Abstract: AIMS: Erectile dysfunction (ED) prevalence is usually based on questionnaires, too elaborate for daily practice. The single question for ED prevalence is unknown. Literature reports an independent association between ED and both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Whether routinely asking men with Type 2 diabetes (DM2) about ED identifies those at elevated risk for CVD is unknown. We assessed cardiovascular risk of DM2 men with ED. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study in primary care. During annual check-up, the practice nurse asked 1823 DM2 men: "Do you have erection problems? Yes/no." ED prevalence rate was calculated. Age, medication, and other known factors associated with ED and/or CVD were used in univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], Student's t test, and Mann-Whitney test). This revealed confounding variables used in the multivariable analysis. The association between ED and history of cardiovascular disease (HCVD) was assessed by logistic regression analysis. In patients with no HCVD, we assessed the association between ED and 10-year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) coronary heart disease risk by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of ED in DM2 patients was 41.3%. There was no independent association between ED and HCVD [adjusted OR, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9-1.5)]. The 10-year UKPDS CHD risk difference between men with and without ED was 5.9% (95% CI, 3.2-8.7), but after adjustment for age, this association disappeared [adjusted risk difference, 0.6% (95% CI, -1.5 to 2.7)]. CONCLUSION: The ED prevalence rate assessed by a single question was comparable to that assessed by questionnaires. ED neither did independently relate to patients' cardiovascular history nor to cardiovascular risk.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the short-term effects of an educational program on (determinants of) self-reported health-seeking behavior for infections of the urinary tract (UTIs) and lower respiratory tract (LRTIs) in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 1,124 patients with type 2 diabetes aged between 44 and 85 years participated. The intervention consisted of a multifaceted educational program with an interactive meeting, a leaflet, a Web site, and a consultation with the diabetes care provider. The program focused on the needs of patients, apparent from a prior focus group and questionnaire study. The primary outcome measure was an indicator of health-seeking behavior for UTIs and LRTIs, defined as the proportion of participants with a positive score on at least seven of nine determinants, six from the Health Belief Model and the additional three domains of knowledge, need for information, and intention. The primary outcome was measured with questionnaires at baseline and after 5 months. RESULTS: Complete outcome data were available for 468 intervention group patients and 472 control group patients. In all, 68% of the intervention group patients attended the meeting. At baseline, 28% of the participants from the intervention group had a positive score on seven of the nine determinants, compared with 27% from the control group. After the educational program, these percentages were 53 and 32%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our educational program positively influenced determinants of health-seeking behavior for common infections in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Abstract: This paper describes the development and first results of a brief self-management course for patients recently diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. The intervention incorporates elements from proactive coping and self-regulation theory in a five-step plan to help newly diagnosed patients formulate and carry out intentions with regard to their self-management. The theoretical framework and course program are described, patient evaluations are summarized and proximal outcomes of the course will be analyzed, investigating whether the course is able to increase patients' proactive skills, goal attainment and confidence in dealing with self-management issues. Participants included 180 patients, diagnosed 3-33 months previously during a population screening. Participants were randomized into an intervention (n = 78) or control group (n = 102). Course evaluations were very positive, regardless of patients' demographic or medical background and participants were particularly positive about the five-step plan and potential for peer interaction. Compared with the control group, course participants improved significantly in terms of proactive coping, goal achievement and self-efficacy. An intervention based on proactive coping appears to meet the needs of patients newly diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, teaching them new proactive skills, improving their goal achievement and increasing their self-efficacy in dealing with their self-management tasks.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Relatively few data are available to predict a complicated course of community-acquired complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients with diabetes type 2 (DM2). The aim of this study was to assess predictors for a complicated course of UTIs in DM2 patients in primary care. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study among DM2 patients aged over 45 years as part of an educational trial. The combined outcome measure was a complicated course of UTI, defined as a self-reported episode of acute pyelonephritis, prostatitis or recurrent cystitis in the 12 months before the trial. Patients with an outcome were all verified by review of medical records. A prediction model was derived with multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1151 trial participants, 94 (8%) had a self-reported community-acquired complicated course of UTIs and 62 (66%) of these were medically-attended. Independent predictors for a complicated course were age above 60 years (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-3.03), chronic use of antibiotics (adjusted OR: 5.50; 95% CI: 2.31-13.08), more than 6 physician contacts in previous year (adjusted OR: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.00-6.49), hospitalization in previous year (adjusted OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.00-1.85), renal disease (adjusted OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 1.59-15.18) and incontinence of urine (adjusted OR: 3.78; 95% CI: 1.93-7.38). Area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.78). Analysis according to medically attended complicated UTIs did not change our findings. CONCLUSION: Easily obtainable predictors from medical history can be used to accurately predict a complicated course of UTIs in DM2 patients.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate if disturbed glucose homeostasis or known diagnosis of diabetes was associated with depressive symptoms. The reason for the increased prevalence of depression in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is unknown. METHODS: Within the Utrecht Health Project, an ongoing longitudinal study among inhabitants of a residential area of a large city in The Netherlands, 4747 subjects (age: 39.4 +/- 12.5 years) were classified into four mutually exclusive categories: normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (<5.6 mmol/l), impaired FPG (> or =5.6 and <7.0 mmol/l), undiagnosed DM2 (FPG > or =7.0 mmol/l), and diagnosed DM2. Presence of depressive symptoms was defined as a score of > or =25 on the depression subscale of the Symptom Check List (SCL-90) or self-reported use of antidepressants. RESULTS: Diagnosed DM2 was associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms (odds ratio (OR) = 1.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.72) after adjustment for demographic and lifestyle variables. Additional adjustment for number of chronic diseases reduced the OR to 1.36 (95% CI 0.83-2.23). Impaired fasting glucose and undiagnosed DM2 were not associated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that disturbed glucose homeostasis is not associated with depressive symptoms. The increased prevalence of depressive symptoms among patients with diagnosed DM2 suggests that depressive symptoms might be a consequence of the burden of diabetes. The number of chronic diseases seems to explain part of the association between DM2 and depressive symptoms.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a theory-driven self-management course in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes, taking ongoing medical treatment into account. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 196 screen-detected patients, receiving either intensive pharmacological or usual-care treatment since diagnosis (3-33 months previously), were subsequently randomized to a control or intervention condition (self-management course). A 2 x 2 factorial design evaluated the behavioral intervention (self-management course versus control) nested within the medical treatment (intensive versus usual-care), using multilevel regression modeling to analyze changes in patients' BMI, A1C, blood pressure (BP), and lipid profiles over 12 months, from the start of the 3-month course to 9-month follow-up. RESULTS: The self-management course significantly reduced BMI (-0.77 kg/m2) and systolic BP (-6.2 mmHg) up until the 9-month follow-up, regardless of medical treatment. However, intensive medical treatment was also independently associated with lower BP, A1C, total cholesterol, and LDL before the course and further improvements in systolic BP (-4.7 mmHg). Patients receiving both intensive medical treatment and the self-management course therefore had the best outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This self-management course was effective in achieving sustained reductions in weight and BP, independent of medical treatment. A combination of behavioral and medical interventions is particularly effective in reducing cardiovascular risk in newly diagnosed patients.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: About 10 years ago, it was estimated that half of all people with diabetes were unrecognized. Since then, according to the national guidelines, case finding for diabetes in general practice has become common in the Netherlands, resulting in a substantial increase of the prevalence of known diabetes. Nevertheless, the need for population-based screening is advocated, especially by the national federation of diabetes patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of population-based screening for Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: From 2002 to 2004, we performed a four-step screening procedure [questionnaire, random glucose measurement, fasting glucose measurement and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)] and a three-step procedure (without random glucose measurement) in 79 general practices in the southwestern region of the Netherlands. RESULTS: A total of 56 978 non-diabetic subjects, aged 50-70 years, were asked to complete the questionnaire. Those with a score above threshold underwent further glucose testing. Eventually, 586 participants (1.0%) were diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes (in four-step procedure 285 subjects and in three-step procedure 301). Impaired glucose regulation was assessed in 1011 participants (1.8%). Dropout rate in the screening programme among participants who should undergo an OGTT was 23.4%. The risk score was higher if glucose metabolism was more disturbed. CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, the yield of population-based screening is low. The dropout among high-risk individuals was high. Given the decreasing prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and the possibility of opportunistic screening on a continuous basis, opportunistic screening for diabetes might be more appropriate than population-based screening. Further research on this topic is needed.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) is important in diabetes care. However, treating patients according to clinical guidelines appears to be difficult. Delegating routine tasks to a practice nurse combined with computerized decision support systems (CDSS) may be helpful. The objective was to study the effectiveness of practice nurse-managed CDSS for diabetes care on improving cardiovascular risk factors in DM2 patients. METHODS: In 113 primary care practices (n = 7,893 DM2 patients) across the Netherlands, the diabetes care protocol (DCP) was assessed in a before-after study, lasting 1 year. All practices implemented DCP, which is characterized by delegation of routine tasks in diabetes care to a practice nurse, software that supports diabetes management, medical decisions, and benchmarking (CDSS). All DM2 patients treated by their primary care physician were asked to attend the program. Primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving treatment targets: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <or=7%, blood pressure <or= 150/85 mm Hg, and total cholesterol <or= 5 mmol/L. RESULTS: The percentage of DM2 patients who achieved targets increased significantly, from 60.6% to 66.5% for HbA1c, from 48.7% to 61.9% for blood pressure, and from 47.4 % to 60.6% for total cholesterol. The percentage of patients achieving all three targets increased from 15.3% to 26.9% (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Delegating routine tasks in diabetes care to a practice nurse combined with CDSS and benchmarking helps achieve treatment goals for HbA1c, blood pressure, and cholesterol and reduce cardiovascular risk of DM2 patients in primary care.
Abstract: This study investigated whether the association between depression and diabetes was influenced by the presence of chronic somatic disease. To distinguish between depression and other psychosocial complaints, we studied the onset of diabetes in antidepressant (AD) users and benzodiazepine (BD) users, respectively. From the PHARMO database, which includes complete drug prescription data, we identified subjects using (i) no ADs and no BDs; (ii) AD but no BD; (iii) BD but no AD; and (iv) AD and BD. A total of 60 516 individuals (age: 45.5+/-17 years; 42.1% men) were followed from their first prescription for AD or BD until end of registration or a first prescription for antidiabetic drugs. The crude incidence rate in AD but no BD users was not increased compared with no AD and no BD users. After adjustment for age, sex and chronic diseases, the hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.05 (0.88-1.26) for AD but no BD users, 1.21 (1.02-1.43) for BD but no AD users and 1.37 (1.12-1.68) for AD and BD users compared with no AD and no BD users. We did not find an increased risk of diabetes in individuals using ADs. The association between BD use and diabetes was partly explained by chronic somatic comorbidity.
Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine reasons for nonparticipation and drop out in a diabetes self-management intervention. METHODS: A total of 468 recently screen-detected patients, receiving usual care or intensive pharmacological treatment, were invited and randomized into either a control or intervention condition, consisting of a brief self-management course. A nonresponse survey was conducted, and participants, nonparticipants, and dropouts were compared on sociodemographic variables, diabetes attitudes, and self-care. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients consented and were allocated to the control (n=108) or intervention group (n=119). Two hundred forty-one patients declined participation, 41 dropped out, and 78 completed the intervention. Major reasons for refusal and drop out were hesitancy toward research and practical barriers. Nonparticipants were less educated and reported higher self-management, while participation also varied by treatment and disease duration: intensively treated patients were more likely to participate in their first year, and usual-care patients participated more often 2 to 3 years after diagnosis. Dropouts had a lower education level but did not differ on any other measure. CONCLUSION: Participants, nonparticipants, and dropouts did not differ in their attitudes toward diabetes, but the intervention did attract patients with lower self-care. Variations in participation by treatment and disease duration suggest that patients prefer self-management interventions at different times depending on their medical treatment. Finally, education appears to be the most important factor determining participation. Alternative strategies are needed to attract and retain patients with low education.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of common infections in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) or type 2 (DM2). DESIGN: Prospective controlled study. METHODS: In a 12-month prospective cohort study as part of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice, 705 adult DM1 and 6,712 DM2 patients were compared with 18,911 control patients who had hypertension without diabetes. Outcome measures were medically-attended episodes of infections of the respiratory tract, urinary tract, skin and mucous membranes. Multivariate and multinomial logistic regression analysis was applied to determine independent risks of infections and their recurrence in patients with diabetes compared to controls. RESULTS: Upper respiratory-tract infections were as common in diabetes patients as in controls. Diabetes patients had a higher risk of lower respiratory-tract infections (DM2: odds ratio (OR): 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.52), urinary-tract infections (DM1: OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.13-2.15; DM2: OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.07-1.38), bacterial skin or mucous-membrane infections (DM1: OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01-2.15; DM2: OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.13-1.55) and mycotic skin or mucous-membrane infections (DM2: OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.24-1.61). The risk of recurrence of these common infections was seen to be increased. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type-1 and type-2 diabetes are at increased risk of lower respiratory-tract infections, urinary-tract infections and skin or mucous-membrane infections.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate how time since diagnosis and treatment intensity influence psychological outcomes in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 2 x 2 factorial cross-sectional design was used to examine psychological outcomes in 196 patients with screen-detected diabetes diagnosed 3-33 months previously who were receiving usual care or intensive multifactorial pharmacological treatment. Outcomes included anxiety, depression, diabetes-related distress, perceived seriousness and vulnerability, self-efficacy, and self-care. Multivariate analysis was used to examine variations in outcomes based on time since diagnosis (<1 vs. 2-3 years) and treatment intensity. RESULTS: Most patients reported little distress, low perceived seriousness and vulnerability, high self-efficacy, and low self-care, but outcomes varied considerably across conditions. Time effects were found for perceived vulnerability, which increases significantly with time since diagnosis. Time x treatment interactions were found for anxiety, diabetes-related distress, and self-efficacy; notably, intensively treated patients showed more distress and less self-efficacy in the 1st year, and usual-care patients reported more distress and less self-efficacy 2-3 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Screen-detected patients generally do not experience much difficulty with their condition in the first few years, but early and intensive treatment can influence patients' psychological outcomes, leading to relatively more anxiety and less self-efficacy in the 1st year after diagnosis but not necessarily improving self-care. This suggests that intensive treatments confront patients with their diabetes earlier on whereas milder treatments may delay confrontation. This finding should be taken into account in the development and timing of psychological interventions for patients with newly diagnosed diabetes.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Clinical data on the association of diabetes mellitus with common infections are virtually lacking, not conclusive, and often biased. We intended to determine the relative risks of common infections in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM1 and DM2, respectively). METHODS: In a 12-month prospective cohort study conducted as part of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice, we compared 705 adult patients who had DM1 and 6712 adult patients who had DM2 with 18,911 control patients who had hypertension without diabetes. Outcome measures were medically attended episodes of infection of the respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin and mucous membranes. We applied multivariable and polytomous logistic regression analysis to determine independent risks of infections and their recurrences in patients with diabetes, compared with control patients. RESULTS: Upper respiratory infections were equally common among patients with diabetes and control patients. Patients with diabetes had a greater risk of lower respiratory tract infection (for patients with DM1: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.42 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.96-2.08]; for patients with DM2: AOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.13-1.53]), urinary tract infection (for patients with DM1: AOR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.49-2.58]; for patients with DM2: AOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.10-1.39]), bacterial skin and mucous membrane infection (for patients with DM1: AOR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.12-2.24]; for patients with DM2: AOR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.15-1.54]), and mycotic skin and mucous membrane infection (for patients with DM1: AOR, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.97-1.84]; for patients with DM2: AOR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.27-1.63]). Risks increased with recurrences of common infections. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DM1 and DM2 are at increased risk for lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, and skin and mucous membrane infection. Studies are warranted into management of such infections in patients with diabetes.
Abstract: The typical form of acute gout can be clinically diagnosed. The term 'complicated gout' is used if there are more than three acute attacks of gout per year, tophi or urate stones in the urinary tracts. In the case of recurrent probable acute gout, a diagnostic fine needle aspirate from the joint during an attack is indicated. First choice treatment of acute gout consists of NSAIDs. Colchicine is the second choice treatment and the third choice treatment consists of corticosteroids. Excessive alcohol use should be limited. Treatment of chronic gout depends on the uric acid excretion in the 24-hour urine. If the level of excretion is too low, the first choice should be benzbromarone, and if the uric acid output is too high, allopurinol should be the treatment of first choice. Increased fluid intake is recommended; maintenance treatment with colchicine is not advised. Consultation with or referral to a rheumatologist is indicated in the case of doubt about the diagnosis of 'acute gout' or 'complicated gout', or (suspected) bacterial arthritis and insufficient treatment effect.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinimetric value of the Dutch version of the Foot Function Index (FFI) in comparison with the original FFI using verbal rating scales (FFI-5pt) rather than visual analog scales (VAS). METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 206 patients with nontraumatic forefoot complaints. Scoring, internal consistency, and construct validity of the FFI-5pt were compared with those of the original FFI, which rates all items on VAS. We also studied agreement between the scores at baseline and after one and 8 weeks and the scale scores with regard to sex, age, presence of osteoarthritis, limitation of mobility, bodily pain, and poor physical functioning (using SF-36). RESULTS: Some items were not applicable; removal of these items left 2 scales (Pain and Disability) with high internal consistency (alpha = 0.88 to 0.94) and good agreement between both versions (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.64 to 0.79). Principal component analysis with varimax rotation using a forced 2 factor model fitted well (65% explained variance). Test-retest reliability was high (ICC 0.70 to 0.83), while the stability over 8 weeks was lower, but still good (ICC 0.63 to 0.71). Responsiveness to change was low to moderate. However, a small number of patients reported an overall change (19%). Scores of patients with limited mobility and poor physical health (SF-36) were higher than those of patients with fewer physical problems, indicating good concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The FFI-5pt is a suitable generic measure. Its clinimetric properties are comparable with those of the original FFI. Its administration and data entry are less time consuming. However, responsiveness has to be more exactly assessed in an intervention study.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the possibility of improving glycaemic control in poorly regulated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM 2) through maximization of oral medication by the general practitioner followed by education and instruction in self-regulation by the diabetes nurse, as required. DESIGN: Explorative, descriptive, prospective cohort study. METHOD: 24 general practitioners selected all known patients with DM 2 and poor glycaemic control (HbA1c value > or = 8% and/or fasting blood glucose > 8 mmol/l), and maximized oral blood glucose lowering drugs if possible. When the HbA1c level remained > or = 8%, patients were referred to the diabetes nurse. RESULTS: In a population of 735 patients with DM 2 treated by the general practitioner, 146 patients were poorly regulated. Out of 112 patients with sub-maximal therapy, 50 achieved an HbA1c < 8% after adjustment of oral therapy. Of the 60 poorly regulated patients on maximum therapy, 39 were referred to the diabetes nurse. Nine of these patients subsequently achieved an HbA1c level < 8%. CONCLUSION: In 40% (50 + 9/146) of the poorly regulated patients with DM 2, improvement of glycaemic control could be achieved through optimization of oral therapy by the general practitioner and diabetes nurse, without exogen administered insulin.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: There are indications that the diagnosis and management of common foot problems vary widely in general practice. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to explore the variation of GPs' diagnosis and management of common foot problems and the possible correlation between GPs' characteristics and their competence to diagnose correctly. METHODS: In a cross-sectional design, 90 GPs in The Netherlands were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding seven vignettes with common foot problems (hallux valgus, hallux rigidus, fasciitis plantaris, tarsal tunnel syndrome, metatarsalgia, corns and calluses, and rheumatoid arthritis), combined with questions covering diagnoses, management options and some GP characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 72 GPs responded (80%). They most often diagnosed hallux valgus (79%) and rheumatoid arthritis (86%) correctly, and most often hallux rigidus (37%) and tarsal tunnel syndrome (74%) incorrectly. GP characteristics did not correlate with their competence in diagnosing. The most frequently suggested management was referral to a podiatrist. The referral rate to medical specialists was low, except in the case of rheumatoid arthritis (79%). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the GPs were competent in diagnosing vignettes of common foot problems. This diagnostic competence showed great variation and was not associated independently with GP characteristics. Educational programmes are recommended. Management showed less variation and often included referral to podiatrists. Further research into the effectiveness of specific treatments for different foot problems is recommended.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with the type of health care chosen by elderly people suffering from non-traumatic foot complaints. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey. SETTING: Population-based random sample of 7200 people aged > or = 65 years in The Netherlands. SUBJECTS: 1130 people > or = 65 years with non-traumatic foot complaints for 4 weeks or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of non-(para)medical care (i.e. no care at all, self-care and chiropodial care) versus (para)medical care (i.e. care given by paramedical personnel, general practitioners and medical specialists). RESULTS: Six of every 10 respondents sought (para)medical care, half of these visited the GP. Factors associated with the use of (para)medical care were foot-related limitations (adj OR 3.18; 95% CI 2.26-4.46), painful feet (adj OR 1.55; 1.09-2.23), and foot osteoarthritis (adj OR 1.88; 1.32-2.68). (Para)medical care was sought less often than non-(para)medical care for forefoot complaints (adj OR 0.56; 0.41-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly people with non-traumatic foot complaints did not seem to underreport their problems to (para)medical care providers. Furthermore, they appeared to select the appropriate type of care. Future studies will have to assess the effectiveness of the care provided.
Abstract: In a population-based cross-sectional survey conducted in the Netherlands of 7,200 people aged 65 years and older (with a response rate of 79%), 20% of the respondents were found to have nontraumatic foot complaints of more than 4 weeks' duration, often involving the forefoot. Female sex, joint disease, and multimorbidity were found to be risk factors for the presence of foot complaints; older age and obesity were not. Respondents with these complaints had limited mobility and poor perceived well-being.
