hosted by
publicationslist.org
    

Letizia Nicoloso


letizia.nicoloso@unimi.it

Journal articles

2008
R Negrini, L Nicoloso, P Crepaldi, E Milanesi, R Marino, D Perini, L Pariset, S Dunner, H Leveziel, J L Williams, P Ajmone Marsan (2008)  Traceability of four European Protected Geographic Indication (PGI) beef products using Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) and Bayesian statistics   Meat Science 80: 1212-1217  
Abstract: The use of SNPs in combination with Bayesian statistics for the geographic traceability of cattle was evaluated using a dataset comprising 24 breeds from Italy, France, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Switzerland and UK genotyped with 90 polymorphic markers. The percentage of correct assignment of the individuals to their Country of origin was 90%, with an average assignment probability of 93% and an average specificity of 92%. The higher value was observed for UK breeds (97% of correct assignment) while Swiss animals were the most difficult to allocate (77% of correct assignment). Tracing of Protected Geographic Indication (PGI) products, the approach correctly assigned 100% of Guaranteed Pure Highland Beef; 97% of ‘‘Vitellone dell’Appennino Centrale” breeds; 84% of Ternera de Navarra, and 80% of Boeuf de Chalosse. Methods to verify Products of Designated Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographic Indication (PGI) products will help to protect regional foods and promote the economic growth of marginal rural areas by encouraging the production of high quality niche market foods.
Notes:
R Negrini, L Nicoloso, P Crepaldi, E Milanesi, L Colli, F Chegdani, L Pariset, S Dunner, H Leveziel, J L Williams, P Ajmone Marsan (2008)  Assessing SNP markers for assigning individuals to cattle populations   Animal Genetics 40: 18-26  
Abstract: The effectiveness of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for the assignment of cattle to their source breeds was investigated by analysing a panel of 90 SNPs assayed on 24 European breeds. Breed assignment was performed by comparing the Bayesian and frequentist methods implemented in the STRUCTURE 2.2 and GENECLASS 2 software programs. The use of SNPs for the reallocation of known individuals to their breeds of origin and the assignment of unknown individuals was tested. In the reallocation tests, the methods implemented in STRUCTURE 2.2 performed better than those in GENECLASS 2, with 96% vs. 85% correct assignments respectively. In contrast, the methods implemented in GENECLASS 2 showed a greater correct assignment rate in allocating animals treated as unknowns to a reference dataset (62% vs. 51% and 80% vs. 65% in field tests 1 and 2 respectively). These results demonstrate that SNPs are suitable for the assignment of individuals to reference breeds. The results also indicate that STRUCTURE 2.2 and GENECLASS 2 can be complementary tools to assess breed integrity and assignment. Our findings also stress the importance of a highquality reference dataset in allocation studies.
Notes:
Powered by PublicationsList.org.