1997-2001: Study of Earth Sciences at the University of Basel and the ETH Zürich (Switzerland) 2001: Master in Earth Sciences and geophysics, University of Basel (Switzerland) 2008: PhD in Earth Sciences/Paleontology, University of Fribourg (Switzerland) 2000-2002: Paleontologist at the Palaeontology A16 2002-: Research paleontologist at the Palaeontology A16. Head of excavations of Mesozoic dinosaur tracksites along the Swiss federal highway A16 (Transjurane); (coordination of) scientific research related to these dinosaur tracksites. 2009-: Editor (Paleontology) for the Swiss Journal of Geosciences (http://www.springer.com/birkhauser/geo+science/journal/15)
Research interests: Palaeontology, vertebrate & invertebrate (neo-) ichnology, palaeoecology, regional geology of the Jura Mountains (palaeontology, lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy), sedimentology of ancient and recent carbonates & carbonate-siliciclastic sedimentary systems (carbonate platforms, palustrine carbonates)
Research methods: Systematic palaeontological excavation, fundamental (in)vertebrate ichnology, ichnotaxonomy, palaeoecology, sedimentology
Abstract: Late Jurassic sauropod trackways from the Jura Mountains (NW Switzerland) and the central High Atlas Mountains (Morocco) are described and compared. Emphasis is put on track preservation and trackway configuration. The trackways are similar with respect to preservation and the pes and manus track outlines, but they show a large range of trackway configuration. Only one of the trackways reveals digit and claw impressions, and thus differences in trackway gauge and the position of pes and manus tracks are the most explicit characters for their distinction. The Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous ichnotaxa <i>Brontopodus</i>, <i>Parabrontopodus</i> and <i>Breviparopus</i> are reviewed and a differential diagnosis is given for the trackways studied. The reference trackway of <i>Breviparopus</i> corresponds to one of the studied trackways of Morocco. <i>Parabrontopodus</i> and <i>Breviparopus</i> are considered to be both valid ichnotaxa, even though we recommend the latter to be formally erected based on better-preserved tracks than those currently exposed. The analysed trackways and ichnotaxa suggest that trackway configuration, notably trackway gauge (width), is not decisively influenced by extrinsic factors such as ontogenetic stage, locomotion speed and substrate properties. However, it cannot be excluded that it is related to other factors such as individual behaviour or even sexual dimorphism.
Abstract: This study concerns the formation, taphonomy, and preservation of human footprints in microbial mats of present-day tidal-flat environments. Due to differences in water content and nature of the microbial mats and the underlying sediment, a wide range of footprint morphologies was produced by the same trackmaker. Most true tracks are subjected to modification due to taphonomic processes, leading to modified true tracks. In addition to formation of biolaminites, microbial mats play a major role in the preservation of footprints on tidal flats. A footprint may be consolidated by desiccation or lithification of the mat, or by ongoing growth of the mat. The latter process may lead to the formation of overtracks. Among consolidated or (partially) lithified footprints found on present-day tidal flats, poorly defined true tracks, modified true tracks, and overtracks were most frequently encountered while unmodified and well-defined true tracks are rather rare. We suggest that modified true tracks and overtracks make up an important percentage of fossil footprints and that they may be as common as undertracks. However, making unambiguous distinctions between poorly defined true tracks, modified true tracks, undertracks, and overtracks in the fossil record will remain a difficult task, which necessitates systematic excavation of footprints combined with careful analysis of the encasing sediment.
Abstract: Since 2002 six dinosaur tracksites have been discovered by the «Palaeontology A16» on the future course of the Transjurane highway in the Ajoie district of the Canton Jura. These tracksites are systematically excavated prior to the construction of the highway. So far, over 4'000 dinosaur footprints
including 280 trackways have been excavated and documented within three different time
intervals of the Kimmeridgian. This indicates the presence of dinosaur populations, which lived on the northern margin of the Jura carbonate platform. The dinosaur assemblages revealed by footprints
are composed of different size classes of both sauropod (quadrupeds, herbivores) and theropod
(bipeds, carnivores) dinosaurs. The tracksites are of major importance for Switzerland's palaeontological heritage. In 2006, the Chevenez - Combe Ronde tracksite has been spanned by an additional bridge specifically built for this purpose. This is the first large palaeontological site in Switzerland, which is protected and made accessible by the construction of a highway. In May 2006 the Canton Jura decided to pursue the political discussion of a valorisation
of the tracksites. A valorisation with a combined promotion of tourism, science and education
might facilitate palaeontological excavations and research in the Canton Jura, once the construction
of the highway will be accomplished.
Abstract: The Faciès Rognacien is a sequence of highly bioturbated and pedogenically modified palustrine carbonates that were deposited under oxic conditions around the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary in the northeastern Pyrenean foreland basin (SW France). The sedimentary structures and early diagenetic features identified (mottling, nodule formation, brecciation, pseudomicrokarst, cracking, charophytes, Microcodium) suggest deposition in a palustrine environment between the subarid and intermediate climate type. Sedimentological and paleoecological analysis enables us to distinguish two facies associations, the lacustrine pond facies and the freshwater marsh facies associations. The majority of the carbonates are attributed to the freshwater marsh facies. The lacustrine pond facies occurs only in isolated paleolows, and is identified on the basis of its paleobiological content (charophytes, ostracodes). This suggests that the palustrine carbonates of the Faciès Rognacien were deposited in a seasonal wetland (carbonate-producing freshwater marsh), rather than in the marginal zone of a large, shallow lake. In this wetland paleoenvironment, all carbonates underwent widespread pedogenesis, and small, ephemeral ponds are of limited distribution, most likely recording deposition in paleolows.
Abstract: In 2002 a new dinosaur tracksite was discovered in calcareous laminites of early Late Kimmeridgian age along the future course of the âTransjuraneâ highway in Courtedoux, Canton Jura, Northern Switzerland. The site has an extraordinary scientific potential, as the laminites, which have been deposited in an intertidal to supratidal environment, contain at least 6 track-bearing levels in a total thickness of about 1 m. The laminites are being systematically excavated by the âSection de paleontologieâ over an area of approximately 1500 m2. So far the main track level has been uncovered over an area of about 650 m2, which reveals 2 trackways of theropods and 17 trackways of sauropods. The sauropod tracks are the smallest known in the Kimmeridgian so far, and the trackways belong to the ichnogenus Parabrontopodus, which has been revealed for the first time in Switzerland. The tracksite belongs to the âMiddle Kimmeridgian megatracksiteâ sensu Meyer (2000), and represents the most important dinosaur tracksite in Switzerland, perhaps with the potential for development into one of the world's largest sauropod tracksites. It will be protected in situ underneath an especially constructed highway-bridge, thus offering opportunities for future research and the development of an interpretative center for education and tourism.
Abstract: Our review of the last interglacial (Marine Isotope Stage 5e) stratigraphic record from the Boiling Hole exposure in northern Eleuthera Island, Bahamas, revealed the occurrence of two vertically stacked shallowing-upward sequences of oolitic coastal deposits showing beach facies at about 3 and 6 m above mean sea level, respectively. These beach strata dip towards the bank interior and the upper one includes a paleosurface on top of an oolitic grainstone bed with a 2m long bird trackway. These fossil beaches correspond to two distinctive sealevel highstands during the last interglacial that could have possibly reached +5 and +8 m above modern datum, respectively, if estimates of regional subsidence are indeed correct. The bird footprints are the first reported occurrence of vertebrate trace fossils from the Bahama Archipelago. The track maker was probably an extant shorebird belonging to the Order Charadriiformes. Track preservation in an oolitic grainstone is remarkable and may be related to an early phase of halite cementation. Finally, the dip of the beach beds indicates that constituent grains were transported onto the island from the bank side by a westerly flux opposite to the modern sediment transport direction in the area.
Abstract: Dinosaur tracks are biogenic, sedimentary structures and not body fossils or biological objects in the common sense. They result from the complex interaction of the kinematics of the trackmaker, its foot anatomy, and the substrate properties, and from taphonomic processes acting prior to the incorporation of the tracks into the sedimentary record. The objective of this work is an interdisciplinary study of a large sample of dinosaur tracks and trackways linking sedimentology with vertebrate ichnology, palaeontology, and palaeoecology.
Excellent conditions are provided by the Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) ChevenezâCombe Ronde tracksite, which is one of several tracksites located on the future course of the Transjurane highway near Porrentruy (Canton Jura, NW Switzerland). Here, eight superimposed dinosaur track-bearing surfaces were systematically excavated level-by-level within a 0,65 m thick laminite interval, unearthing almost 1400 dinosaur tracks. The main track level, located at the base of the interval, is the most diverse ichnoassemblage composed of 14 trackways of tiny (Pes Length < 25 cm) and small (25 cm < PL < 50 cm) sauropods and 43 trackways of minute (PL < 10 cm), small (10 cm < PL < 20 cm), and medium-sized
(20 cm < PL < 30 cm) bipedal, tridactyl dinosaurs.
The main issues are: (1) identification of true tracks, undertracks, and overtracks, and their relationships with substrate properties, their link with the exposure index, and their utility in the reconstruction of the palaeoenvironment; (2) implications of the main track level ichnoassemblage for dinosaur behaviour, the terrestrial palaeoecosystem, and vertebrate ichnofacies; (3) relationships between variability in trackway patterns and configurations with locomotion speed, behaviour, and substrate properties as well as implications for locomotion capabilities; (4) Quantification and relevance of sauropod trackway gauge; and (5) interpretation of manus-dominated and pes-only sauropod trackways.
The approach is first actualistic by studying human footprints and processes acting during their formation and preservation on modern tidal-flats. In these highly structured environments, microbial mats are ubiquitous, strongly facies-specific, and occupy a key position during and after footprint formation. Undertracks readily form in biolaminated sediment, whilst underprints and deep tracks are common in unlaminated, water-saturated sediment. Most consolidated vertebrate tracks are affected by taphonomic processes, including renewed and/or repeated growth of microbial mats leading to the formation of modified true tracks, internal overtracks (track fills), and overtracks.
The sauropod tracks and the encasing laminite interval of the Combe Ronde site are then subject of detailed sedimentological and taphonomical analyses. This discloses the sediment properties at the time of track formation and reveals the processes modifying the tracks during subaerial exposure and integrating them into the sedimentary record. Track morphology, associated track features, and sedimentary features can be linked with the exposure index, identifying the palaeoenvironment as a supratidal flat not located in close proximity to a coastline. These flats were susceptible for track recording only during short periods after wetting due to a rainy period or due to occasional storms. Longer periods of subaerial exposure prior to burial are indicated by the presence of internal overtracks and/or overtracks, and rapid covering up is indicated by the lack of overtracks on top of tracks with large displacement rims. Cross-sections of sauropod tracks provide insight into the consolidation history of the substrate prior to track formation and into the walking dynamics of dinosaurs, confirming that sauropods put their hindfeet in a pronounced plantigrade way on the ground.
The level-by-level superimposition of the studied surfaces enables to identify true tracks, undertracks, and overtracks. The best-defined true tracks (anatomical morphotypes) of the main track level are then used for ichnotaxonomy and trackmaker identification, and the detailed analyses of trackway parameters, including trackway gauge, provide insight into the locomotion capabilities of dinosaurs.
The best-defined minute and small tridactyl tracks can be assigned to the ichnogenus Carmelopodus, extending it from the Middle Jurassic into the Late Jurassic. These tracks were likely left by a small theropod dinosaur similar in size to Compsognathus or Juravenator. The medium-sized tridactyl tracks of morphotype II exhibit some of the typical features of the ichnogenus Therangospodus (attributed to large and robust theropods) but also some of ornithopod ichnotaxa.
The sauropod trackways show a wide range of patterns and configurations but are all medium- to wide-gauge. Therefore, they are assigned tentatively to the ichnogenus Brontopodus attributed to derived âbrachiosauridâ or âtitanosauridâ dinosaurs. The variability of the trackways reflects the general locomotion capabilities of the trackmakers and is an expression of individual walking style and behaviour, which may be related to substrate properties. Trackway patterns (the degree of manus overprinting by the pes) and different trackway configurations including trackway gauge are not only related to locomotion speed, and they provide no evidence of a relationship with ontogeny.
The gauge of sauropod trackways can be quantified with the pes trackway ratio and the here defined [WAP/PL]-ratio (Width of the pes Angulation Pattern / Pes Length). Gauge is possibly related to the substrate and the behaviour of the trackmaker adapting to it, but this does not change the overall medium-gauge to wide-gauge appearance of the trackways. The manus-dominated and pes-only sauropod trackways of the Combe Ronde site are explained by trackmakers exerting more pressure on the manus than the pes, and by overprinting of the manus by the pes, respectively.
The alignment of trackways on the main track level shows no evidence of a nearby shoreline and of interactions between the different groups of dinosaurs. It indicates gregarious behaviour amongst tiny and small sauropods, and suggests that minute and small bipedal dinosaurs were frequent visitors on the supratidal flats.
The ichnoassemblage of the main track level is the first one found in the Jura Mountains displaying abundant minute and small tridactyl tracks. This is also typical for the other Ajoie ichnoassemblages, which further exhibit tracks of tiny to large (up to 1,1 m PL) sauropods, and tracks of medium-sized to large (up to 0,8 m PL) bipedal dinosaurs. Sauropod trackways include narrow-gauge and wide-gauge trackways indicating the presence of âbasalâ and derived sauropods. This suggests that dwarfed insular animals can be excluded as trackmakers of the tiny and small sauropod trackways of the Ajoie ichnoassemblages and the Combe Ronde tracksite and that the Jura carbonate platform was connected with the landmasses of the London-Brabant Massif and the Massif Central during periods of emersion. Dinosaurs used the Jura carbonate platform for the establishment of in situ, predominantly saurischian dinosaur populations, but also as a migration corridor between the massifs.
Because the Ajoie ichnoassemblages are dominated by small tridactyl tracks, they differ from other Jurassic tetrapod ichnofacies in carbonate settings, notably from the Brontopodus ichnofacies. In the case of those ichnoassemblages commonly attributed to the Brontopodus ichnofacies, the lack or rareness of small tridactyl tracks may indicate the absence of small trackmakers in those palaeoenvironments or unsuitable conditions for the formation and preservation of small tracks.
This study highlights the benefits of systematic and interdisciplinary analyses of dinosaur tracks, which disclose variations related to behaviour and to differences in substrate. This allows recognizing anatomical morphotypes and trackway configurations representative of typical trackmaker behaviour. The latter can then also be used in ichnotaxonomical classification. Similar approaches should be in the focus of future work and performed on the other tracksites and ichnoassemblages of the Ajoie. Together with the evidence from other tracksites of the Jura Mountains, this will contribute towards a better understanding of the terrestrial palaeoenvironments and palaeogeography, and of dinosaur palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography on the Jura carbonate platform.
Abstract: In the Canton Jura (NW Switzerland), the Palaeontology A16 since ten years systematically excavates body fossils and dinosaur tracksites prior to the construction of the highway A16. Four Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) intervals, each with several superimposed track-bearing levels, were excavated level-by-level on six tracksites situated on the future course of the highway. This revealed over 40 ichnoassemblages with 8â930 tracks including 222 sauropod trackways and 244 trackways of tridactyl bipedal dinosaurs, mainly attributed to theropods. The tracks were documented with standard ichnological and state-of-the-art 3D imaging technologies (laserscanning, photogrammetry). Sauropod and tridactyl tracks both vary from very small (10 cm pes length for sauropods; 6 cm for tridactyl tracks) to huge (115 cm for sauropods; 75 cm for tridactyl tracks), and different size classes and morphotypes are commonly associated on single ichnoassemblages. Trackways are up to 115 m long exhibiting different patterns and configurations, also along single trackways. These rich dinosaur ichnoassemblages give important insights into the otherwise poorly-known Late Jurassic dinosaur fauna of the Jura carbonate platform. This talk focuses on recent discoveries and results regarding ichnotaxonomy, palaeobiology and palaeoecology, and discusses future research directions. Furthermore outlined are the importance of the tracksites as natural, palaeontological heritage and implications for geoconservation and construction of the highway. So far, one tracksite was protected by the construction of an additional highway bridge. Discussions concerning the future (coveringup or protection by an additional highway bridge) of two other sites (one over 4000m2 in size) are currently under way at federal level.
Abstract: We report here on the discovery of new sauropod and theropod footprints from the middle and upper part of the Hauptdolomit Group (HDG; Mid to Late Norian) from the Upper Austroalpine Ela Nappe in the Natural Park Ela (Canton Graubünden; South-eastern Switzerland). Field studies and aerial surveys in 2009 revealed trampled surfaces in the middle part of the HDG (Late Alaunian to Early Sevatian) at two different locations that display rounded footprints with no signs of digits and can therefore be assigned to advanced sauropods. Close to the summit of Piz Mitgel (3127 m.a.s.l.), the uppermost part of the HDG displays a surface with well-preserved prosauropod pes prints and small- to medium-sized tridactyl footprints of theropod affinity. The summit of the Piz Ela is formed by steeply inclined, east-dipping bedding planes (816 m2) of the higher of part of the HDG with three vertebrate footprint levels. The lowermost surface shows several imprints of small theropods (?Grallator). The intermediate level (main surface) exhibits a long trackway with large tridactyl footprints with a pes length of about 33 cm, which can be assigned to the ichnogenus Eubrontes. Furthermore, a trackway with large footprints of a bipedal animal is present on the same level. The highest level, just below the summit, shows tridactyl tracks of small theropods and faint, large, rounded imprints that were most probably left by prosauropods. Higher up in the stratigraphic sequence at the boundary between the HDG and the overlying Kössen Formation (Sevatian), we found a dolomitic layer that shows a trackway with deep and possibly tridactyl imprints with mud rims of a bipedal animal.
Up to now, seven levels with dinosaur tracks have been detected in a stratigraphic range spanning the Norian (Alaunian) to Late Rhaetian. The large theropod footprints attributed to the ichnotaxon Eubrontes reported here and those from the Swiss National Park together with the record from the coeval Dolomia Principale of the Tre Cime di Lavaredo (? Tuvalian; Dolomites, Italy) are the oldest unequivocal evidence of very large theropod dinosaurs in the Triassic. They predate the fossil remains of Liliensternus liliensterni from the Late Norian Knollenmergel of Southern Germany. If, the presence of footprints of advanced sauropods can further be substantiated these tracksites will become a key-element for the reconstruction of the evolutionary scenarios of saurischian dinosaurs developed in the last few years.
Abstract: Unequivocal signs of emergence occur throughout the Late Jurassic, Kimmeridgian Reuchenette Formation of the Swiss Jura platform. Foremost of these are about 30 dinosaur tracksites that have been described from several localities and at least 5 stratigraphic intervals from NW Switzerland. The footprints indicate in situ populations of herbivorous and carnivorous dinosaurs on the Jura platform. This implies that a vegetational cover and consequently soils must have existed. Nonetheless, to date no palaeosols have been documented from the Late Kimmeridgian succession and no proof of soil formation has been presented.
A Mediterranean climate is presumed to have prevailed on the carbonate platform during the Kimmeridgian. Typically, terra-rossa type soils should form on limestone under such climatic conditions and their formation should lead to karstification and iron-hydroxide impregnation. Two conspicuous, iron-impregnated, flat surfaces, from two intervals have been studied in detail to reconstruct their formation history. Different lines of evidence point to emersion and temporary formation of a soil cover over these beds. Although no root traces have been recorded, aragonite dissolution, formation of micritic meniscus cements, minor karstification and erosion all point to emersion of the surfaces and potential covering with soil. Subsequent re-flooding of the platform led to erosion of the soil cover wave cutting and re-deposition of clays and organic matter in shallow intra-platform lagoons. Such erosive events may partially explain the eutrophication of the system observed up-section of these surfaces. Due to coastal erosion large amounts of nutrients were mobilised and introduced into the platform waters, leading to a partial inhibition of the carbonate factory and the formation of mass accumulations of suspension-feeding molluscs.
Abstract: Sauropod trackways are generally classified according to their trackway width as narrow- and wide-gauge, and these categories are thought to have been left by basal (Diplodocidae) and more derived (Brachiosauridae and titanosauriform) sauropod dinosaurs, respectively. Nonetheless, a quantification of trackway gauge was only recently proposed by Romano et al. (2007) introducing the pes trackway ratio and by Marty (2008) introducing a ratio between the width of the pes angulation pattern and the corresponding pes track length. Narrow-gauge sauropod trackways from Morocco assigned to the ichnogenus Breviparopus DUTUIT & OUAZZOU 1980 do â contra all published outline drawings (e.g., Dutuit & Ouazzou, 1980; Ishigaki, 1989) â not show any evident toe or pollex impressions (Meyer & Monbaron, 2002; Belvedere, 2008). Depending on their preservational state, those from Switzerland may exhibit toe and/or claw impressions, and they are assigned to Parabrontopodus LOCKLEY, FARLOW & MEYER 1994 (e.g., Marty et al., 2003). Here, we compare Late Jurassic narrow-gauge trackways of different size classes from continental siliciclastic deposits of the central High Atlas and from carbonate-platform tidal-flat deposits of the Jura Mountains with respect to track preservation, track morphology, and trackway configuration (notably gauge). In doing so, we will highlight the influence of substrate properties, trackmaker behaviour (e.g., locomotion speed), and ontogenetic stage of the trackmakers on track morphology and trackway configuration. Finally, we will discuss the validity of the two ichnogenera, and â because Breviparopus may be restricted to the Gondwanan realm â their use in palaeo(bio)geographical reconstructions around the Tethys during the Middle to Late Jurassic.
Abstract: A new hypothesis is proposed that attempts to explain the genesis of several key phenomena such as: mass accumulations of nerineoids and oysters, hardgrounds and marls as well as signs of emersion, that are so characteristic for the Kimmeridgian succession of the Swiss Jura Mountains. Based on circumstantial evidence from two different maximum flooding surfaces, masked evidence of emersion and soil formation has been identified. During times of regression large parts of the Late Jurassic European carbonate platform emerged. Evidence for these recurrent periods of emergence in the form of dinosaur trackbearing intervals, tidal laminites, birdseyes, and beach lamination is abundant throughout the Kimmeridgian succession. The fresh water associated with these newly emerged areas initially dissolved the aragonitic components in the carbonate sediments and precipitated cements, thus leading to an early diagenetic consolidation. Following a new line of evidence for the genesis of terra rossa recently put forward by Merino and Banerjee (2008) and Meert et al. (in press), possible candidates for sub-soil rock surfaces are identified. Terra rossa is the typical soil-cover on carbonate rocks in Mediterranean type climate zones such as have been proposed for the Late Kimmeridgian (Abbink et al., 2001). Terra rossa soils have been shown to form principally by replacement of carbonate by authigenic clay minerals at a reaction front at the soil-rock interface. This process leads to corrosion and karstification of the underlying limestone. Due to the buffering effect of the carbonate, iron oxides and hydroxides are preserved, which encrust and impregnate the reaction front. By these means soils can accumulate with a speed of 25 cm / 10â000 years. These soils potentially permit a vegetation cover to become established on the emerged part of the platform, which in turn can sustain diverse populations of dinosaurs. Fossilized remains of this ancient flora, especially large pieces of wood, have lately been recovered from the lower Virgula marls near Porrentruy (Canton of Jura). Surfaces showing iron hydroxide impregnation, microkarst formation, dissolution of aragonitic components, corrosion, and negative excursions of the δ13C and δ18O isotope values due to the exposure to soil gas and fresh-water influence, respectively, are proposed to resemble the metasomatic front of the bedrock underlying these ancient terra rossa covers. These sequence-boundary deposits, however, are masked during the subsequent transgression. Rising sea level erodes the soil cover and vegetation, leaving only the ironhydroxide impregnated and microkarstified bedrock in evidence. The previously consolidated rocks are consequently intensely bored and encrusted. The organic-rich soil is flushed into the shallow waters of the platform where it forms the food basis for the suspension-feeding nerineoids in the high-energy zone. The clays are washed past the high-energy zone and finally are deposited in the deeper parts of the platform where they form the food basis for the small oysters Nanogyra (BEURLEN, 1958), which are abundant in the conspicuous, dark, organic-rich Virgula marls.
Abstract: Sauropod trackways from the Late Jurassic of NW Switzerland vary between narrow-gauge and very wide-gauge when the pes trackway ratio of Romano et al. (2007) and the ratio introduced by Marty (2008) between the width of the pes angulation pattern and the corresponding pes length (i.e., [WAP/PL]-ratio) are applied. So far, studied trackways include several narrow-gauge and one very wide-gauge trackways from a single tracklevel and medium-gauge to very wide-gauge trackways from another slightly older tracklevel. Marty et al. (2003) assigned the narrow-gauge type to the ichnogenus Parabrontopodus based on typical trackway characteristics (i.e., pronounced narrow-gauge, strong heteropody, outwardly rotated manus), later on Marty (2008) tentatively assigned the medium-gauge to very wide-gauge trackways to the ichnogenus Brontopodus because of their clearly wider gauge. However, the pes and manus tracks of all studied trackways, even though most of them are not very well preserved, have a very similar morphology: pes tracks longer than wide, oval in shape, and occasionally exhibiting digit impressions; manus tracks (if undeformed by the subsequent pes) wider than long, semicircular or slightly horseshoe-shaped, and without evidence for a claw impression on digit I. Apart from the marked difference in gauge, they further exhibit a similar general trackway configuration: strong heteropody, pes and manus rotated outwards, manus showing a higher outward rotation than pes, and centres of manus tracks being placed farther away from the trackway midline than those of the pes tracks.
Therefore, the assignation of the studied trackways to the two distinct sauropod trackway types narrow-gauge (e.g., Parabrontopodus, Breviparopus) and wide-gauge (e.g., Brontopodus), based on differences in gauge alone, is problematic. We assume that the gauge of the studied trackways is not only related to the variable posture of different taxa (basal and more derived sauropods), but it may also have been influenced by other parameters such as substrate consistency, behaviour, speed or ontogenic stage. We plan to analyze all (currently 177) sauropod trackways including well-preserved tracks with anatomical details (i.e., digit and claw impressions) of NW Switzerland in a consistent way, to make preservational and sedimentological analyses, and to compare them with other known sauropod ichnotaxa, in order to clarify their ichnotaxonomical assignation.
Abstract: Since 2002, the Palaeontology A16 has excavated dinosaur tracksites near Porrentruy along the future course of the Transjurane highway A16. This resulted in the development of a complex excavation-, documentation-, and protection-methodology of dinosaur tracksites.
First, tracksites are located by geological surveying followed by palaeontological prospecting with shovel excavators. Large-scale excavations are then planned and scheduled in agreement with the civil engineering office prior to the construction of the highway. The tracks are found on multiple superimposed palaeosurfaces within horizontally-bedded laminites of Late Kimmeridgian age, which accordingly have to be excavated level-by-level. At the beginning of an excavation, as much overburden as possible is removed with the aid of shovel excavators. Within the laminites, the track-bearing levels are then excavated and cleaned with hand tools, a time-consuming and difficult affair.
Tracks are then searched for, identified, and whenever possible attributed to trackways. This includes analyses at night with oblique lighting, indispensable to find and study small tracks and track details. Simultaneously, all tracks are outlined with black chalk and labelled on the surface itself using specified acronyms. Subsequently, tracks and trackways are analyzed and described, and their parameters measured in a consistent fashion and gathered in a database. They are also photographed including stereoscopic photographs of selected tracks. Further, macrosedimentary features (e.g., desiccation cracks, ripple marks) are analyzed and the encasing sediment is logged and sampled.
Afterwards, a geo-referenced 2x2 meter grid is installed on the surface and tracks and normal faults are drawn at a scale of 1:10 or 1:20. These drawings are vectorized in the office and assembled in a map. As outline drawings represent one personâs simplified interpretation of a complex three-dimensional object, the most important palaeosurfaces are likewise documented with 3D imaging techniques using high-resolution laser scanning and extreme close-range (2-10 m from camera to object) photogrammetry. These are merged in a virtual 3D model, on the basis of which tracks and trackways can easily be vectorized and their parameters measured in CAD software, if previously they were labelled and outlined with chalk. Similarly assembled data can later also be integrated into a GIS database.
If a surface is going to be destroyed or exposed to weathering after excavation the 3D documentation is the most accurate way to document its original state, especially if applied together with complementary, classical illustrative and descriptive techniques as well as replicas. Consequently, future generations of researchers will have access to virtually the same database. Nonetheless, judging by our own experience, the 3D methods cannot fully replace careful observations and descriptions of the actual tracks in the field because the interpretation of small tracks or track details (e.g., digital pads, claws, skin impressions), poorly-preserved tracks, and/or crossing trackways (track interferences) is a difficult and subjective task done at best on the original specimens. Also, 3D methods are expensive and cannot always be applied. Another drawback is that adequate safeguarding of the imaging data for posterity may be difficult to guarantee.
After their documentation, the most important tracks and trackways are either recovered as slabs or replicated, and then the underlying level is excavated. Such level-by-level excavation and documentation offer important insight into the formation, taphonomy, and preservation of tracks, notably the identification of undertracks, true tracks, and overtracks.
At the end of an excavation recovered slabs, samples, and replicas are archived, and the documentation (e.g., photographs, track parameters, etc.) is assembled in a database (collection and documentation management). The main track level of the Transjurane tracksites is commonly located at the top of massive limestone and at the base of laminites. Consequently, it cannot be removed and will be either covered or (partially) destroyed by the construction of the highway. The importance of a tracksite has to be evaluated âin contextâ based on abundance, quality, and uniqueness of the tracks. Whenever possible it has to be preserved as a geotope in situ. Actually, one tracksite is already preserved for posterity by the construction of an additional highway bridge.
Abstract: This study is based on dinosaur tracks from the Swiss Jura Mountains, excavated on multiple superimposed palaeosurfaces located within Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) biolaminite intervals. The approach is first actualistic by studying processes acting during the formation and taphonomy of human footprints on tidal-flats, notably the stabilizing role of microbial mats. When compared with these recent prints, dinosaur tracks and the encasing sediment provide insight into walking dynamics, properties of the substrate, processes modifying and preserving tracks, consolidation history, and they identify true tracks, undertracks, and overtracks. These observations can be linked with the exposure index and suggest that the palaeoenvironment was a supratidal flat. Trackway configuration (e.g. gauge) and patterns (degree of manus overprinting) are quantified and analyzed. Their variability is an expression of locomotion capabilities related to walking style and speed, behavior, and substrate properties. Manus-only and pes-only sauropod trackways are explained by animals exerting more pressure on manus than pes, and to overprinting of manus by pes. Sauropod trackways with similar track morphology vary from medium- to wide-gauge (not clearly related to speed and ontogeny) challenging the traditional classification of sauropod trackways. Nonetheless, wide-gauge trackways are tentatively assigned to Brontopodus and narrow-ones to Parabrontopodus. Small (i.e. < 0.2 m long) tridactyl tracks are assigned to Carmelopodus (extending this ichnogenus into the Late Jurassic), and larger (i.e. > 0.2 m long) ones to Therangospodus. Trackway orientation and alignment indicates gregarious behavior amongst sauropods, and the common presence of small bipedal dinosaurs on supratidal flats. Small tridactyl and small (i.e. < 0.3 m) sauropod tracks are abundant, but large tridactyl (up to 0.8 m) and sauropod (up to 1.2 m) tracks are also common. Size-frequency distributions suggest the establishment of in situ, saurischian-dominated populations on the Jura carbonate platform, which consequently was regularly connected with the neighboring massifs and could also serve as a migration corridor.
Abstract: Recently, an increasing number of investigations comparing fossil and modern microorganisms highlighted the role of microbial mats in the formation of minerals and diagenetic processes leading to the development of sedimentary rocks including lithographic limestones and trace fossils. More specifically, on recent tidal flats, the sporadic growth of microbial mats alternating with carbonate precipitation may lead to the formation of biolaminated sediments, where vertebrate tracks (true tracks, undertracks, overtracks) are easily preserved (Marty et al. 2009). However, because microbial mats are mainly composed of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) containing over 70% of water, the former presence of microbial mats in the fossil record can only with electron microscopy be proven unambiguously (Pacton et al. 2007).
This study is based on Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) dinosaur track-bearing laminites from NW Switzerland near Porrentruy, which formed on tidal flats of the Jura carbonate platform (Marty 2008). Macrosedimentary structures (i.e., dinosaur tracks, desiccation cracks, ripple & wrinkle marks) of superimposed palaeosurfaces were documented and analysed and a high-resolution microfacies analysis was carried out. Of selected samples the total organic carbon content was determined by Rock-Eval pyrolysis, and mineralogical (including clay minerals) analyses were performed by standard X-ray diffraction. The organic matter (OM) was then isolated from the mineral fraction using a standard palynological preparation technique in order to analyse it on thin sections with optical microscopy using natural light and blue-light fluorescence, and on ultrathin sections with transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
The former presence of microbial mats is suggested by the stromatolithic appearance of the laminites in the field; cryptmicrobial lamination and fenestrae in thin sections (i.e., a laminated alternation of OM and minerals); polygonal desiccation cracks, pustular nodules, and wrinkle marks on palaeosurfaces; and by associated track features such as (internal) overtracks.
TEM observations show heterogeneous OM mainly composed of a more or less fluffy alveolar network corresponding to exopolymeric substances (EPS), sometimes of âcurlyâ and ovoid bodies with thick membranes corresponding to bacterial and algal cell walls, and accessorily of complex fibrous structures with a strong contrast and characteristic lamellae indicating terrestrial fragments (plants). Further, ultralaminae displaying diffuse outlines and a relatively small thickness (80 nm) have also been observed. According to the classification of Pacton et al. (2008) they can be attributed to bacterial cell walls indicating a low degradation level in the OM cycle. This evidence suggests that the laminites were mainly formed by the sporadic growth of photosynthetic microbial mats occasionally incorporating terrestrial plants.
We conclude that the studied laminite intervals formed in a tidal flat environment subjected to desiccation and rehydration (due to a regularly or episodically covering with shallow water) allowing the growth of microbial mats and hence the formation and preservation of dinosaur tracks. Today, such conditions are typically observed on higher intertidal to supratidal flats. Consequently, the palaeoenvironment of the laminites from NW Switzerland was clearly more terrestrial (i.e., characterized by a higher exposure index) when compared with the Kimmeridgian to Tithonian (sub)lithographic limestones from Cerin (shallow lagoon to intertidal; Gaillard et al. 1994), Orbagnoux (shallow lagoon; Tribovillard et al. 1999), and Solnhofen (deeper lagoon; Seilacher 2008).
Abstract: Since 2002, the Palaeontology A16 excavates dinosaur tracksites near Porrentruy along the future course of the Transjurane highway A16 (Marty et al., 2007). This resulted in the development of a complex excavation-, documentation-, and protection-methodology of dinosaur tracks and tracksites.
First, tracksites are located by geological surveying followed by palaeontological prospecting with shovel excavators. Large-scale excavations are then planned and scheduled in agreement with the civil engineering office over one to several years prior to the construction of the highway. The tracks are found on multiple superimposed palaeosurfaces within horizontally-bedded biolaminites of Late Kimmeridgian age, which accordingly have to be excavated level-by-level. At the beginning of an excavation as much overburden as possible is removed with the help of shovel excavators. Within the biolaminites, the track-bearing levels are then excavated and cleaned with hand tools. This is often a time-consuming and difficult affair, because of normal faults displacing levels or because levels are amalgamated and cannot be followed laterally.
Tracks are then searched for, identified, and wherever possible attributed to trackways. This includes analyses at night with oblique lighting, indispensable to find and study small tracks and track details. Simultaneously, all tracks are outlined with black chalk and labelled on the surface itself using specified acronyms. Subsequently, the tracks and trackways are analyzed and described, and their parameters are measured in a consistent fashion and gathered in a database. They are also photographed including stereoscopic photographs of selected tracks. Further, macrosedimentary features (e.g., desiccation cracks, ripple marks) are analyzed and the encasing sediment is logged and sampled.
Afterwards, a georeferenced 2x2 meter grid is installed on the surface and tracks and normal faults are drawn at a scale of 1:10 or 1:20. These drawings are vectorized in the office and assembled in a map. Because outline drawings represent one personâs simplified interpretation of a complex three-dimensional object, the most important palaeosurfaces are likewise documented with 3D imaging techniques using high-resolution (in the order of 1-2 mm) laser scanning and extreme close-range (2-10 m from camera to object) photogrammetry. These are merged in a virtual 3D model, on the basis of which tracks and trackways can easily be vectorized and their parameters measured in CAD software, if previously they were labelled and outlined with chalk. Similarly assembled data can later also be integrated into a GIS database.
If a surface is going to be destroyed or exposed to weathering after excavation the 3D documentation is the most accurate way to document its original state, especially if applied together with complementary, classical illustrative and descriptive techniques as well as replicas (see also Lockley & Matthews, 2007). Consequently, future generations of researchers will have access to virtually the same database. Nonetheless, judging by our own experience, the 3D methods cannot fully replace careful observations and descriptions of the actual tracks in the field because the interpretation of small tracks or track details (e.g., digital pads, claws, skin impressions), poorly-preserved tracks, and/or crossing trackways (track interferences) is a difficult and subjective task made at best on the original specimens. Also, 3D methods are expensive and cannot always be applied. Another drawback is that adequate safeguarding of the imaging data for posterity may be difficult to guarantee.
After their documentation, the most important tracks and trackways are either recovered as slabs or replicated, and then the underlying level is excavated. Such level-by-level excavation and documentation offer important insight into the formation, taphonomy, and preservation of tracks. Notably the identification of undertracks, true tracks, and overtracks, which is important for the correct ichnological and palaeoecological interpretation of the tracks (Marty, 2008).
At the end of an excavation recovered slabs, samples, and replicas are archived, and the documentation (e.g., photographs, track parameters, etc.) is assembled in a database (collection and documentation management). The main track level of the Transjurane tracksites is commonly located at the top of massive limestone and at the base of biolaminites. Consequently, it cannot be removed and will be either covered or (partially) destroyed by the construction of the highway. The importance of a tracksite has to be evaluated âin contextâ based on abundance, quality, and uniqueness of the tracks. Whenever possible it has to be preserved as a geotope in situ. Actually, at least two tracksites can be preserved for posterity by the construction of additional highway bridges. These outstanding results of cooperation between engineers and palaeontologists are the basic conditions for a public accessibility of the tracksites, managed and financed by the Canton Jura, once the highway will be finished.
Abstract: The exposure index links typical sedimentary and organic features to the hydroperiod (i.e., days per year on which the ground surface is covered with water) and is useful in the classification of tidal-flat subenvironments (Ginsburg et al., 1977). Observations made on human footprints in recent tidal-flat environments demonstrate that microbial mats, which are ubiquitous on modern tidal flats and strongly facies-specific (e.g., Noffke et al., 2001), play a crucial role during and after the formation of footprints. Undertracks readily form in biolaminated sediment, and footprints are subjected to a number of taphonomic and sedimentary processes, in which renewed and/or repeated growth of microbial mats is commonly involved (Marty et al., 2008). Sediment consistency and growth parameters of the microbial mats are directly linked to the exposure index and control the consolidation of unmodified true tracks, the formation of modified true tracks and (internal) overtracks, or the burial of true tracks without the formation of overtracks. Similar processes are inferred from detailed sedimentological, taphonomical, and ichnological analyses of Late Jurassic sauropod tracks and associated structures, which were excavated on eight superimposed levels within a 0.65 m thick Late Jurassic biolaminite interval. This allows reconstructing the evolution of the tidal-flat palaeoenvironment throughout the biolaminite sequence. Time control is given by cyclostratigraphy: the sequence accumulated during a sea-level cycle in tune with an orbital precession cycle of 20 kyr. It can thus be determined where in the tidal-flat environment and when in the sea-level cycle the sauropods preferentially left their tracks, and under which circumstances these were incorporated into the sedimentary record. To conclude, detailed sedimentological and taphonomical analyses of vertebrate tracks improve palaeoenvironmental reconstructions, and this in turn facilitates the pertinent interpretation of the tracks in terms of ichnotaxonomy and palaeoecology.
Abstract: Generally, tidal-flats are ill-suited for the conservation of skeletal remains of terrestrial vertebrates, but they are important for the preservation of their footprints. Dinosaur footprints for example, are abundant in tidal-flat deposits throughout the Mesozoic. They fill gaps in the skeletal record and improve the knowledge of dinosaur locomotion and palaeoecology (e.g., Lockley 1998).
The use of fossil footprints for ichnotaxonomy, for interpreting the palaeoecology of the trackmaker, or for reconstructing the palaeoenvironment is closely related to the understanding of footprint formation, taphonomy, and preservation processes. For this purpose, human footprints have been studied in a wide range of present-day tidal-flat environments, where microbial mats are ubiquitous (review in Gerdes & Krumbein 1994), and may lead to the formation of biolaminites (Gerdes et al. 1991). Microbial mats play an important role during the formation and preservation of vertebrate footprints (Marty et al. submitted). Due to different constellations in water content and nature of the microbial mat and underlying sediment, a wide range of true track morphologies was produced by the same human trackmaker. After formation, true tracks are in most cases subjected to modification due to physicochemical and biological taphonomic processes leading to modified true tracks. A (modified) true track may be consolidated by desiccation, lithification, or ongoing growth of the mat. The latter process may lead to the formation of overtracks. Amongst consolidated or (partially-) lithified footprints found on present-day tidal flats, poorly-defined true tracks, modified true tracks, and overtracks were most frequently encountered whilst unmodified and well-defined true tracks were rather rare (Marty et al., submitted).
These observations made on human footprints of recent tidal-flat environments are compared with dinosaur footprints from Late Jurassic biolaminites, excavated on the Transjurane highway (Canton Jura, NW Switzerland; review of the tracksites in Marty et al. 2007), using surface documentations, cross-sectioned footprints, and sedimentological analyses of the encasing sediment. This comparison facilitates evaluating the relative abundance of true tracks, modified true tracks, undertracks, and overtracks, even if an unambiguous identification is not always possible. It is suggested that modified true tracks and overtracks make up an important part of fossil footprints and that they may be as common as undertracks. Even though only unmodified, well-defined true tracks should be used for ichnotaxonomy, poorly-defined true tracks, modified true tracks, and under- and overtracks are important for the reconstruction of the palaeoenvironment and of the physicochemical and biological sedimentary processes acting within.
Abstract: Microbial mats are benthic microbial communities, which are usually dominated by photosysnthetic prokaryotes, particularly cyanobacteria and photosynthetic bacteria (e.g., Bauld, 1984). They are ubiquitous on carbonate as well as on siliciclastic tidal flats (review in Gerdes & Krumbein, 1994). They may lithify by the precipitation of calcium carbonate (e.g., Chafetz & Buczynski, 1992), and consequently enhance the preservation potential of footprints and other traces. The products of benthic microbial communities are called âbiolaminitesâ (the flat laminated type of stromatolites, Gerdes et al., 1991), and they frequently bear vertebrate footprints in the Recent as well as in the geologic record.
Human footprints on microbial mats were studied and documented quantitatively in a wide range of present-day tidal flat environments of the Bahamas, Belize, Egypt, and Tunisia. These environments mainly differ from each other regarding sediment composition and texture, water content related to tidal range and climate, and the biological nature of the microbial mats.
We address a number of issues concerning the formation and potential preservation of human footprints in present-day microbial mat covered tidal flat environments: (1) Relationships between the physical properties of the microbial mat (e.g., moisture content, mat thickness, elastic limit) and the environment and footprint morphology; (2) Consolidation and/or modification of the footprint morphology by continued growth of the microbial mat; (3) Footprint preservation and incorporation into the sedimentary record.
These analyses in the Recent are relevant to better understand the formation and preservation of vertebrate footprints in fossil biolaminites, for the true track vs. undertrack discussion and consequently ichnotaxonomy, and for the interpretation of tidal-flat palaeoenvironments.
Abstract: Since 2002 dinosaur tracks are systematically excavated in Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) carbonate platform sediments (Canton Jura, Switzerland). This platform formed part of the Northern Tethys passive margin in Late Jurassic times. To date, over 55 essentially narrow-gauge trackways of sauropods, and over 90 trackways of bipedal, tridactyl dinosaurs chiefly attributed to theropods, have been excavated and documented on multiple (>15) track-bearing surfaces. This provides insight into track formation and taphonomy, in particular the distinction of true tracks from under- and overtracks, a key point for consistent ichnotaxonomy and paleoecological interpretations. Multiple ichnocoenoses (associations of true tracks on a single surface) include (1) trackways of tiny (FL (footprint length)<25 cm) and large (FL>100 cm) sauropods with trackways of small (10<FL<25 cm) theropods; (2) trackways of tiny and medium-sized (25<FL<40 cm) sauropods with trackways of minute (FL<10 cm), small and medium-sized (25<FL<30 cm) theropods; (3) trackways of tiny and medium-sized sauropods with trackways of medium-sized and large (FL up to 50 cm) theropods. These ichnocoenoses exhibit diverse trackway orientation patterns and trackways with changes in gauge and gait of both sauropods and theropods. Even if these ichnocoenoses only partially reflect the former terrestrial vertebrate ecosystem of the platform, they indicate a recurrent presence of diverse dinosaur communities, at least during periods with prolonged inter- to supratidal conditions. The repeated associations of trackways of similar patterns and track morphology of very small and medium or large sauropods give a hint for different age classes within a single species. Moreover, this suggests thatâcontrary to recent publicationsâstance and resulting trackway gauge of sauropods is not necessarily related to ontogeny. This might be corroborated by more ichnocoenoses obtained by ongoing excavations. Finally, the paleogeographic situation implies that the platform was frequently connected to continental landmasses. This probably prevented a development of insular, dwarfed faunas, as has been postulated for similar carbonate platform settings.
Abstract: Since 2002 dinosaur tracks are systematically excavated in Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) carbonate platform sediments (Canton Jura, Switzerland). This platform formed part of the Northern Tethys passive margin in Late Jurassic times. To date, over 55 essentially narrow-gauge trackways of sauropods, and over 90 trackways of bipedal, tridactyl dinosaurs chiefly attributed to theropods, have been excavated and documented on multiple (>15) track-bearing surfaces. This provides insight into track formation and taphonomy, in particular the distinction of true tracks from under- and overtracks, a key point for consistent ichnotaxonomy and paleoecological interpretations. Multiple ichnocoenoses (associations of true tracks on a single surface) include (1) trackways of tiny (FL (footprint length)<25 cm) and large (FL>100 cm) sauropods with trackways of small (10<FL<25 cm) theropods; (2) trackways of tiny and medium-sized (25<FL<40 cm) sauropods with trackways of minute (FL<10 cm), small and medium-sized (25<FL<30 cm) theropods; (3) trackways of tiny and medium-sized sauropods with trackways of medium-sized and large (FL up to 50 cm) theropods. These ichnocoenoses exhibit diverse trackway orientation patterns and trackways with changes in gauge and gait of both sauropods and theropods. Even if these ichnocoenoses only partially reflect the former terrestrial vertebrate ecosystem of the platform, they indicate a recurrent presence of diverse dinosaur communities, at least during periods with prolonged inter- to supratidal conditions. The repeated associations of trackways of similar patterns and track morphology of very small and medium or large sauropods give a hint for different age classes within a single species. Moreover, this suggests thatâcontrary to recent publicationsâstance and resulting trackway gauge of sauropods is not necessarily related to ontogeny. This might be corroborated by more ichnocoenoses obtained by ongoing excavations. Finally, the paleogeographic situation implies that the platform was frequently connected to continental landmasses. This probably prevented a development of insular, dwarfed faunas, as has been postulated for similar carbonate platform settings.
Abstract: In 2003, the âPalaeontology A16â discovered first dinosaur tracks at ChevenezâCombe Ronde near Porrentruy in the Swiss Jura. The tracks are located in intertidal calcareous laminites, deposited on a shallow carbonate platform during the early Late Kimmeridgian (Marty et al., 2003).
Tracks have been excavated in three areas (total of about 570 m2). They occur on the main track level as well as on six bedding planes within the overlying laminites. The main track level yields one of the richest Jurassic ichnocoenosis with over 50 trackways of small sauropods and particularly small theropods. The laminites display tracks and trackways of sauropods, which show a wide range of preservation state. The systematic track excavation offered the possibility to uncover track-bearing horizons layer by layer, and thus to document and study hundreds of dinosaur tracks unaffected by differential weathering (Fig. 1). Several sauropod tracks have been extracted in blocks as heavy as one ton. The blocks were then consolidated with epoxy and cut with an industrial stone saw. The cross sections will facilitate the study of sedimentology and taphonomy of the dinosaur tracks. This will permit to establish criteria to distinguish true tracks from over- and undertracks.
Abstract: Since 2002 the âPalaeontology A16â systematically excavates dinosaur tracks in early Late Kimmeridgian platy limestones (Plattenkalke) along the âTransjuraneâ highway.
The tabular and thinly-bedded platy limestones have a stromatolitic appearance in the field, however it is difficult to recognize in polished sections or thin sections. Bedding planes yield a diverse tetrapod ichnocoenose exhibiting different size-classes of both sauropod and theropod dinosaur tracks. They also display desiccation cracks and wave- and current ripples. The layer-by-layer excavation clearly identifies overtracks, true tracks (elite tracks) and undertracks, whereas dinoturbated layers generally consist of true tracks as well as over- and undertracks stemming from adjacent levels.
Several sauropod tracks have been artificially consolidated and cut into serial sections. Together with the sedimentological and ichnological data gained from bedding planes, the cross sections allow conclusions about the genesis and the taphonomical history of a given dinosaur track and the substrate consistency at the time of the track formation respectively.
Sedimentological and ichnological analysis of the platy limestones combined with track taphonomy and palaeoecological information allow a subdivision into several different units. These units correspond to different palaeoenvironments ranging from shallow lagoon to beach and to supratidal flat (algal marsh). In similar recent environments of the Bahamas and the Sabkha El Melah (Tunisia), a wide range of track morphologies has been observed, which stems basically from differences in water content of the sediment, the presence of microbial-algal mats that bind and stabilize the sediment, and early-diagenetic carbonate cementation, even if exceptional behaviour of the trackmaker is present or weathering affects the track morphology. To conclude, the understanding of track taphonomy helps to characterize the palaeoenvironment and is indispensable for ichnotaxonomical classification.
Abstract: The palustrine Facies Rognacien can be found in the northern French Pyrenean foreland (Southern France). So far it has not been known, in what environment exactly it was deposited, and whether the K/T-boundary lies within the Facies Rognacien or the overlying Facies Vitrolien, which is almost entirely built up of rock-forming Microcodium.
The study of the Charophytes facilitated to locate the K/T-boundary in the lower part of the upper limestone sequence of the Facies Rognacien.
The sedimentological (microfacies analysis) and paleoecological studies revealed, that inside the study area most carbonates of the Facies Rognacien can be attributed to the freshwater marsh facies sensu Platt and Wright (1992), which was formed in ancient seasonal wetlands. In this environment small lakes or ponds, the marginal lake facies sensu Freytet & Plaziat (1982) respectively, account only for a small part of the depositional area. The Facies Rognacien is thus a good example for an ancient wetland, even if Peybèrnes & Combes (1999) state, that the sediments of the Facies Rognacien become increasingly lacustrine in the north of the study area.