Vice President for Oncology at Takeda Global R&D (London). She received her MD degree and diploma of specialisatin in Oncology from the University of Genoa, Italy. She continued her medical training with residencies in medical oncology at the National Institute for Cancer Research (Genoa, Italy) and received fellowships at the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (Brussels, Belgium) and at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Dr Oliva has many years of experience in the clinical development of oncology drugs such as gemcitabine (lung cancer) and lapatinib (breast cancer). She is currently responsible for Takeda Oncology 's clinical development in Europe.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Lapatinib Expanded Access Program (LEAP) was designed to provide access to lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who previously received an anthracycline, a taxane, and a trastuzumab and had no other treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: LEAP opened globally and enrollment continued until lapatinib received regulatory approval in each participating country. Patients were assessed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and monitored for serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: As of 30 September 2008, 4283 patients from 45 countries enrolled in LEAP. The median treatment duration was 24.7 weeks. The most common drug-related SAEs were diarrhea (9.7%), vomiting (4.3%), and nausea (2.4%) and were mainly grade 3 or higher. The incidences of special interest SAEs were decreased left ventricle ejection fraction (0.5%), interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (0.2%), and serious hepatobiliary events (0.4%). This safety profile is consistent with the overall lapatinib program. The median PFS and OS were 21.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 20.1-22.3] and 39.6 (95% CI = 37.7-40.7) weeks, respectively (n = 4006). Subgroup analysis showed longer PFS and OS in patients who had not received prior capecitabine. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of lapatinib in a broader patient population compared with a clinical trial.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Brain metastases develop in one third of patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Effective therapy for patients with central nervous system (CNS) progression after cranial radiation is extremely limited and represents a major clinical challenge. Lapatinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor/HER2 inhibitor, was associated with regressions of CNS lesions in a small phase 2 trial. The current study was done to further evaluate the CNS activity of lapatinib. The study was later amended to allow patients who progressed on lapatinib the option of receiving lapatinib plus capecitabine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients had HER2+ breast cancer, progressive brain metastases, prior trastuzumab, and cranial radiotherapy. The primary end point was CNS objective response, defined as >or=50% volumetric reduction of CNS lesion(s) in the absence of increasing steroid use, progressive neurologic signs and symptoms, or progressive extra-CNS disease. RESULTS: Two-hundred and forty-two patients entered the study. CNS objective responses to lapatinib were observed in 6% of patients. In an exploratory analysis, 21% of patients experienced a >or=20% volumetric reduction in their CNS lesions. An association was observed between volumetric reduction and improvement in progression-free survival and neurologic signs and symptoms. Of the 50 evaluable patients who entered the lapatinib plus capecitabine extension, 20% experienced a CNS objective response and 40% experienced a >or=20% volumetric reduction in their CNS lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the modest CNS antitumor activity of lapatinib. Additional responses were observed with the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine. Further studies of lapatinib-based regimens for CNS metastases from HER2+ breast cancer are warranted.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Lapatinib is a dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) with activity in HER2-amplified metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Its role in non-HER2-amplified MBC remains unclear. EGF30001, a phase III trial of lapatinib and paclitaxel versus paclitaxel and placebo, demonstrated lapatinib does not significantly benefit HER2-negative or HER2-unselected patients with MBC. Published data support interactions between steroid hormone and peptide growth factor signaling. We hypothesized that molecular subgroups may exist within EGF30001 that would benefit from lapatinib. METHODS: A blinded, retrospective biomarker evaluation was performed using immunohistochemistry to semiquantitate estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and EGFR expression. HER2 amplification was determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Effects of these biomarkers on event-free survival (EFS) were examined in patients with available tissue (n = 493). RESULTS: Lapatinib improved median EFS in HER2-amplified, ER- or PR-positive MBC (n = 36; 5.7 v 4.5 months; P = .351); benefit was greater and statistically significant in HER2-amplified, ER-negative, PR-negative MBC (n = 42; 8.3 v 5.0 months; P = .007). In HER2-negative, ER-positive MBC, median EFS improvement varied by degree of PR expression (H-score): no benefit if PR-strong (n = 133; 9.3 v 7.3 months; P = .373), benefit if PR-weak (n = 50; 7.3 v 2.4 months; P = .026), and potential antagonism if PR-negative (n = 40; 3.7 v 7.2 months; P = .004). No benefit was seen in triple-negative MBC (n = 131; median EFS, 4.6 v 4.8 months; P = .255). EGFR expression was not correlated with benefit from lapatinib. CONCLUSION: Although subgroups are small, these analyses support the hypothesis that semiquantitative determination of hormone receptor status may be a surrogate for EGFR and/or HER2 dependency.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Cross-talk between human epidermal growth factor receptors and hormone receptor pathways may cause endocrine resistance in breast cancer. This trial evaluated the effect of adding lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with HR-positive MBC were randomly assigned to daily letrozole (2.5 mg orally) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg orally) or letrozole and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the HER2-positive population. Results In HR-positive, HER2-positive patients (n = 219), addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression versus letrozole-placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; P = .019); median PFS was 8.2 v 3.0 months, respectively. Clinical benefit (responsive or stable disease >or= 6 months) was significantly greater for lapatinib-letrozole versus letrozole-placebo (48% v 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P = .003). Patients with centrally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors (n = 952) had no improvement in PFS. A preplanned Cox regression analysis identified prior antiestrogen therapy as a significant factor in the HER2-negative population; a nonsignificant trend toward prolonged PFS for lapatinib-letrozole was seen in patients who experienced relapse less than 6 months since prior tamoxifen discontinuation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P = .117). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the lapatinib-letrozole arm versus letrozole-placebo arm (diarrhea, 10% v 1%; rash, 1% v 0%, respectively), but they were manageable. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that a combined targeted strategy with letrozole and lapatinib significantly enhances PFS and clinical benefit rates in patients with MBC that coexpresses HR and HER2.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Lapatinib is a small molecule, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2). Initial results of a phase III trial demonstrated that lapatinib plus capecitabine is superior to capecitabine alone in women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer that progressed following prior therapy including trastuzumab. Updated efficacy and initial biomarker results from this trial are reported. METHODS: Women with HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-, taxane-, and trastuzumab-containing regimens were randomized to lapatinib 1,250 mg/day continuously plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle or capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2) on the same schedule. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) as determined by an independent review panel. Relationship between progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor HER2 expression and serum levels of HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) were assessed. RESULTS: 399 women were randomized. The addition of lapatinib prolonged TTP with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.43-0.77; P < 0.001) and provided a trend toward improved overall survival (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.55-1.12, P = 0.177), and fewer cases with CNS involvement at first progression (4 vs. 13, P = 0.045). Baseline serum HER2 ECD did not predict for benefit from lapatinib. CONCLUSION: The addition of lapatinib to capecitabine provides superior efficacy for women with HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer progressing after treatment with anthracycline-, taxane-, and trastuzumab-based therapy. Biomarker studies could not identify a subgroup of patients who failed to benefit from the addition of lapatinib to capecitabine.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To characterize diarrhea events in patients with cancer treated with lapatinib as monotherapy or in combination with capecitabine or taxanes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven clinical trials (phase I, II, or III) in patients with metastatic cancer were analyzed. Lapatinib was administered at doses ranging from 1,000 to 1,500 mg/day as monotherapy (n = 926) or in combination with capecitabine (n = 198) or taxanes (n = 687). Diarrhea events were characterized based on severity, time to onset, duration, required interventions, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In the pooled analysis of nine studies, diarrhea occurred in 55% of lapatinib-treated patients and 24% of patients not receiving lapatinib. All grade diarrhea occurred in 51% of patients treated with lapatinib monotherapy and 65% treated with lapatinib plus capecitabine. In a separate analysis, 48% of patients treated with lapatinib plus a taxane experienced diarrhea. Overall, most diarrhea events were grade 1/2. Grade 3 events occurred in <10% of patients and grade 4 events were rare (<or=1%). Most diarrhea events resolved with conventional approaches and without dose modification. Approximately 40% of patients treated with lapatinib monotherapy or combination therapy experienced a first diarrhea event within 6 days of treatment initiation, with a median duration of 7-9 days. Lapatinib-containing chemotherapy regimens do not cause severe diarrhea when proactive monitoring and intervention is introduced. CONCLUSION: Most diarrhea events in lapatinib-treated patients are low grade, requiring infrequent lapatinib dose modification or interruption. Proactive management of diarrhea is crucial to prevent more serious complications in lapatinib-treated patients.
Abstract: Many hormone receptor-positive tumors show primary or acquired resistance, possibly because of a crosstalk with other growth factor-related transduction pathways (mainly epidermal growth factor receptor family related). The LETLOB study is a European multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial in postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative, stage II-IIIA (T > 2 cm, N0-1, M0) breast cancer, in which letrozole or the combination of letrozole plus lapatinib will be administered for 6 months before surgery. Clinical endpoints (primary [ultrasonographic objective response], secondary [rate of pathologic complete response and of conservative surgery, safety, and time to treatment failure], and biologic [inhibition of intermediate and final biomarkers of the proliferative and apoptosis pathways and gene profile correlation with response]) will be evaluated.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Biomarkers from two randomized phase III trials were analyzed to optimize selection of patients for lapatinib therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In available breast cancer tissue from EGF30001 (paclitaxel +/- lapatinib in HER-2-negative/unknown metastatic breast cancer, n = 579) and EGF100151 (capecitabine +/- lapatinib in HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer, n = 399), HER-2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), HER-2 mRNA by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), HER-2 protein expression by HercepTest immunohistochemistry (IHC), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mRNA level by RT-PCR, and EGFR protein by IHC were analyzed and compared with clinical outcome. HER-2 was determined by FISH in an academic reference/research laboratory and in a large, high-volume commercial reference laboratory. RESULTS: The HER-2 gene was amplified in 47% (344 of 733) and IHC was 3+ in 35% (279 of 798), with significant correlation (P < 0.01) between FISH and IHC. Positive EGFR immunostaining (IHC 1+, 2+, or 3+) in 28% (213 of 761) correlated with EGFR mRNA levels by RT-PCR (r = 0.59; P < 0.01). HER-2 gene amplification/overexpression was associated with improved clinical outcomes (progression-free survival; P < 0.001) in both trials. A significant improvement in outcome was seen in FISH-positive and IHC 0, 1+, or 2+ patients. HER-2 mRNA expression correlated with HER-2 FISH (r = 0.83) and IHC status (r = 0.72; n = 138). No correlation was found between EGFR expression (IHC or mRNA) and responsiveness to lapatinib regardless of HER-2 status. Although a significant correlation with lapatinib responsiveness was observed among "HER-2-negative" breast cancer patients in the large, high-volume commercial reference laboratory, this was not confirmed in the academic reference/research laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: Women with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer benefit from lapatinib, whereas women with HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer derive no incremental benefit from lapatinib.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2/ErbB2), is effective against HER-2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase III trial evaluated the efficacy of lapatinib in HER-2-negative and HER-2-uncharacterized MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with MBC were randomly assigned to first-line therapy with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks plus lapatinib 1,500 mg/d or placebo. A preplanned retrospective evaluation of HER-2 status was performed using fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP); secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population (n = 579), there were no significant differences in TTP, EFS, or OS between treatment arms, although differences in ORR and CBR were noted. In 86 HER-2-positive patients (15%), treatment with paclitaxel-lapatinib resulted in statistically significant improvements in TTP, EFS, ORR, and CBR compared with paclitaxel-placebo. No differences between treatment groups were observed for any end point in HER-2-negative patients. The most common adverse events were alopecia, rash, and diarrhea. The incidence of diarrhea and rash was significantly higher in the paclitaxel-lapatinib arm. The rate of cardiac events was low, and no difference was observed between treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Patients with HER-2-negative or HER-2-untested MBC did not benefit from the addition of lapatinib to paclitaxel. However, first-line therapy with paclitaxel-lapatinib significantly improved clinical outcomes in HER-2-positive patients. Prospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this combination is ongoing in early and metastatic HER-2-positive breast cancer patients.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Lapatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2, also referred to as HER2/neu) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is active in combination with capecitabine in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after trastuzumab-based therapy. In this trial, we compared lapatinib plus capecitabine with capecitabine alone in such patients. METHODS: Women with HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after treatment with regimens that included an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy (lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg per day continuously plus capecitabine at a dose of 2000 mg per square meter of body-surface area on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle) or monotherapy (capecitabine alone at a dose of 2500 mg per square meter on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle). The primary end point was time to progression, based on an evaluation by independent reviewers under blinded conditions. RESULTS: The interim analysis of time to progression met specified criteria for early reporting on the basis of superiority in the combination-therapy group. The hazard ratio for the independently assessed time to progression was 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.71; P<0.001), with 49 events in the combination-therapy group and 72 events in the monotherapy group. The median time to progression was 8.4 months in the combination-therapy group as compared with 4.4 months in the monotherapy group. This improvement was achieved without an increase in serious toxic effects or symptomatic cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Lapatinib plus capecitabine is superior to capecitabine alone in women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer that has progressed after treatment with regimens that included an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00078572 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, a pyrimidine antimetabolite, in the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. 35 patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract previously treated with a platinum-based regimen were studied. Gemcitabine was administered at a dosage of 1200 mg/m2 as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 28 days. 31 patients were evaluable for efficacy. 4 patients achieved a complete response (12.9%), 3 a partial response (9.6%) and 13 (42%) were stable for at least 4 weeks (overall response 22.5%; 95% confidence interval 8-37%). The median response duration was 11.8 months (range 3.6-17.7 + months) and median survival for all patients entered was 5 months (range 2-21 + months). 2 patients with complete response are still alive with no evidence of disease after 14 and 21 months. Gemcitabine also provided subjective symptomatic relief from pain, cystitis, dysuria, haematuria and peripheral oedema. Patients experienced little WHO grade 3-4 toxicity, with anaemia in 8 patients (23%), thrombocytopenia in 5 (14.2%), leucopenia in 4 (11.4%) and neutropenia in 7 (20%). WHO grade 3-4 hepatic toxicity occurred in 4 patients (11.4%) and transient elevations of transaminase was noted in 3 (8.6%). No patient had WHO grade 3-4 elevation of serum creatinine level. There was no WHO grade 4 symptomatic toxicity and no alopecia was noted. Transient influenza symptoms with gemcitabine occurred in 18 patients (51.4%) with 13 patients (37.1%) experiencing fever (2.9% WHO grade 3). In conclusion, gemcitabine is an new active agent for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder with a mild toxicity profile; it warrants further investigation in combination with cisplatin in chemotherapy naive patients.
Abstract: Gemcitabine (GEM) is a novel nucleoside analogue with a unique mechanism of action. Preliminary studies have shown a mild, schedule-dependent toxic profile with a broad range of MTDs and promising antitumor activity in various solid tumors. This phase I study describes the infusion length-effect relationships of low- (300 mg/m2) and high-dose (875 mg/m2) GEM, administered on days 1, 8 and 15 at 4-week intervals in a step-wise escalation of duration (> or = 33%) at a starting level of 60 minutes. At least 3 patients entered each infusion-level step and 3 more cases were treated in the presence of significant toxicity. Conservative criteria for toxicity were employed, including treatment delay until recovery with infusion de-escalation in the subsequent course. Forty-seven patients (29 at low- and 18 at high-dose GEM levels) with various solid tumors, including 9 (taken as a reference) who had received the same dose levels over 30 min. entered the study. All but 9 patients (with pancreatic cancer) had been previously treated with chemotherapy and all had extensive visceral disease. A striking infusional-effect relationship was observed at both GEM dose levels. Four escalation steps were required to define the maximum tolerated infusion time (MTIT) at 6 hours for 300 mg/m2 GEM, with leucopenia being dose-limiting. At 875 mg/m2, although no limiting toxicity was observed (in spite of increased severity of leucopenia), no escalation was attempted following the 1-hour infusion, due to the limiting rate (58% of 12 patients) of toxic delay requiring shorter infusions. Toxicity was usually mild (no grade 4 event was recorded) showing the usual profile, although there was a trend towards increased non-hematologic toxicity (i.e. LFT abnormalities) as compared with the MTD previously defined using a 30-min. infusion schedule (1,370 mg/m2). Eight patients achieved a PR: 1 with NSCLC, 1 with gastric and 2 with bladder cancer at 300 mg/m2 (1 with a 3- and 3 with a 6-hour infusion) and 2 with pancreatic, 1 with cervical and another with bladder cancer at 875 mg/m2 (all but one with a 1-hour infusion). These data clearly suggest that the infusion duration is an important independent factor that influences the clinical effects of GEM. The present study not only defined the toxic profiles and the MTITs of the selected dose levels but demonstrated that GEM retained the antitumor activity at doses as small as 300 mg/m2 when given as a prolonged infusion. Further studies should clarify the underlying mechanism(s) responsible for the erratic dose-effect dose-effect relationships of GEM and establish the optimal dose-infusion level in the treatment of solid tumors.
Abstract: PURPOSE: The nucleoside analog, gemcitabine, has shown activity as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its combination with cisplatin in preclinical models suggested synergy between the two drugs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of the cisplatin-gemcitabine combination in advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive previously untreated NSCLC patients entered the trial from January to June 1994. The median age was 60 years (range, 37 to 70) and performance status (PS) was 0 or 1; 22 patients had unresectable stage III disease (21 stage IIIB and one stage IIIA) and 26 had stage IV disease. Gemcitabine 1 g/m2 was administered weekly (days 1, 8, and 15) followed by a 1-week rest and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2 of each 28-day cycle. Survival and response were determined in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle in all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Of 48 assessable patients, one (stage IV) had a complete response (CR) and 25 achieved a partial response (PR). The overall response rate was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 68%). Thrombocytopenia was the main side effect, with 52% of patients experiencing grade III to IV toxicity, which was usually short-lived and responsible for the omission of gemcitabine administration on day 15 in 50% of chemotherapy courses. The median survival time was 61.5 weeks (95% CI, 40 to 71). CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin induced a high response rate in both stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, with modest side effects. The regimen deserves further careful evaluation in a phase III prospective randomized trial.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is evidence that continuous infusion allows the delivery of higher doses of a drug while reducing the incidence of neurologic and renal toxicity. To verify prior to phase II testing the feasibility of ambulatory treatment with high-dose ifosfamide/mesna by continuous infusion in adult solid tumours, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the non-haematological dose-limiting toxicities for the achievement of 2 courses of therapy were determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced solid tumours were given continuous-infusion ifosfamide, from 9 to 16 g/m2, over 4 consecutive days, with equidose mesna uroprotection and granulocyte colony-stimulating-factor support; courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Total dose/course was escalated by 1 g/m2, in cohorts of 3 to 5 patients until the MTD was determined. RESULTS: At 16 g/m2, the dose-limiting toxicity was renal, with 2 of the 5 patients treated developing renal failure. Haematological toxicity was dose-related and significant at higher dosages, but generally surmountable. Ifosfamide at 15 g/m2/course with mesna uroprotection was identified as the MTD. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that high-dose continuous-infusion ifosfamide, administered by portable infusion pumps, is feasible in an ambulatory regimen, with acceptable non-haematological toxicity and good patient compliance.
Abstract: Survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated in 129 advanced ovarian cancer patients, who achieved a macroscopic complete response (112 pathological complete response and 17 microscopic disease) at second-look after platinum-based combination chemotherapy with or without doxorubicin (DX). The impact on S and PFS of age, performance status (PS), stage, histology, grade (G), residual disease after first surgery (RD), chemotherapy regimen, disease status at second-look and consolidation therapy were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. In the 118 months observation period, median S and PFS were 81 and 34 months, respectively. Stage, G, RD, PS and disease status at second-look had significant impact on both S and PFS in univariate analysis, whereas consolidation therapy did not influence outcome. Cox's regression analysis showed that G, RD and PS had an independent impact on PFS. Test for interaction demonstrated no statistically significant relationship between RD, chemotherapy regimen and outcome. In conclusion, advanced ovarian cancer patients with macroscopically complete remission at second-look have a substantial risk of relapse after aggressive treatment. The risk of recurrence was estimated to be maximal in the first 3 years after restaging, and was correlated with poor PS, RD > 2 cm after first surgery and undifferentiated tumour.
Abstract: The stability of ifosfamide in Ringer lactate buffer solution either alone or mixed with mesna at 37 degrees C for a 7-day period was analyzed by HPLC. This study was performed to investigate the feasibility of continuous infusion of ifosfamide by a multiday pump in order to reduce the toxicity and to increase the production of active alkylating metabolites of the parent drug. The total decay of ifosfamide activity did not exceed 3.2% at day 7. We conclude that ifosfamide can be safely delivered in a 7-day infusion with no significant loss of activity.
Abstract: A retrospective study was performed of the type of treatment used in 20 patients undergoing gynecological surgery in whom antibiotic prophylaxis with Mezlocillin (2 g i.v.) had failed. Patients were subdivided into three groups: A) Initial therapy with Mezlocillin (8 patients, 2 g/die i.m.) or Cefotetan (2 patients, 2 g/die i.m.) and subsequent addition of Gentamicin (8 patients, 240 mg/die i.m.) or Tobramycin (2 patients, 200 mg/die i.m.) and subsequently Metronidazole (7 patients, 1.5 g/die per os). B) Therapy with Imipenem/Cilastatin (6 patients, 1.5 g/die i.m.). C) Therapy with Imipenem/Cilastatin (4 patients, 1.5 g/die i.m.) after a variety of antibiotics: Cotrimoxazole (Trimethoprim 160 mg/die and sulphamethoxazole 800 mg/die per os), Pefloxacin (800 mg/die per os), Cefotetan (2 g/die i.m.) and Mezlocillin (2 g/die i.m.). Time taken to lower temperature was shorter in Group B (3.5 days) compared to Group A (6.8 days) and Group C (10 days). Postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in Group B (9 days) compared to Group C (16.5 days) and Group A (11.1 days). The immediate administration of an antibiotic active against Gram+ and Gram- germs, aerobes and anaerobes is therefore useful in the event of failure of antibiotic prophylaxis, rather than the use in succession of associations of antibiotics with a limited spectrum.
Abstract: It has been demonstrated that the prognosis of ovarian cancer is influenced by the dose intensity of cytotoxic treatment. The impact of received dose intensity of platinum-based combination chemotherapy on disease outcome was analysed in 226 stage III-IV ovarian cancer patients entered into two prospective randomised trials. All patients received either cisplatin or carboplatin and cyclophosphamide with or without doxorubicin for six courses after primary surgery. The impact of the received dose intensity of each drug (RDI), the average received dose intensity of the treatment regimen (ARDI) and the relative total drug dose (RTD) on progression-free survival (PFS) and survival were analysed. In the 198 patients receiving the full six courses of treatment, RDI of cisplatin or carboplatin, ARDI and RTD were > 0.76 in 74.2, 61.1 and 65.1% of cases, respectively. Although the differences were not significant, pathological complete response was more frequently observed in the group of patients with ARDI < 0.75, whereas the partial response rate was higher in the ARDI > or = 0.76 group. Median survival and PFS were 19 and 13 months; 22 and 10 months; 23 and 13 months for the groups of patients receiving chemotherapy at a ARDI of < 0.75, > or = 0.76-0.99 and > 1.00, respectively (P = not significant). It appears that modest dose modifications and brief treatment delays during first-line platinum-based chemotherapy do not affect response rate, survival and PFS in advanced ovarian cancer patients.
Abstract: The cytotoxic activity of human recombinant tumor necrosis factor (rHuTNF) (from 0.01 to 10000 U/ml) was assayed on six human ovarian cancer cell lines and one human cervical carcinoma cell line using a crystal violet assay. rHuTNF was cytotoxic to four cell lines (A2780, A2774, SW626, PA1), while 3 cell lines (IGROV1, SKOV3, Me180) were marginally sensitive to its activity. However, under the same experimental conditions rHuTNF markedly enhanced the cytotoxicity of mitoxantrone, a chemotherapeutic drug targeted at DNA topoisomerase II, in six cell lines. The potentiation of mitoxantrone cytotoxicity was not caused by increased drug accumulation after rHuTNF treatment. No significant increase in cytotoxicity to Me180 cell line was seen when rHuTNF was added to mitoxantrone.
Abstract: In 221 patients with FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma, the impact on survival of age at diagnosis, menopausal status, FIGO stage, myometrial invasion, tumor grade and histology was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. At a median follow-up of 50 months (range 45-210), 42 patients had died, and therefore overall survival was 81% (179/221). Univariate analysis showed that age, menopausal status and histology did not influence survival, whereas FIGO stage, myometrial invasion and tumor grade were important prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor grade had a significant and independent impact on survival and confirmed that FIGO stage is the most important parameter influencing survival.
Abstract: 87 patients with high risk of recurrence FIGO stage I and II ovarian carcinoma were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days for 6 courses. Toxicity and efficacy of the regimen was evaluated after a median follow-up of 45 months. Treatment-related toxicity was mild and reversible, consisting chiefly of acute WHO grade 2 myelosuppression (10% of patients) and controllable grade 3 emesis (55%). No late toxicity was observed. Actuarial 7-year survival and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 76% and 61%, respectively; a statistically significant difference in outcome was observed for undifferentiated grade tumour (G1 vs. G2 vs. G3: P less than 0.01) but not for FIGO stage disease (stage I vs. stage II). In our opinion, short-term chemotherapy including the most active single agent, i.e. cisplatin, appears a tolerable and effective treatment which deserves further evaluation in large randomised trials.
Abstract: Twenty-four patients with severe post-chemotherapy emesis (greater than 15 emetic episodes) refractory to prior combination antiemetic therapy were treated with a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron (GR38032F). Ondansetron was given as 8 mg three times daily orally for 5 days with the first dose given 1 h prior to chemotherapy. Control of emesis was evaluated over the 5-day period. All chemotherapy was administered on an outpatient basis. Worst day analysis of antiemetic response was 87.5%: complete protection in 9/24 patients (37.5%) and major protection (1-2 emetic episodes) in 12/24 patients (50%). No protection from emesis was observed in 3 patients (12.5%). No side effects and no alterations in liver function tests were observed. Ondansetron is a safe and highly effective antiemetic agent.
Abstract: In ovarian cancer patients intraperitoneal chemotherapy confers pharmacokinetic advantages and appears an attractive way to improve the efficacy of certain antineoplastic agents. Intraperitoneal carboplatin and interferon alpha have been separately evaluated in ovarian cancer "with promising results". We report a phase I-II pilot trial of intraperitoneal carboplatin 400 mg/sqm plus interferon alpha 25 x 10(6) U q 28 d in 16 patients (pts) previously treated with intravenous cisplatin based chemotherapy. All the patients had relapsed (11 pts) or refractory (5 pts) disease; residual tumors were less than 2 cm in 10 pts and greater than 2 cm in 6 pts. Local and general toxicities were moderate, with neither WHO grade 4, nor neurotoxicity and ototoxicity. Myelotoxicity was the most frequent side effect. Among 14 evaluable pts, objective responses were observed in 6 pts (42.8%) including 3 pts with pathologically confirmed complete response (21.4%); six more pts presented prolonged disease-free survival. Response occurred in both categories of pts with greater than or less than 2 cm residual disease, also in pts refractory to prior intravenous cisplatin. The proper role of intraperitoneal treatment cannot be exactly defined without large randomized trials designed to compare intraperitoneal to intravenous drug administrations.
Abstract: The efficacy of the serotonin antagonist ondansetron (GR38032F, Glaxo) was evaluated in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by combinations containing cyclophosphamide (CTX) greater than or equal to 600 mg/m2 IV day. At their first treatment course, 55 patients (10 males, 45 females) median age 55 years (range 31-76) were given ondansetron 8 mg orally tds for a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 5 days. 54 patients were evaluable. Complete and major control of acute (day 1) emesis was observed in 94.5% of patients and acute nausea was graded as absent or mild in 83.3% of cases. Complete and major control of emesis improved on subsequent study days from 96.1% on study day 2 to 100% on study day 5. Side effects were mild. Ondansetron is a safe and effective antiemetic drug.
Abstract: The efficacy of the serotonin antagonist ondansetron (GR 38032F) was evaluated in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by CMF chemotherapy in 29 breast cancer patients. At their first treatment course of CMF, all given IV on day 1 q 21 days, patients were given oral antiemetic treatment as follows: ondansetron 8 mg, 2 h prior to CMF, repeated after 5 and 10 h the day of chemotherapy and then 8 mg tds for a minimum of 3 days to a maximum of 5 days following chemotherapy. At first course of CMF, complete protection from emesis and nausea was observed in 86.2% and 62% of patients, respectively. At subsequent CMF courses with ondansetron, complete control of emesis was observed in 80% of patients. Side effects were mild and no dystonic reactions were observed. Ondansetron represents an effective, safe, and easily administered outpatient regimen. The addition of a corticosteroid to ondansetron could further improve control of CMF-induced emesis.
Abstract: Eight factors were analyzed for prognostic significance in univariate analyses in a series of 76 women with stage IV ovarian carcinoma treated with combination chemotherapies including cisplatin or carboplatin. The clinical objective and pathologic complete response rates were 51.2% and 27.3%, respectively. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 15 and 7 months, respectively. No variables reached statistical significance. Trends toward better survival were noted for grades 1 and 2 for the adriamycin-containing regimen. Using progression-free survival as an end point, significant prognostic factors included complete clinical or pathologic response. Our data confirm that the standard approach is unlikely to modify the clinical outcome of stage IV ovarian cancer. New treatment modalities including high-dose-intensity regimens and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy delivered before surgery could improve clinical results. Moreover, biologic characterization of ovarian tumors may provide information to design specifically targeted treatment.
Abstract: In 100 ovarian cancer patients serum CA-125 was monitored during treatment and follow-up to verify the prognostic value of its pre-surgery marker level and the usefulness of the test for disease monitoring. A low pre-operative CA-125 was not associated with improved survival or progression-free survival. A significant survival advantage was evident for patients in whom the marker had decreased during treatment, compared to patients in whom the antigen remained unchanged or increased. In 40 patients CA-125 was measured before second look laparotomy: the marker was negative in 100% of patients in, pathological complete response and in 53.5% of patients with residual disease at second look. A marker increase was evident in 32 of 41 patients with either progressive or recurrent disease, and in 17 patients the CA-125 increase was documented from 1 to 9 months before clinical evidence of progression. The pre-operative level of CA-125 did not appear to be of prognostic value. However, the monitoring of CA-125 during treatment and follow-up can provide a reliable method of assessing response and prognosis. CA-125 monitoring is particularly useful for early detection of recurrence.
