Abstract: Oxaliplatin has emerged as a major chemotherapeutic drug in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, yet like most conventional cancer therapeutics, its efficacy is often compromised due to p53 mutations. Unlike oxaliplatin, tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) triggers apoptosis in a p53-independent manner, and chemotherapy is known to overcome tumour resistance to TRAIL-induced cell death in most cancer cells. Using a panel of colon cancer cell lines, we assessed the ability of oxaliplatin to sensitize to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. We demonstrate that while both drugs additively or synergistically induced apoptosis in almost all cell lines tested, p53 wild-type colon cancer cells such as HCT116, LS513 or LS174T remained resistant. Impaired TRAIL-induced cell death resulted from a strong p53 dependent, oxaliplatin-mediated, DcR1 receptor expression increase. According to our finding, downregulation of DcR1 using siRNA, in p53 wild-type colon cancer cells, restored oxaliplatin/TRAIL synergistic apoptotic activity. On the contrary, exogenous DcR1 overexpression in SW480, a p53-mutated cell line, abolished the synergy between the two drugs. Altogether we demonstrate for the first time that p53 negatively regulates oxaliplatin-mediated TRAIL-induced apoptotic activity through DcR1 upregulation. Our findings could have important implications for future therapeutic strategies, and suggest that the association oxaliplatin/TRAIL should be restricted to patients harbouring a non-functional p53 protein.

Abstract: Since its identification in 1995, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has sparked growing interest in oncology due to its reported ability to selectively trigger cancer cell death. In contrast to other members of the TNF superfamily, TRAIL administration in vivo is safe. The relative absence of toxic side effects of this naturally occurring cytokine, in addition to its antitumoural properties, has led to its preclinical evaluation. However, despite intensive investigations, little is known in regards to the mechanisms underlying TRAIL selectivity or efficiency. An appropriate understanding of its physiological relevance, and of the mechanisms controlling cancer cells escape from TRAIL-induced cell death, will be required to optimally use the cytokine in clinics. The present review focuses on recent advances in the understanding of TRAIL signal transduction and discusses the existing and future challenges of TRAIL-based cancer therapy development.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: High burden of high risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) has been shown to be predictive for the development of high grade cervical lesions and invasive cancers. However, low viral load cannot inevitably exclude progression towards cervical diseases. Moreover, few studies addressed whether viral load could predict infection clearance. OBJECTIVES: We carried out a retrospective study to analyze the variations of HPV16 load over time as a predictive marker of clinical outcome. STUDY DESIGN: The population consisted of 38 women who were found HR HPV positive by HCII test at study entry. Among them, 13 had developed a CIN2/3 (cases) and 25 had a negative HCII test and a normal cytology (controls) at study exit. The HPV16 DNA loads were quantified in 132 longitudinal cervical samples using quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: At study entry, the median of HPV16 load was not statistically different between controls and cases. However, when using a cut-off value of 200 copies/10(3) cells, the rate of cumulative incidence of CIN2/3 at 18 months increased from 14% in women with a load<or=200 copies/10(3) cells to 48% in women with a load>200 copies/10(3) cells. The longitudinal analysis performed on follow-up samples showed that in cases the progression to CIN2/3 was linked to HPV16 burden increasing over time, whereas in controls a decrease of at least 1 log HPV16 DNA load was observed over>or=2 time points. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that kinetics of HPV load, rather than a single HPV detection, might be more reliable to estimate whether a HPV infection will progress or be cleared.

Abstract: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a member of the TNF family that induces cancer cell death by apoptosis with some selectivity. TRAIL-induced apoptosis is mediated by the transmembrane receptors death receptor 4 (DR4) (also known as TRAIL-R1) and DR5 (TRAIL-R2). TRAIL can also bind decoy receptor 1 (DcR1) (TRAIL-R3) and DcR2 (TRAIL-R4) that fail to induce apoptosis since they lack and have a truncated cytoplasmic death domain, respectively. In addition, DcR1 and DcR2 inhibit DR4- and DR5-mediated, TRAIL-induced apoptosis and we demonstrate here that this occurs through distinct mechanisms. While DcR1 prevents the assembly of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) by titrating TRAIL within lipid rafts, DcR2 is corecruited with DR5 within the DISC, where it inhibits initiator caspase activation. In addition, DcR2 prevents DR4 recruitment within the DR5 DISC. The specificity of DcR1- and DcR2-mediated TRAIL inhibition reveals an additional level of complexity for the regulation of TRAIL signaling.