complex problems, a new organizational model was designed to integrate healthcare providers expert in different fields who are dealing with those problems.

Abstract: PURPOSE: It was hypothesized that using a simplified technique of volumes profiles determination (STVPD) based on CT data sets (correlate and projection) would increase the target dose without increasing the bladder and rectal dose obtained by conventional simulation techniques. To test this hypothesis, patients referred for radical radiation treatment for prostate carcinoma were prospectively evaluated by performing treatment planning using standard simulation, with (SSB) and without corner blocks (SSWB), STVPD, and 3D beam's eye view. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one patients with prostate carcinoma (stage B: 7; stage C: 14) underwent four treatment planning procedures where the field arrangement was defined by standard simulation (SSB and SSWB), STVPD, and 3D beam's eye view (BEV) with a four field (10 MV photons) box technique. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the planning target volume (PTV), bladder, and rectum (relatives to the four techniques) were generated for all patients and compared; average percentage dose to the bladder and rectum were also calculated. RESULTS: STVPD and 3D BEV treated an increased percentage of PTV at 95% isodose level, in comparison to standard simulation (with and without blocks). No statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques. A significant reduction of irradiated bladder volume was found between 3D BEV and STVPD versus simulation with and without blocks (mean percentage dose: 77.3%, 81.8%, 93.5%, and 92.6% respectively). No marked differences were recorded in rectal irradiation (mean percentage dose: 53.1%, 53.7%, 51.9%, and 50.2% respectively). Time required for treatment planning (excluding CT scan and definitive simulation) was less than 15 minutes for STVPD and more than 120 minutes for 3D BEV. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the inadequacy of standard simulation. It is possible, with conformal therapy, to increase the dose to the PTV, decreasing the irradiated volume of the bladder. The absence of sparing effect in the rectum is discussed. Using a box technique, STVPD can be used routinely to define the PTV in patients with prostate cancer, reducing the time required for treatment planning, with dosimetric results similar to those of 3D BEV.

Abstract: Thirty-six patients with pancreatic head carcinoma entered a protocol, but only 20 were suitable for resection and evaluation of long-term survival. They were nine males and 11 females, with a mean age of 64.3 years. Following surgical resection, 10 Gy was delivered to the tumor bed intraoperatively. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed 4-6 weeks after surgery: patients were treated with 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/day, 5 days/week) to the tumor and nodal bed. Since 1991, 10 patients have also received preoperative short-course radiotherapy (5 Gy) of the liver and pancreas. Postoperative morbidity was 25%; two postoperative deaths were observed in patients with locally advanced neoplasms, in whom a vascular resection was also performed. Only 14 patients started postoperative radiotherapy, which was interrupted in two cases. At present, 14 patients are dead and four are alive and disease free. The local recurrence rate was 11.1% and distant metastases were observed in 66.7% of cases. The median actuarial survival was 11.9 months, but it was 18.5 months in patients with disease-free resection margins. A significantly better survival was also observed in patients submitted to short-course preoperative radiotherapy. These preliminary results show that intraoperative and perioperative radiotherapy is feasible and may improve local control of disease. Unfortunately, these results are not matched by a significant improvement in survival due to the high incidence of intraabdominal metastases. Thus, new therapeutic modalities, including preoperative radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy), should be tested.

Abstract: Local recurrence affects approximately 50% of patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. To lower the incidence of locoregional recurrence, the combination with surgery of adjuvant radiotherapy has been proposed. The latter is based on external radiotherapy (ERT), intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) or their combination. To evaluate the impact on local control and survival, results achieved in a a group of patients undergoing surgical resection and combined adjuvant radiotherapy, are analyzed. 17 patients with adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas were treated with a therapeutic protocol based on pancreatectomy and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) to the tumor bed (10 Gy) followed by postoperative radiotherapy (50 Gy); 9 patients underwent also preoperative radiotherapy (5 Gy) to the pancreas and liver. With a median follow-up of 45 months, in 3 patients (17.6%) local recurrence was observed while 12 patients (70.6%) showed liver metastases or peritoneal spread. Median survival was 17.5 months and actuarial survival at 2 and 5 years was 41.2% and 11.2%, respectively. As compared to a moderate local control, the prognosis of patients undergoing surgical resection remained disappointing. Thus, the effort of improving results with new therapeutic modalities as preoperative radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, seems justified.

Abstract: The combination of concomitant external beam radiotherapy (ERT) and neoadjuvant hormonotherapy was shown to be able to significantly improve local control and disease-free survival in locally advanced prostatic carcinoma. (RTOG study 8610). Aim of this analysis was to assess the clinical results observed in a population of patients undergoing this combined treatment and, more particularly, to examine the prognostic impact of local control. 84 patients (T2: 47%, T3: 49.4%, T4: 3.6%) underwent concomitant ERT (dose to pelvic volume: 45 Gy; mean dose to prostatic volume: 65 Gy) and neoadjuvant hormonotherapy (flutamide: 250 mg three times/daily for 30 days; LH-RH analogue: 1 oral dose every 28 days starting 2 months prior to radiotherapy and for its whole duration). With a median follow-up of 36 months, 3.6% of patients were deceased; hematogenous metastases and local disease progression were recorded in 16.7% and 4.8% of patients, respectively. Local disease progression was shown to be significantly correlated with the incidence of metastases. In fact, the actuarial incidence of metastases at 5 years was 100% and 27% in patients with and without local recurrence (p = 0.0043) respectively. Overall, metastases-free local and biochemical recurrence-free survival was 89.2%, 66.5%, 85.0% and 41.9% respectively. At univariate analysis (logrank) the clinical stage (T) was shown to be significantly correlated with the incidence of metastases (p = .0004) and local progression (p < .0001). In conclusion, this study has confirmed the low rate of local progression with the combination of hormonotherapy and radiotherapy and the significant correlation of local control with the incidence of hematogenous metastases.

Abstract: The natural history of cervical carcinoma is characterized by a close correlation between local control and survival. Local eradication of the disease is justified for the obvious impact on the quality of life as well as on long-term survival. A series of analyses carried out in the last decades have elucidated the role of a number of prognostic factors in local control. Among treatment modalities applied to attain this aim, particular interest has been focused in recent years on concomitant radiation and chemotherapy. While some experiences have shown promising results, the precise role of this combination will be defined based on the outcomes of some randomized studies now in progress. Among the modalities of concomitant radiation and chemotherapy, some authors have proposed the following sequence: neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. It is an aggressive approach potentially associated to major side-effects. This therapeutic modality will require an accurate assessment of clinical results both in terms of clinical response, local control and effects on organ function and quality of life.

Abstract: Thirty-two patients with cT2 prostatic adenocarcinoma underwent a protocol of combined treatment based on: neoadjuvant hormonotherapy (LH-RH analogues + antiandrogens) and concomitant external radiotherapy (ERT), two months before ERT until the end of it; ERT to the entire pelvis (45 Gy) with a boost dose to the prostatic volume (+20 Gy). All patients completed the planned treatment. Acute toxicity was moderate (Gr 1-2 RTOG). At a median follow-up of 22 months (range: 6-68) one patient (3.1%) showed bone metastases while none had local disease progression. Overall 5 year survival and disease-free survival were 100% and 97% respectively. Late toxicity was mild (Gr 1 RTOG: intestinal: 3.1%; urological: 21.9%). The protocol was shown to be feasible with no relevant toxicity. Even if the follow-up was short, results achieved in this group of potentially resectable prostatic cancer patients seem to confirm the possibility of achieving results comparable to those of surgery with no relevant impairment of urinary and intestinal function, thus with an acceptable quality of life.

Abstract:

Abstract: From January, 1991, to December, 1995, forty-two patients with prostatic cancer (T2-T4: 40 patients) were treated with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analog (2 administrations before and 3 during irradiation), Flutamide (1 month) and external beam radiation therapy (45 Gy to the whole pelvis and a 20 Gy boost). All patients completed the protocol and the LHRH analog was continued for 1-6 months in 5 patients with partial response at the end of radiotherapy. The incidence of acute toxicity was low according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer score (grades 1-2; 19% hematologic, 36% intestinal and 38% urological toxicity). At a median follow-up of 21 months (range: 1-60 months), one patient had local disease progression and lung metastases and two had bone metastases; the three relapsing patients were given the LHRH analog and exhibited partial response to rectal examination (1 case) and to bone scan (2 cases). Pain disappeared completely in both the patients with bone metastases. Overall 3-year survival and disease-free survival rates were 97% and 79%, respectively. Disease-free survival was significantly related to cT (at 3 years: cT2: 100%; cT3: 81.2%; log rank test: 0.0081). Late toxicity was observed in two patients: rectal bleeding in one case and chronic diarrhea in the other. The combined protocol used in this study was feasible and well tolerated. Our results seem to confirm the promising preliminary results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 8610 study.

Abstract: Over a 5-year period, 6 patients with potentially resectable (cT2) pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent exclusive radiotherapy. Surgery was ruled out because of the patients' age (> 75 years) in 5 cases and for contraindication for anesthesia in the remaining one. Four patients underwent intraluminal brachytherapy (50 Gy) with linear 192Ir sources; the remaining two underwent concomitant radiochemotherapy (39.6 and 50.4 Gy respectively) followed by a boost dose (50 and 20 Gy respectively) of intraluminal brachytherapy. All patients completed the treatment without relevant acute side-effects. One patient undergoing combined treatment showed gastric ulcer 8 months after treatment. Two patients showed local progression of the disease and two distant metastases. In one of the two patients with local progression, digestive by-pass was required. All patients died. Median survival was of 14 months. Actuarial survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 66%, 33% and 16% respectively. No patient showed pain during follow-up. The fairly good quality of life observed in these patients undergoing conservative treatment and the rate of survival, comparable with that of surgical series, suggest that irradiation should be considered in those patients in whom radical surgery in contraindicated.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cancer in the elderly is becoming an increasing public health problem. Nevertheless, several authors have noted the relative lack of information regarding the treatment of cancer in the elderly. The aim of this study was to determine the tolerance of concomitant chemoradiation in patients age > or = 75 years with anorectal carcinoma. METHODS: The patients were selected for treatment on the basis of the absence of major concurrent diseases, normal blood count values, good cardiac and renal function, and good general condition (defined as not requiring personal assistance). Seventeen patients (8 men and 9 women with a median age of 79 years [range, 75-90 years]) were treated with concomitant chemoradiation (bolus mitomycin C, 10 mg/m2 on Day 1 and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil [5-FU], 1000 mg/m2 for 24 hours on Days 1-4 [FUMIR]). The doses and volumes of pelvic radiation therapy ranged between 38-45 grays according to the primary tumor site and the intent of treatment (curative vs. palliative). RESULTS: The total incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 acute toxicity was 18% (3 of 17 patients). Only 1 patient (6%) was unable to complete the treatment course. With a median follow-up of 26 months, no severe late toxicity was recorded. Sixteen of 17 had >50% reduction in the greatest dimension of the lesion, 6 patients had a complete response (2 rectal and 4 anal tumors), and 12 patients preserved their sphincter function. Of the four patients who had presented with pelvic pain, all had pain relief. Of the six patients who had presented with rectal bleeding, the bleeding was controlled in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant chemoradiation according to the FUMIR schedule used in selected patients age > or = 75 years with anorectal carcinoma can be performed safely.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) in patients with extrahepatic bile duct or pancreatic cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (aged 33-87 years) with unresectable extrahepatic bile duct (n = 18) or pancreatic (n = 13) cancer received ILBT exclusively or as part of a definitive treatment regimen. ILBT was performed with transhepatic percutaneous drainage in four patients and with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 27. Fourteen patients with no metastases, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of < or = 2, and good hematologic parameters received combined modality treatment: 30-Gy ILBT and 45-Gy external-beam radiation therapy with continuous infusion of fluorouracil. Seventeen patients underwent 50-Gy ILBT alone for palliation. RESULTS: No direct treatment-related acute toxic reactions were seen. Three patients had cholangitis early in the study. Three patients had late gastrointestinal bleeding. Jaundice was palliated in all patients (n = 29); pain, in 11 of 13 patients. The survival rate in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer was 62% (five of eight) at 2 years for combined modality treatment. No patient with pancreatic cancer lived for longer than 2 years. CONCLUSION: ILBT is an effective palliative treatment of unresectable extrahepatic bile duct and pancreatic cancers. Results suggest a possible "curative" role in specific clinical settings when properly integrated with other treatments.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To assess the local control and survival of local excision and postoperative radiation in patients with early stage rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1980 to 1992, 21 patients with clinical stage T1-2NxM0 adenocarcinoma of the middle and lower rectum were treated with transanal excision and postoperative external beam radiotherapy (44.6 Gy). The pathologic T stages were: 9 T1 (43%) and 12 T2 (57%). One patient had unassessable resection margins. The median follow-up was 54 months (range: 18-128 months). RESULTS: The actuarial local recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 85.2%, and the overall survival at 5 years was 80.6%. One patient developed a local recurrence and distant metastases at 22 months, and two patients had local recurrence at 11 and 15 months, respectively; both had abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and one remained free of disease 16 months after APR. The incidence of Grade 3 diarrhea was 5%. Sphincter function was good to excellent in the 18 patients with local control. No patients developed clinical evidence of pelvic lymph node recurrence. CONCLUSION: These results are similar to other published series and suggest that this approach is feasible in selected patients with T1-2NxM0 rectal cancer and results in good long-term control of the disease.

Abstract: Radiation therapy represents an extensively experimented treatment modality for head and neck tumors. Recent studies have documented a close dependence of clinical results, especially in terms of local control and toxicity, on the radiation therapy quality. Thus the effort to improve the results of conventional radiotherapy has been achieved with the identification of new therapeutic modalities (non conventional fractionation, conformal therapy, fast neutron radiotherapy, concomitant or neoadiuvant chemotherapy) as well as with constant optimization of the accuracy of used procedures. Among them the following should be mentioned: 1) the systematic use of immobilization systems which enable a significant reduction in positioning errors; 2) checks before and during treatment by portal imaging which enable to identify and correct a relevant percentage of inaccuracies; 3) "in vivo" dosimetry which enables an overall assessment of treatment accuracy. The general evolution of the radiobiological knowledge occurred in recent years has introduced into radiotherapy of head and neck tumors new schemes of fractionation and new modalities of combination with other therapeutic procedures. Furthermore, while the widespread use of complex irradiation procedures calls for the urgent need of quality assurance of radiation treatments, this is by all means a mandatory requirement even in the most conventional clinical practice.

Abstract: External beam radiotherapy is a widely experimented treatment modality in prostatic cancer. Recently published studies have documented a close dependence of clinical results, in terms of local control and toxicity in particular, on radiation therapy quality. Efforts to improve results of conventional radiotherapy were directed towards the identification of new therapeutic modalities (conformal therapy, fast neutron radiotherapy, neoadjuvant hormonotherapy) as well as towards the optimization of treatment accuracy. In this respect, the following procedures have been particularly effective: 1. the systematic use of CT and retrograde urethrography in PTV definition; 2. immobilization systems which allow a significant reduction in positioning errors; 3. checks before and during treatment by "portal imaging" which allow the identification and correction of a relevant percentage of inaccuracies. The general evolution in treatment planning occurred in recent years has introduced into prostatic cancer radiotherapy new methods and calculation algorithms. While at present the use of new and at the same time complex techniques makes the need for quality assurance of radiation treatments increasingly critical, it is in any case a daily requirement even in most conventional routine treatments.

Abstract: Neoplasms of the upper abdomen involve complex problems for radiotherapy. In fact, the anatomical structures are close to each other, lymphatic vessels are numerous and complex, there are organs of low radiation tolerance whose reciprocal position is of difficult assessment and finally there is high visceral mobility due to the diaphragmatic movements. Moreover most organs cannot be identified with the simulator and bone references are of little use. Therefore, treatment of these sites requires the routine application of quality assurance programs, checks of treatment reproducibility, in particular: In a number of clinical settings, CT study of the region (in treatment position) must be included in treatment planning and set-up with simulator and fluoroscopy. Before, during, and after radiotherapy, clinical exams and laboratory tests should be performed to assess the integrity of critical organs.

Abstract: The authors' experience with local excision (LE) and adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of selected cases of rectal cancer, is reported. 41 patients with distal rectal cancer underwent elective LE for cure. Selection criteria were: the site of tumor in the lower rectum, exophytic growth, maximum diameter equal to or lower than 4 cm, tumor "freely" mobile on the rectal wall, clinical staging T1-2 N0M0, histological grading G1-2. Patients shown to be T2 on definitive histology underwent adjuvant radiotherapy to the site of tumor and to pelvic lymph nodes. LE was performed via transanal route under general anesthesia. Operative mortality was 0% and morbidity 7.3%. In 37 cases (90%) surgery was considered radical and curative. The incidence of local recurrence was 5.4%, overall evidence of disease 8.1%, cancer-specific mortality 5.4% and 5-year actuarial survival 90%. The combination with radiotherapy has achieved similar results in T1 (22 cases) and T2 (15 cases) tumors. It is concluded that LE combined with radiotherapy in T2 tumors in selected cases represent a valid therapeutic alternative to more demolitive surgery.

Abstract: In intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) a high dose of radiation is delivered to the tumor or to the tumor bed, thus favouring local control with no significant increase in toxicity. At present it is used to deliver a boost dose of radiation for rectal cancer in protocols which include preoperative external beam radiation therapy (ERT). From various experiences carried out in a number of centers, the technical and methodological features of this procedure have been defined also relatively to cost-effectiveness in terms of a longer surgical treatment, involved specialized staff and resources. At the 5th IORT International Congress held in Lyon in September, 1994, of over 70 clinical studies reported, 15 were on rectal cancer with about 700 patients undergoing IORT. The growing interest in the use of this procedure in rectal cancer is explained by the natural history of the disease, burdened with a high rate of local recurrence, and by the possibility of preventing it with high doses of radiation. In primary tumors unresectable for cure and in local recurrence it is evidenced that ERT+surgery+IORT enable an improvement in local control and survival as compared to ERT alone. Results are better when surgery is radical. Several studies deal with the role of preoperative combined concomitant radiochemotherapy which can favour a radical surgery. A sizeable percentage of these patients will present with metastasis, thus adjuvant chemotherapy seems suitable. A role of IORT is envisaged also for resectable high risk tumors, however results should be confirmed by larger clinical series.

Abstract: Pancreatic tumors represent a major field of application of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with electron beams. First clinical studies were carried out principally on unresectable tumors and control of pain was observed in most of them. However, as for prognosis, IORT alone has yielded disappointing results. The use of IORT to boost external beam radiotherapy (ERT) frequently applied in recent trials, has improved local control but not survival rate because of the high incidence of abdominal metastasis. To-date, results of IORT used as an adjuvant to radical surgery have been controversial. As in unresectable tumors, studies have been focused on the combination IORT+ERT, however the intensification of the dose delivered to the tumor bed and the consequent better local control has not resulted in a better prognosis. A more significant contribution of IORT to the treatment of pancreatic tumors may come in the future from the combination of IORT with more effective methods in the control of the abdominal disease ("prophylactic" ERT to the liver or upper abdomen, intra-arterial or intraperitoneal chemotherapy) or from variously timed combinations with ERT (neoadjuvant ERT+IORT).

Abstract: PURPOSE: A new method of palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice is presented. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients with carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts (EHBD-five patients) or pancreatic head (PH-seven patients) received radiation therapy between 1988 and 1991. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was performed in four EHBD patients and an endoprosthesis was placed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the other eight patients. All 12 received intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT): 20-50 Gy calculated at 1 cm from the Iridium-192 (192Ir) wire. In four PH patients the source was placed in the duct of Wirsung; in the other eight patients ILBT was performed via the common bile duct. Five of the seven PH patients and one of the five EHBD patients received External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT): 26-50 Gy, alone or with concomitant 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). RESULTS: Cholangitis occurred in six patients. Three PH patients treated with EBRT+ILBT developed gastrointestinal toxicities. With a minimum follow-up of 18 months, median survival times were 14 months (EHBD) and 11.5 months (PH); one of the seven PH patients is alive (29 months) and two of the EHBD patients are alive (18 and 43 months). All patients had satisfactory control of jaundice. CONCLUSIONS: The results in the EHBD patients suggest that the addition of ILBT after biliary drainage prolongs survival. Further experience is necessary to determine whether ILBT in the common bile duct and/or in the duct of Wirsung may be, in PH patients, an alternative boost technique to Interstitial Brachy-therapy (IBT) or Intraoperative Electron Beam Radiation Therapy (IOEBRT).

Abstract: Intraluminal brachytherapy (Il-BRT) consists in the treatment of neoplasms by the positioning of radioactive sources in the lumen of cavitary organs such as the esophagus, the trachea, the bronchi and bile ducts. This procedure has been used to deliver relatively high doses of irradiation to bile duct and periampullary carcinomas while sparing the adjacent organs. Results of a number of reports appeared in the last fifteen years document the feasibility and tolerance of the procedure. Moreover these data seem to suggest that Il-BRT is able to prolong the survival of patients undergoing biliary drainage and that its use as boost dose in external beam radiotherapy (ERT) enhances the results of the latter. Combined ERT+Il-BRT is associated to an incidence of gastrointestinal ulcerations related to the total dose delivered. Better patient selection and standardization of reference dose represent prerequisites for testing this procedure in prospective randomized trials.

Abstract: Preliminary results of a planned follow-up schedule based on periodic clinicoinstrumental controls applied to a population of 73 patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing combined modality treatments modulated according to the different prognosis, are reported. The following considerations are stressed: 1) the feasibility of scheduled controls is confirmed by the low rate (1.4%) of patients lost to follow-up in spite of the rapidly fatal course of the disease, characterized by the deteriorating performance status in most patients; 2) radiologic exams should be performed in the same center where the patients were initially staged by a team experienced in the natural history of this disease and aware of the difficulties in assessing the treatment, surgery in particular; 3) supportive care plays a major role in patients followed-up for the frequent onset of symptoms which impact on the quality of life; 4) the interdisciplinary collaboration between surgeons, oncologists, radiotherapists, endoscopists and experts in nutrition and pain relief plays a major role.

Abstract: A series of studies carried out by the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group have shown the efficacy of the combination of external beam radiotherapy (ERT) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy (CHEM) in unresectable and resectable tumors of the exocrine pancreas. In the former in particular, this method was shown to be superior to ERT alone as well as to polychemotherapy alone. In these studies 5-FU was administered during (concomitant chemotherapy: C-CHEM) or after ERT (adjuvant chemotherapy: A-CHEM). This led several authors to consider this combined treatment as reference standard for pancreatic carcinoma. Its prognosis is still definitely poor because of the difficult local eradication as well as because of the frequent early distant spread, especially at the abdominal level (hepatic and peritoneal). An improvement of present results may stem from the combination of ERT+C-CHEM +/- A-CHEM with methods of dose intensification at the local level (e.g. IORT) concurrently with the use of treatments aiming at a better control of the abdominal spread (e.g. ERT+C-CHEM for prophylaxis of the liver or upper abdomen).

Abstract: The diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic ductal carcinoma are managed, in our hospital, by a team of radiologist, surgeons, radiotherapists and pathologists. In periodic meetings they discuss the clinical cases before and after clinico-radiologic staging. Patients are entered one of three different treatment routes, based on their general status, on disease stage, tumor size and its arrangement around common bile duct and main pancreatic duct. Thirty-eight patients were studied: 23 of them, considered as resectable on the basis of imaging (CT, US) findings, were submitted to radical surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy (route I); of 11 unresectable cases, 8 had a bilio-digestive bypass and interstitial brachitherapy with 125I seeds (tumor size < 3 cm). Eleven patients unresectable by imaging and 1 by surgery followed treatment route II, characterized by radio-chemotherapy followed by intraluminal radiotherapy with 192Ir wires, relative to residual tumor size and to lesion arrangement around access ways. Four patients with metastases and "adequate" tumor size entered treatment route III-i.e., merely palliative luminal radiotherapy. This preliminary note stresses the importance of polyspecialistic team work in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic ductal carcinomas.

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract: Since 1975, seven groups of investigators have reported clinical results of interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) for pancreatic cancer. The reports are comprised of data from 254 patients, 21 of whom died in the postoperative period for an overall operative mortality rate of 8.7%. Operative mortality rate range from 0% to 32% in individual reports. Most patients have been treated with 125I, although 25 patients were treated with 198Au seeds. Most investigators report combining IBT with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) +/- adjuvant chemotherapy. In general, IBT has been associated with considerable morbidity. Median patient survival time has not exceeded 15 months. This report describes an additional seven patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer, without distant metastases, treated primarily with 60 to 100 Gy matched peripheral dose (MPD) by 125I IBT. One patient died postoperatively of a pulmonary embolus. Four of the remaining six patients were also treated with modest doses (10.5 to 30 Gy) of EBRT late in the course of the disease for local tumor progression. One developed a pancreaticocutaneous fistula, and one developed exacerbation of pre-existing diabetes mellitus. The median patient survival time from the date of IBT was 7 months (range: 0 to 21 months). One patient is alive without clinical evidence of cancer 9 months after IBT.

Abstract: Between 1980 and 1988, 16 patients (9 females, 7 males) with malignant neuroepithelial tumors of the brain were treated by brachycurietherapy (BCT) and external radiation therapy (ERT) in a phase II nonrandomized study. There were 13 grade III and 3 grade IV tumors according to the WHO classification. Five patients in the grade III group who showed anaplastic foci in a generally grade II background were separately examined. Six patients received only BCT whereas 10 patients were treated by a combination of BCT and ERT, according to the tumor volume. We utilized as radioactive sources 192Ir in 14 cases and 125I in 2. Thirteen patients underwent permanent implant, 3 others received temporary irradiation with removable afterloaded catheters. The target volume was less than 50 cc in 8 cases, between 50 and 100 cc in 7, and larger than 100 cc in 1 patient. The total dose at the periphery of these volume ranged between 70 and 144 Gy. The result were analyzed referring to the following aspects: performance status, survival, side effects, grading. The impact of BCT was analyzed especially in a grade III with anaplastic foci group which showed a median survival of 6 years compared with only 2 years median survival of the pure grade III group.

Abstract: Between February 1981 and September 1989, 144 patients with rectal cancer were treated according to a radiosurgical sandwich protocol (27Gy + surgery + 18Gy) or postoperative radiotherapy (45Gy) at the University Hospital 'A. Gemelli' in Rome. This group is compared with a group of 133 patients operated on between January 1968 and January 1981, by the same team of surgeons but who received no radiotherapy. The historical group is comparable to the radiosurgical group in terms of stage, histology, and surgical procedures. The median follow-up period of the radiosurgical group is 38 months and 68% of cases have been observed longer than 2 years. At 2 years local recurrence in the historical control group was 22% versus 17% in the prospective group (p = 0.8). For Stage C disease, local recurrence dropped from 54% to 35% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.3). Metastases were observed in 22% of the control group versus 13% of the radiosurgical group (p = 0.2). For Stage C disease the incidence of distant metastases dropped from 59% to 26% at 2 years with the use of the prospective radiosurgical protocol (p = 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival rate at 5 years was 46% for the historical group and 72% for the radiosurgical group (p = 0.003) (Stage A 71% & 94%, Stage B 48% & 77%, and Stage C 16% & 38%, respectively). Neither serious nor late toxicity has been detected in the radiotherapy group, nor were surgical complications observed in the pre-operative radiotherapy group. The data strongly suggest a survival advantage for patients treated with the radiosurgical combination (p = 0.003).

Abstract: