hosted by
publicationslist.org
    
D J Kruger

kruger@umich.edu

Journal articles

2009
 
DOI   
PMID 
Kruger, Lewis, Schlemmer (2009)  Mapping a Message for Faith Leaders: Encouraging Community Health Promotion With Local Health Data.   Health Promot Pract Jan  
Abstract: This study reports the use of a community-based health survey to share local health information with faith leaders. Geographical information systems software identified survey respondents within 2 km (1.25 miles) of places of worship. Results were tabulated for the community surrounding each place of worship and were compared with city- and county-level data. Faith leaders were presented with community-specific reports describing the health attributes of residents who lived in the surrounding area, in order to assist with the identification issues of concern and opportunities to develop health ministries to address these issues. Faith leaders were encouraged to share this information with members of their faith community and develop means of obtaining additional information on the people of interest. We believe that engaging faith leaders with neighborhood-specific health information will be critical in providing an understanding of the importance of their voice in improving health outcomes of their faith community, the surrounding neighborhood, and the community at large. Our goal is to empower faith leaders to understand personal and community health issues and to act as a conduit for health-related information and health promotion at a local level. Church health teams developed an HIV and sexually transmitted infection prevention program for African American adolescents and young adults.
Notes:
 
DOI   
PMID 
Daniel J Kruger, Lauren Shirey, Susan Morrel-Samuels, Stephen Skorcz, Janice Brady (2009)  Using a community-based health survey as a tool for informing local health policy.   J Public Health Manag Pract 15: 1. 47-53 Jan/Feb  
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Speak to Your Health! community survey is a biennial community-based survey designed and implemented by the Prevention Research Center of Michigan whose central mission is to strengthen the capacity of the community to improve health. METHOD: The survey was developed collaboratively by the university and community partners that comprise the Prevention Research Center of Michigan and focuses on health and social issues at the heart of the community of Genesee County, Michigan. FINDINGS: The results of this survey have been used to shape policy changes and strategic planning at the county health department and in local health intervention programs. CONCLUSIONS: This project has demonstrated that useful quantitative data for addressing local public health policy and planning can be collected using the principles of community-based research.
Notes:
2008
 
DOI   
PMID 
Daniel J Kruger, Jan S Brady, Lauren A Shirey (2008)  Using GIS to facilitate community-based public health planning of diabetes intervention efforts.   Health Promot Pract 9: 1. 76-81 Jan  
Abstract: Data from a community survey were analyzed geographically to help facilitate local diabetes prevention efforts. Data were available from the Speak to Your Health! Community Survey, designed and implemented by The Prevention Research Center of Michigan (PRC/MI), whose central mission is to strengthen community capacity to improve health. This survey was developed collaboratively by the university and community partners that comprise the PRC/MI and focuses on health and social issues at the heart of the community of Genesee County, Michigan. Survey data were used to calculate and geographically map diabetes-risk scores and mapped diabetes-screening rates. These maps indicated that those areas where the estimated risk of diabetes was the highest had only moderate rates of diabetes screening relative to other areas. It is hoped that these results will reach those involved in local diabetes-intervention programs with the intent that the data will be used in planning local prevention and intervention efforts.
Notes:
 
DOI   
PMID 
Katherine Alaimo, Elizabeth Packnett, Richard A Miles, Daniel J Kruger (2008)  Fruit and vegetable intake among urban community gardeners.   J Nutr Educ Behav 40: 2. 94-101 Mar/Apr  
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between household participation in a community garden and fruit and vegetable consumption among urban adults. DESIGN: Data were analyzed from a cross-sectional random phone survey conducted in 2003. A quota sampling strategy was used to ensure that all census tracts within the city were represented. SETTING: Flint, Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: 766 adults. VARIABLES MEASURED: Fruit and vegetable intake was measured using questionnaire items from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Household participation in a community garden was assessed by asking the respondent if he or she, or any member of the household, had participated in a community garden project in the last year. ANALYSIS: Generalized linear models and logistic regression models assessed the association between household participation in a community garden and fruit and vegetable intake, controlling for demographic, neighborhood participation, and health variables. RESULTS: Adults with a household member who participated in a community garden consumed fruits and vegetables 1.4 more times per day than those who did not participate, and they were 3.5 times more likely to consume fruits and vegetables at least 5 times daily. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Household participation in a community garden may improve fruit and vegetable intake among urban adults.
Notes:
 
DOI   
PMID 
Kruger, Morrel-Samuels, Davis-Satterla, Harris-Ellis, Slonim (2008)  Developing a Cross-Site Evaluation Tool for Diverse Health Interventions.   Health Promot Pract Dec  
Abstract: The Prevention Research Center of Michigan provided technical assistance for the evaluation of 10 projects funded by the Michigan Department of Community Health's (MDCH) Health Disparities Reduction Program. These projects varied considerably in focus, methodology, geographical coverage, and populations served. The authors developed a cross-site evaluation tool to complement the internal evaluations of the projects. The tool contains four sections based on priorities identified by MDCH: evidence-based practice, research-based learning/evaluation (including process, impact, and outcomes indicators), cultural competence, and sustainability. Recognizing the diversity of programmatic efforts and organizational evaluation capacity, the authors sought to enable each project to create the best evaluation possible given the resources and data available. Each section contains a range of components from basic questions to more advanced evaluation techniques. The instrument attempts to use the highest quality of information available for each project. This evaluation tool can be used by programs with diverse goals and methodology.
Notes:
2007
 
DOI   
PMID 
Daniel J Kruger, Thomas M Reischl, Gilbert C Gee (2007)  Neighborhood social conditions mediate the association between physical deterioration and mental health.   Am J Community Psychol 40: 3-4. 261-271 Dec  
Abstract: This study investigates how neighborhood deterioration is associated with stress and depressive symptoms and the mediating effects of perceived neighborhood social conditions. Data come from a community survey of 801 respondents geocoded and linked to a systematic on-site assessment of the physical characteristics of nearly all residential and commercial structures around respondents' homes. Structural equation models controlling for demographic effects indicate that the association between neighborhood deterioration and well-being appear to be mediated through social contact, social capital, and perceptions of crime, but not through neighborhood satisfaction. Specifically, residential deterioration was mediated by social contact, then, social capital and fear of crime. Commercial deterioration, on the other hand, was mediated only through fear of crime. Additionally, data indicate that the functional definition of a "neighborhood" depends on the characteristics measured. These findings suggest that upstream interventions designed to improve neighborhood conditions as well as proximal interventions focused on social relationships, may promote well-being.
Notes:
Powered by publicationslist.org.