Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Evidence regarding the influence of cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and patient characteristics on the growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is limited. We assessed, in an observational cohort study, rupture rates, risks of mortality, and the effects of cardiovascular risk factors and patient demographics on growth rates of small AAAs. METHODS: Between September 1996 and January 2005, 5057 patients with manifest arterial vascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors were included in the Second Manifestation of ARTerial disease (SMART) study. Measurements of the abdominal aortic diameter were performed in all patients. All patients with an initial AAA diameter between 30 and 55 mm were selected for this study. All AAA measurements during follow-up until August 2007 were collected. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to calculate the effects of demographic patient characteristics, initial AAA diameter, and cardiovascular risk factors on AAA growth. RESULTS: Included were 230 patients, with a mean age of 66 years and 90% were male. Seven AAA ruptures (six fatal) occurred in 755 patient years of follow-up (rupture rate 0.9% per patient-year). In 147 patients, AAA measurements were performed for a period of more than 6 months. The median follow-up time was 3.3 years (mean 4.0, range 0.5 to 11.1 years, standard deviation (SD) 2.5). Mean AAA diameter was 38.8 mm (SD 6.8) and mean expansion rate 2.5 mm/y. Patients using lipid-lowering drugs had a 1.2 mm/y (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.34 to -0.060 mm/y) lower AAA growth rate compared to nonusers of these drugs. Initial AAA diameter was associated with a 0.09 mm/y (95% CI 0.01 to 0.18 mm/y) higher growth rate per millimetre increase of the diameter. No other factors, including blood lipid values, were independently associated with AAA growth. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid-lowering drug treatment and initial AAA diameter appear to be independently associated with lower AAA growth rates. The risk of rupture of these small abdominal aortic aneurysms was low, which pleads for watchful waiting.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: New-onset trial fibrillation (AF) occurs commonly after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with a poor prognosis due to stroke or death. The optimal antithrombotic therapy is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, added to aspirin, reduced the risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke in patients who developed AF after their qualifying MI in the efficacy and safety of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in patients with recent myocardial damage (ESTEEM) trial. METHODS: The ESTEEM trial evaluated 6 months treatment with ximelagatran together with aspirin, compared to aspirin alone, for prevention of ischemic events in 1883 patients randomized within 14 days after an MI. After their qualifying MI, 174 (9%) patients developed AF in hospital. Multivariate hazard ratios for ximelagatran compared with placebo were calculated by presence AF. RESULTS: Of 101 patients with AF treated with ximelagatran 7 (6.9%) had either death, MI, or stroke, compared with 15 (20.6%) in 73 patients allocated to placebo. Ximelagatran reduced the risk of death, MI, or stroke by 70% (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.74). For the separate outcome events, we found similar, nonsignificant trends. One major bleeding event occurred in each treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with MI complicated by AF, the combination of aspirin and an oral direct thrombin inhibitor seems beneficial. The high risk for death, MI, and stroke in this population and the increasing use of percutaneous interventions in MI patients may suggest a combination of long-term antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Randomized clinical trials are warranted.
Abstract: The risk of major ulcer complications on treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is known to increase exponentially with age. However, in a pooled analysis of 12 trial arms, the incidence of endoscopic ulcers on treatment with NSAID was found to increase with age in a roughly linear fashion. Thus, it is concluded that increasing age is associated with both more frequent and more serious NSAID gastropathy.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) provides effective stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Optimisation of such therapy requires frequent monitoring, dose adjustments and stringent lifestyle restrictions. We conducted a large multinational survey in patients with chronic AF to gain insights into their perceptions and understanding of VKA use. METHODS: Eligible patients were adults with AF who had been prescribed VKAs for at least 1 year. A total of 711 patient interviews were conducted in seven European countries during June and July 2004. RESULTS: The majority of patients (58% male; mean age 68 years) claimed to understand their treatment programme; despite this, only 7% knew that VKA use is aimed at preventing strokes and 24% stated that they would have liked more information. Patients attended an average of 14 monitoring sessions in the previous year; however, 21% missed appointments, especially younger patients (<65 years). The International Normalized Ratio (INR) was within the target range in most or all of the last five to ten visits in 64% of patients; nonetheless, 38% were not aware that an INR outside the target range is associated with health risks. On average, patients required dose adjustments every four sessions. VKA treatment impacted 67% of patients in terms of diet, socialising, career and independence, especially younger patients (74%). CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring, dose adjustments and lifestyle restrictions to optimise the intensity of anticoagulation with VKAs are problematic for patients with AF, and their knowledge of the consequences of such therapy is often poor.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease is associated with a high incidence of cardiovascular mortality. Peripheral arterial disease can be detected by using the ankle-brachial index (ABI). This study assessed the prognostic value of the postexercise ABI in addition to the resting ABI on long-term mortality in patients with suspected peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study of 3209 patients (mean +/- SD age, 63 +/- 12 years; 71.1% male), resting and postexercise ABI values were measured and a reduction of postexercise ABI over baseline resting readings was calculated. The mean follow-up was 8 years (interquartile range, 4-11 years). RESULTS: During follow-up, 1321 patients (41.2%) died. After adjusting for clinical risk factors, lower resting ABI values (hazard ratio per 0.10 lower ABI, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.10), lower postexercise ABI values (hazard ratio per 0.10 lower ABI, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.11), and higher reductions of ABI values over baseline readings (hazard ratio per 10% lower ABI, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09-1.14) were significantly associated with a higher incidence of mortality. In patients with a normal resting ABI (n = 789), a reduction of the postexercise ABI by 6% to 24%, 25% to 55%, and greater than 55% was associated with a 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.2-2.2), 3.5-fold (95% CI, 2.4-5.0), and 4.8-fold (95% CI, 2.5-9.1) increased risk of mortality, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Resting and postexercise ABI values are strong and independent predictors of mortality. A reduction of postexercise ABI over baseline readings can identify additional patients (who have normal ABI values at rest) at increased risk of subsequent mortality.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the effect of cardiac medication on long-term mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Treatment guidelines recommend aggressive management of risk factors and lifestyle modifications. However, the potential benefit of cardiac medication in patients with PAD remains ill defined. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, 2,420 consecutive patients (age, 64 +/- 11 years, 72% men) with PAD (ankle-brachial index < or =0.90) were screened for clinical risk factors and cardiac medication. Follow-up end point was death from any cause. Propensity scores for statins, beta-blockers, aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, nitrates, coumarins, and digoxin were calculated. Cox regression models were used to analyze the relation between cardiac medication and long-term mortality. RESULTS: Medical history included diabetes mellitus in 436 patients (18%), hypercholesterolemia in 581 (24%), smoking in 837 (35%), hypertension in 1,162 (48%), coronary artery disease in 1,065 (44%), and a history of heart failure in 214 (9%). Mean ankle-brachial index was 0.58 (+/-0.18). During a median follow-up of eight years, 1,067 patients (44%) died. After adjustment for risk factors and propensity scores, statins (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36 to 0.58), beta-blockers (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.80), aspirins (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.84), and ACE inhibitors (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94) were significantly associated with a reduced risk of long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this observational longitudinal study, statins, beta-blockers, aspirins, and ACE inhibitors are associated with a reduction in long-term mortality in patients with PAD.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The beneficial effect of oral anticoagulants after infrainguinal venous bypass surgery is compromised by bleeding complications. We developed a model to identify patients, treated with anticoagulation, at risk of major haemorrhage and estimated whether this complication could have been prevented if patients had received aspirin. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial. METHODS: Data of patients who participated in the Dutch Bypass Oral Anticoagulation or Aspirin Study were reanalysed using Cox regression. After infrainguinal bypass surgery these patients were randomised to oral anticoagulants (n = 1326) or aspirin (n = 1324). RESULTS: Predictors of major haemorrhage for patients on oral anticoagulants were increased systolic blood pressure (> or = 140 mmHg, hazard ratio [HR] 1.62), age > or = 75 years (HR 2.77) and diabetes mellitus (HR 1.60). If the 345 patients in the highest risk quartile had received aspirin, major haemorrhages would have been reduced from 46 to 22, with no major changes in ischemic events and graft occlusions. In the subgroup with venous bypasses major haemorrhages would have been reduced from 27 to 13, at the cost of seven more ischemic events (mostly fatal) and 17 more graft occlusions. CONCLUSIONS: Treating patients at highest risk of major haemorrhage with aspirin instead of oral anticoagulants would have resulted in a reduction of non-fatal haemorrhages, but for venous bypasses this reduction was outweighed by an increase in ischemic events and graft occlusions. We still recommend treatment with oral anticoagulants after peripheral venous bypass surgery.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the consequences of occlusion of infrainguinal venous and prosthetic grafts. METHODS: In total, 2690 patients were included in the Dutch BOA study, a multicenter randomised trial that compared the effectiveness of oral anticoagulants with aspirin in the prevention of infrainguinal bypass graft occlusion. Two thousand four hundred and four patients received a femoropopliteal or femorodistal bypass with a venous (64%) or prosthetic (36%) graft. The incidence of occlusion and amputation was calculated according to graft material and the incidence of amputation after occlusion was compared with Cox regression to adjust for differences in prognostic factors. RESULTS: The indication for operation was claudication in 51%, rest pain in 20% and tissue loss in 28% of patients. The mean follow up was 21 months. After venous bypass grafting 171 (15%) femoropopliteal and 96 (24%) femorodistal grafts occluded. After prosthetic bypass grafting 234 (30%) femoropopliteal and 25 (38%) femorodistal grafts occluded. Patients with occlusions in the venous group had more severe ischemia, less runoff vessels and were older than the patients with prosthetic grafts. In the venous occlusion group 54 (20%) amputations were performed compared to 42 (16%) in the prosthetic occlusion group; crude hazard ratio 1.17 (95% CI 0.78-1.75). After adjustment for above mentioned differences in patient characteristics the hazard ratio was 0.86 (95% CI 0.56-1.32). CONCLUSION: The need for amputation after occlusion is not influenced by graft material in infrainguinal bypass surgery.
Abstract: This chapter about antithrombotic therapy for peripheral arterial occlusive disease is part of the seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs, and Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004;126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients with chronic limb ischemia, we recommend lifelong aspirin therapy in comparison to no antiplatelet therapy in patients with clinically manifest coronary or cerebrovascular disease (Grade 1A) and in those without clinically manifest coronary or cerebrovascular disease (Grade 1C+). We recommend clopidogrel over no antiplatelet therapy (Grade 1C+) but suggest that aspirin be used instead of clopidogrel (Grade 2A). For patients with disabling intermittent claudication who do not respond to conservative measures and who are not candidates for surgical or catheter-based intervention, we suggest cilostazol (Grade 2A). We suggest that clinicians not use cilostazol in patients with less-disabling claudication (Grade 2A). In these patients, we recommend against the use of pentoxifylline (Grade 1B). We suggest clinicians not use prostaglandins (Grade 2B). In patients with intermittent claudication, we recommend against the use of anticoagulants (Grade 1A). In patients with acute arterial emboli or thrombosis, we recommend treatment with immediate systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Grade 1C]. We also recommend systemic anticoagulation with UFH followed by long-term vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with embolism [Grade 1C]). For patients undergoing major vascular reconstructive procedures, we recommend UFH at the time of application of vascular cross-clamps (Grade 1A). In patients undergoing prosthetic infrainguinal bypass, we recommend aspirin (Grade 1A). In patients undergoing infrainguinal femoropopliteal or distal vein bypass, we suggest that clinicians do not routinely use a VKA (Grade 2A). For routine patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass without special risk factors for occlusion, we recommend against VKA plus aspirin (Grade 1A). For those at high risk of bypass occlusion and limb loss, we suggest VKA plus aspirin (Grade 2B). In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, we recommend aspirin preoperatively and continued indefinitely (Grade 1A). In nonoperative patients with asymptomatic or recurrent carotid stenosis, we recommend lifelong aspirin (Grade 1C+). For all patients undergoing extremity balloon angioplasty, we recommend long-term aspirin (Grade 1C+).
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) prescribed as prophylaxis for NSAID-related upper gastrointestinal (UGI) toxicity is dependent upon patient adherence. AIM: To describe patient adherence to prophylactically prescribed PPIs and H2RAs in the clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using the Integrated Primary Care Information Project database. The study population consisted of incident non-specific NSAID users prescribed a PPI or H2RA specifically as prophylaxis for NSAID-related UGI toxicity. Patients were classified as non-adherent if < 75% of days of NSAID use were covered by one of these agents, and as continuing users after discontinuation of NSAID use if they had a renewed prescription for these agents after their last NSAID prescription. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 784 patients: 374 with H2RAs, 405 with PPIs, and 5 with both PPI and H2RA. Eighty-five percent of H2RA users and 7% of PPI users were prescribed these drugs at doses below the minimum recommended/effective dose for NSAID-associated gastroduodenal ulcer prophylaxis. Thirty-seven percent of patients were non-adherent. The lowest rate of non-adherence was associated with the first NSAID prescription (9%), increasing to 61% for patients with >/= 3 prescriptions. In a cohort of subjects who stopped their NSAID and were followed for up to 2 years (n = 711), there was significant persistent use of acid suppressive agents; 40% of patients had at least one additional prescription for the acid suppressive agent after stopping NSAIDs, and> 30% received enough drug to cover a period longer than 2 months after stopping their NSAID. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of PPI and H2RA prescriptions, when prescribed as prophylactic strategy, does not correspond with the pattern of NSAID use. Physicians should consider the medical impact of non-adherence with dual therapies and the impact of prolonged use of GPAs on treatment cost.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Multiple treatment guidelines for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) suggest that patients with one or more risk factors for NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal (UGI) ulcer complications should be prescribed preventive strategies such as acid-suppressive drugs, misoprostol or cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitors to reduce their risk of serious ulcer complications. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the extent to which new NSAID users receive recommended preventive strategies and to assess the association between risk factors and a prescription of acid suppressive drugs or misoprostol. METHOD: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database, a longitudinal database of electronic general practitioner patient records in The Netherlands. The study population comprised all new NSAID users, defined as users of non-specific NSAIDs, COX-2-preferential NSAIDs and COX-2-specific inhibitors, during the period from January 1996 to April 2002. Subjects were excluded if they had an H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA), proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or misoprostol prescription in the 3 months prior to the first NSAID prescription. Preventive use of acid-suppressive drugs or misoprostol was identified by the coprescription for these drugs on the same day (+/-2 days) as the NSAID prescription. The drug use for each patient was validated as having a preventive indication by reviewing the physician-recorded symptoms and diagnoses. Risk factors for UGI ulcer events were defined as age >65 yr, UGI history (gastroduodenal ulcer, UGI bleeding, dyspepsia) and concomitant medications (anticoagulants, aspirin, oral corticosteroids). The study population comprised 69 648 new NSAID users. RESULTS: Overall, 7.9% of NSAID users received a preventive strategy (6.6% received a gastroprotective agent and an additional 1.3% received COX-2-specific inhibitors). Patients using preventive drugs had higher odds of having one or more UGI risk factors than patients without preventive drugs [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.66-1.92]. Despite the greater rate of preventive drug prescriptions in patients who may have been at higher risk, 86.6% of patients with one risk factor and 81.2% with two or more risk factors received no preventive strategies. In contrast to non-specific NSAIDs, patients who received a prescription for a COX-2-specific inhibitor had significantly lower adjusted odds (OR = 0.22) of having H2RA/PPI or misoprostol coprescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients who are treated with preventive strategies have higher odds of having gastrointestinal risk factors than those not prescribed preventive therapies, the majority (>80%) of patients with one or more gastrointestinal risk factors do not receive the recommended NSAID treatment regimen of a COX-2-specific inhibitor or NSAID + H2RA/PPI or misoprostol and are therefore undertreated.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Hyperhomocysteinemia has been identified as a risk factor for (cardio)vascular disease. Whether hyperhomocysteinemia contributes to graft failure after peripheral bypass surgery remains unclear. The present study evaluated the influence of hyperhomocysteinemia on graft patency after infrainguinal bypass surgery. DESIGN: The present study was designed as a nested case-control study. METHOD: In this study (nested in the Dutch Bypass Oral anticoagulants or Aspirin Study), 150 patients with graft occlusion were each matched with two randomly selected controls with patent grafts (N = 299) from the same trial. Venous blood samples were drawn from cases and controls, and total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) was determined. Mean serum homocysteine levels and the presence of hyperhomocysteinemia (>95th percentile in healthy individuals) were compared between cases and controls. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between serum levels of homocysteine in patients with and without graft occlusion. The mean plasma homocysteine levels were 14.4 micromol/L and 14.9 micromol/L in the case and control groups, respectively. The resulting mean difference was -0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.8-0.9). The odds ratio of hyperhomocysteinemia was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.49-1.33). Adjustment for risk factors of graft occlusion did not change these results. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative raised serum levels of homocysteine proved not to be a risk factor for graft occlusion after infrainguinal bypass grafting.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation in patients who participated in a randomized trial of oral anticoagulants or aspirin after infrainguinal bypass graft surgery. METHODS: The distribution of patient-time spent in international normalized ratio (INR) classes of 0.5 INR unit was calculated assuming a linear change between successive measurements. INR-specific incidence rates of ischemic and hemorrhagic events were calculated as the ratio of the number of events at a certain INR category and the total patient-time spent in that class. The relationship between INR class and event rates was quantified by rate ratios calculated in a Poisson regression model. RESULTS: In 1326 patients (mean age, 69 years) 41,928 INR measurements were recorded in 1698 patient-years. Patients spent 50% of the total time within the target range of 3.0 to 4.5 INR. Most of the patient-time (60%) was spent between 2.5 and 3.5 INR. For each increasing class of 0.5 INR, the incidence of ischemic events (n = 154, INR data on event available in 49%) decreased by a factor of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.87-1.08). The incidence of major bleeding (n = 123, INR data on event available in 65%) increased significantly by a factor of 1.27 (95% CI, 1.19-1.34) for each increasing 0.5 INR category. The optimal target range was 3.0 to 4.0 INR, with an incidence of 3.8 events (0.9 ischemic and 2.9 hemorrhagic) per 100 patient-years. CONCLUSIONS: The target range of 3.0 to 4.0 INR is the optimal range of achieved anticoagulation intensity and is safe for the prevention of ischemic events in patients after infrainguinal bypass graft surgery.
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of the costs of oral anticoagulant (AC) treatment may be relevant for resource allocation. Also, the incremental costs may be compared with other treatments for health care policy decisions. In this report, we have assessed actual costs of anticoagulant therapy in anticoagulation clinics (AC-clinic) in three different settings in the Netherlands. METHODS: Costs of anticoagulant drug supply and costs as a result of INR-adjustment procedures were estimated. We compared the total costs of treatment in patients treated after minor cerebral ischaemia in the Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT) and in patients treated because of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in the Dutch Bypass Oral anticoagulants or Aspirin Trial (BOA). RESULTS: Costs of monitoring ranged between Euro 6.44 and Euro 9.87 per visit for monitoring at the AC-clinic and at home, respectively. The annual costs of administering anticoagulant drugs ranged between Euro 83 (phenprocoumon) and 107 (acenocoumarol). Variation in the overall actual annual costs of AC treatment was caused by the number of monitoring visits, the distribution of home and clinic visits and, to a lesser extent, the medication used. Annual costs of AC therapy for patients in SPIRIT was Euro 239 and for patients in BOA Euro 312. Overall costs of anticoagulant therapy were about 3 to 4-fold higher than standard treatment with aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the actual costs of anticoagulant therapy may be substantially higher than that of other antithrombotic therapies, its cost-effectiveness depends highly on efficacy.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Several antithrombotic therapies are available for the treatment of patients with peripheral vascular diseases. It is unknown how quality of life and costs of treatment are influenced by different therapies. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of oral anticoagulants versus aspirin in patients after infrainguinal bypass grafting surgery. METHODS: Clinical outcome events and event-free survival were collected from 2650 patients in 77 centers who participated in the Dutch Bypass Oral anticoagulants or Aspirin trial. Approximately half the patients had critical ischemia; 60% received vein grafts, and 20% had femorocrural bypass grafts. A model that was primarily driven by clinical outcome events was used as a means of determining quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D) and costs for each patient. The main outcome measure was the incremental health care costs in relation to the additional number of quality-adjusted life years and the additional number of event-free years. RESULTS: The mean costs during the 21 months of follow-up were epsilon 6875 per patient in the oral anticoagulants group versus epsilon 7072 in the aspirin group (difference, 197; 95% CI, -746 to 343). The event-free survival was 1.10 years in the group treated with oral anticoagulants versus 1.09 years in the group treated with aspirin (difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.08), whereas the corresponding quality-adjusted life years were 1.06 and 1.05, respectively (difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.06). CONCLUSION: Health care costs, event-free survival, and quality-adjusted life years in patients after infrainguinal bypass surgery were not different in patients treated with aspirin and patients treated with oral anticoagulants. The extra costs of monitoring patients treated with oral anticoagulants were limited and play no role in the decision for treatment.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: to identify risk factors for infrainguinal bypass occlusion and quantify the predictive value of data available before and after surgery. Design: prospective study of 2650 patients who participated in a randomised trial of oral anticoagulants or aspirin after infrainguinal bypass surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: risk factors were determined by univariate Cox regression analysis, and entered in multivariate analyses which distinguished two models: analysis of factors available from history and clinical examination, completed by radiological and surgical data in the second model. To compare the information content of the two models, receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were computed. RESULTS: in all patients female gender, critical ischaemia, femorocrural bypass grafting and non-venous graft material were independent risk factors. In patients with femoropopliteal bypasses female gender, critical ischaemia, poor run-off and non-venous graft material, the latter even in patients with supragenicular bypasses, were independent risk factors. The only significant risk factor in patients with femorocrural bypass grafts was use of a non-venous graft. The information contained in the first model was poor, whereas the second model had a higher predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: the major risk factor, even in above-knee bypasses, is non-venous graft material. The venous bypass graft should be offered to patients whenever possible.
Abstract: PURPOSE: We sought to determine the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulants in maintaining graft patency and preventing ischemic complications in patients after infrainguinal bypass surgery. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of aspirin with or without other antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulants after infrainguinal bypass surgery. Outcome measures studied were graft occlusion, stroke, myocardial infarction, vascular and total mortality, and the composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular mortality. RESULTS: Five trials of antiplatelet therapy versus placebo were included. The relative risk (RR) for occlusion was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.64-0.95). For prevention of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death, and for the composite outcome, no significant effect was measured. Only one trial of oral anticoagulants versus control treatment was included. The RR for occlusion was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.30-0.99), and that for amputation was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.10-0.87). The mortality rate did not differ significantly between the groups. One trial of oral anticoagulant therapy plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in high-risk patients was included. The RR for occlusion was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.15-0. 95). There were no significant differences for prevention of amputation, myocardial infarction, and death between the groups. CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of graft occlusion. Oral anticoagulant therapy appears to be the more effective treatment in high-risk patients. Data on the reduction of the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death are inconclusive. Evidence for the beneficial effects of antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant therapy after infrainguinal bypass surgery is based on a small number of trials only. There is no proof as to which modality is the most effective in the prevention of graft occlusion and ischemic events in patients after infrainguinal bypass surgery, which is reason for a randomized comparison of aspirin with oral anticoagulants.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: to compare the clinical outcome of in situ and reversed bypass grafting. DESIGN: multicentre, prospective, non-randomised study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: five-hundred patients with an in situ graft and 955 patients with a reversed graft were compared regarding graft occlusion, the need for graft revision, and limb salvage. RESULTS: two-year assisted primary patency of femoropopliteal bypass procedures was 82% for in situ and 82% for reversed grafts. The corresponding hazard ratio (HR) for occlusion was 1.27 (95% CI 0. 91-1.77). The 2-year assisted primary patency of femorocrural bypass procedures was 69% for in situ vs. 70% for reversed grafts. The corresponding HR was 1.13 (95% CI 0.73-1.75). Adjustment for relevant baseline variables did not change the results. More reinterventions were needed to maintain integrity and patency of the in situ graft especially in crural bypasses. No differences in limb salvage rates were seen. CONCLUSIONS: reversed and in situ vein grafts have similar patency and limb salvage rates for both femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypass procedures. The in situ graft needs more secondary interventions.
Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare quality of life in patients with and without various ischemic complications after infrainguinal bypass grafting surgery for occlusive vascular disease. METHODS: A sample of patients (n = 746) randomized in the Dutch BOA study (n = 2645), a multicenter trial that compared the effectiveness of oral anticoagulant therapy with aspirin in the prevention of infrainguinal bypass graft occlusions, was entered in this study. On the basis of clinical outcomes of the trial, the patients were grouped as follows: patients with patent grafts (n = 409); patients with nontreated graft occlusions, subdivided into an asymptomatic group (n = 32) and a symptomatic group (n = 65); patients with subsequent revascularizations (n = 194); patients with amputations (n = 36); and patients with failed secondary revascularizations followed by secondary amputation (n = 38). In case an outcome event occurred, the patients were regrouped accordingly. Every half year, the patients completed a Short Form-36 and a EuroQol questionnaire. A multilevel model was used for repeated measure analysis. RESULTS:The mean follow-up time was 21 months. The quality of life in patients with nontreated asymptomatic occlusions was roughly similar to the quality of life in patients with patent grafts. Patients with symptomatic nontreated occlusions had the lowest outcome with regard to pain as compared with the other groups. Furthermore, physical and social functioning was lower for these patients than for patients with patent grafts. Revascularizations, successful or not, negatively affected pain, social functioning, and physical and emotional role. After successful revascularization, some improvement was observed in pain, physical and social functioning, and general and mental health as compared with the group with nontreated symptomatic occlusions. Amputation deteriorated physical functioning strikingly, especially after failed secondary revascularization. These patients also had the lowest scores of all the groups in the dimensions of social functioning, physical and emotional role, and mental health. EuroQol score showed deterioration of quality of life after all events, except for asymptomatic occlusions. The same patterns emerged if we stratified our analysis according to the indication for the initial operation: claudication or limb salvage. Quality of life was constant over time in all the groups in the observed period. CONCLUSION: Quality of life in patients with asymptomatic occluded grafts is similar to quality of life in patients with patent grafts. Revascularization of symptomatic occluded grafts improves quality of life to a certain extent. Amputation, in particular after failed secondary revascularization, seemed to be the lowest possible outcome. The results of the Short Form-36 and EuroQol measurements were in line with the clinical expectations. The association of disease severity with scores on the instruments supports the construct validity of these outcome measures for an objective assessment of quality of life in controlled studies.
