Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Vertebroplasty (PV) and balloon kyphoplasty (KP) are minimally invasive vertebral augmentation procedures involving injection of polymethyl methacrylate cement under radiologic control into a fractured vertebral body. They strengthen the bone and improve the intense pain caused by fracture secondary to osteoporosis, metastasis, or trauma and refractory to conservative therapies such as analgesic use, bed rest, and bracing. Aim of the study is to investigate and compare safety and efficacy of KP and PV on pain and mobility in patients with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis or trauma. METHODS: Twenty-one patients have been enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized controlled study with painful vertebral compression fractures resistant to common therapies. Patients underwent KP or PV. A Visual Analog Scale has been used to measure pain status at different time up to 6 months; the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was chosen to evaluate functional activity before procedure and 6 months later. RESULTS: Mean pain scores decreased significantly from pretreatment to posttreatment with KP and PV as did the ODI scores. No significant differences could be found between both groups for the mean VAS and ODI scores preprocedure and postprocedure. Cement extravasation occurred only during PV. No other adverse events correlated to both techniques have been reported. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that both PV and KP offer therapeutic benefit significantly reducing pain and improving mobility in patients with vertebral fracture without significant differences between groups in term of quality. The leakage of cement has been observed only during PV.
Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the relevance of new local anesthetics in pediatric regional anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies evaluate the pharmacokinetics of new local anesthetics, like ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, and compare their safety and efficacy with the old but widely used bupivacaine. SUMMARY: The goal of anesthetists using regional anesthesia is to use local anesthestics that are as safe and effective as possible, with a rapid onset and a long duration. Even though adequate dose guidelines are available, several toxic effects are reported with the use of bupivacaine in children due to inadvertent intravenous injection, long-term infusion (> 48 h) or administration in newborn babies and infants with reduced metabolism. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are new local anesthetics with a wider safety margin that have similar characteristics: both of them are pure S-(-)-enantiomers whose main pharmacological features are less cardio- and neuro-affinity and -toxicity in comparison with the racemic formulae and R-isomers, and a differential neural blockade with less motor than sensory block. Several clinical studies in children compare ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with bupivacaine.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Previous published data comparing ropivacaine 0.2% with levobupivacaine 0.25% have suggested that ropivacaine might be associated with less early postoperative motor blockade compared with levobupivacaine. The aim of the present study was to further investigate this issue comparing equal concentrations (0.2%) of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in children undergoing minor subumbilical surgery. METHODS: Following induction of a standardized anesthetic, patients (1-7 years) were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive a caudal block with either ropivacaine 0.2% (group R, n=30) or levobupivacaine 0.2% (group L, n=30), total volume 1 ml.kg-1. Motor blockade (modified Bromage scale; primary end-point) and analgesia [Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) score] were assessed at predetermined time points during the first 24-postoperative hours. RESULTS: Motor blockade was only registered during the first postoperative hour with no significant differences between the groups (group R n=5, group L n=8). Postoperative CHIPPS scores were almost identical in both groups with only seven and six patients requiring supplemental analgesia (CHIPPS score>or=4) in the R and L groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A 0.2% concentrations of ropivacaine or levobupivacaine are clinically very similar with regard to postoperative analgesia and unwanted postoperative motor blockade in children undergoing minor subumbilical surgery.
Abstract: In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial, we compared the incidence of unwanted lower extremity motor blockade and the analgesic efficacy between small-dose (0.125%; 0.2 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) postoperative epidural infusions of bupivacaine (Group B; n = 28), levobupivacaine (Group L; n = 27), and ropivacaine (Group R; n = 26) in children after hypospadias repair. Motor blockade and pain were assessed at predetermined time points during 48 h by using a modified Bromage scale and the Children's and Infant's Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS). Postoperative analgesia was almost identical in all three study groups (CHIPPS range, 0-3), with no need for the administration of supplemental analgesia in any patient. However, significantly more patients in Group B (n = 6; P = 0.03) displayed signs of unwanted motor blockade during the observation period compared with Group L (n = 0) and Group R (n = 0). In conclusion, significantly less unwanted motor blockade was associated with postoperative epidural infusions of 0.125% levobupivacaine or ropivacaine in children after hypospadias repair as compared with a similar infusion of bupivacaine. However, no difference with regard to postoperative analgesia could be detected among the three different local anesthetics studied.
Abstract: We investigated three different concentrations of levobupivacaine (0.125%, 0.20%, and 0.25%; n = 20 in each group) for caudal blockade in a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded fashion in children (1-7 yr) undergoing subumbilical surgery. The duration of postoperative analgesia was assessed as the time to first administration of supplemental analgesia (based on a Childrens and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale score of >or=4), and the degree of immediate postoperative motor blockade was determined by use of a 3-point scale. A dose-response relationship was observed both with regard to median duration of postoperative analgesia (0.125%, 60 min; 0.20%, 118 min; 0.25%, 158 min) and the number of patients with evidence of early postoperative motor blockade (0.125%, 0; 0.20%, 4; 0.25%, 8). The 0.125% concentration was associated with significantly less early motor blockade (P = 0.003) but was found to result in a significantly shorter duration of postoperative analgesia (P < 0.05). Based on these results, the use of 0.20% levobupivacaine might represent the best clinical option if a plain levobupivacaine solution is to be used for caudal blockade in children. IMPLICATIONS: The use of 0.125% levobupivacaine for caudal blockade (1 mL/kg) in children (1-7 yr) was associated with less early postoperative motor blockade but a shorter duration of postoperative analgesia compared with 0.20% and 0.25% solutions.
Abstract: The use of regional anesthesia in children represents one of the most effective methods for perioperative analgesia and postoperative pain control. Things have been dramatically changed in the last two decades due to the appearance of new safer drugs and new tools; moreover new techniques were introduced showing their efficacy. In this paper we briefly describe the efficacy of new local anesthetics and adjuvants; we review the use of continuous peripheral blocks and other not very diffused techniques of regional anesthesia.
Abstract: In spite of improvements in anesthesia techniques, the 'big little problem' of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) still exists. PONV can prolong recovery room stay and hospitalization, and is one of the most common causes of hospital readmission after day surgery. While there is little evidence to support prophylactic administration of antiemetics in patients at low risk of PONV, the higher risk population could benefit from the use of adequate antiemetic drugs. A wide variety of pharmacological approaches have been reported to be effective, as well as some nonpharmacological approaches. Antiemetic drugs available to treat or prevent PONV include phenothiazines, antihistamines, anticholinergics, benzamides, butyrophenones and 5-HT(3) antagonists. Since available drugs still present undesired adverse effects and are not completely able to control PONV, clinical investigations are ongoing for more effective and better tolerated agents; indeed, the ideal antiemetic drug might be cost-effective for routine use.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The adjunctive use of clonidine to local anaesthetics has been reported to enhance analgesia both after spinal and peripheral administration. However, no attempt has been made to compare spinal and peripheral application of clonidine in the same surgical context in order to further explore the mechanism for the analgesic action of clonidine when administered together with local anaesthetics. METHODS: Using a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study design, 40 patients, aged 1-7 years, who were undergoing elective surgery for inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy, were randomly allocated to receive either a caudal block (group C: n = 20; ropivacaine 0.2%, 1 ml.kg-1 + clonidine 2 micro g.kg-1) or an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block (group I: n = 20; ropivacaine 0.2%, 0.4 ml.kg-1 + clonidine 2 micro g.kg-1) following the induction of a standardized sevoflurane based anaesthetic. Postoperative analgesia [maximum Objective Pain Scale (OPS) score and requirement for supplemental analgesia] and sedation (three-point scale) were assessed at predetermined intervals during the first 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Fourteen children in group I and nine children in group C did not require rescue analgesia (P = 0.17). No difference in maximum OPS scores could be detected between the two study groups. The mean time to full recovery regarding sedation was 149 min and 153 min in groups C and I, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates a trend for better postoperative analgesia following peripheral administration of clonidine compared with central application. However, the main mechanism for the adjunct analgesic effect of clonidine when administered together with local anaesthetics requires further study.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine whether caudal S-ketamine or clonidine prolonged analgesia together with ropivacaine. METHODS: Sixty-three boys, aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing minor surgery, were allocated in order to receive one of three solutions for caudal anaesthesia. Group R received 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine; group C, 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine + clonidine 2 microg x kg(-1); and group K, 2 mg x kg(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine + S-ketamine 0.5 mg x kg(-1). RESULTS: Postoperative analgesia assessed by CHEOPS lasted 701 min in group K (P < 0.05) compared with 492 min in group C and 291 min in group R. There were no significant differences between the groups for incidence of haemodynamic and respiratory alterations, motor block or sedation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that S-ketamine 0.5 mg x kg(-1) when added to 0.2% caudal ropivacaine provides better postoperative analgesia than clonidine without any clinically significant side-effect.
Abstract: We have compared the onset time, anesthetic potency and adverse effects of three local anaesthetics (ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and bupivacaine) in two type of peripheral blocks (brachial plexus block for upper limb and femoral nerve block for lower limb) in adult patients in a double blind, randomized, prospective study. A total of 66 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery were randomly allocated to receive brachial plexus block or femoral nerve blockade with 0,5% ropivacaine (group R, n=22), 0,5% levobupivacaine (group L, n=22) or 0,5% bupivacaine (group B, n=22), each groups has been divided into two subgroups (LBP n=11, RBP n=11, BPB n=11, LBF n=11, RBF n=11, BBF n=11) dipending on the type of block. The onset of sensory nerve block was similar for the three groups; the onset of motor block and onset time ready to surgery were faster in group R (-30%) if compared with group L and B. The duration of motor block and sensory block was respectively longer in group L and in group B. Study results have not been influenced by the blocks, except for plexus nerve block where we observed the same results for group B and group R in relation to onset time ready to surgery. VRS scores were higher in group R as showed by the number of analgesic request in postoperative period. We did not observe any adverse effect. We conclude that ropivacaine acts faster with less interpatient variability, while levobupivacaine and bupivacaine offer a prolonged postoperative analgesia. For this reason, with the exception of bupivacaine due to major cardio and neuro toxicity, we can indifferently use levobupivacaine or ropivacaine depending on the requested characteristics of the anesthetic.
Abstract: Epidurally administered clonidine enhances the quality and duration of postoperative analgesia when it is used as an adjunct to local anesthetics in children. We investigated the dose-response relationship for epidural clonidine when added to a continuous postoperative epidural infusion of ropivacaine. By use of an observer-blinded design, 55 pediatric patients (1-4 yr old) were randomly given a postoperative epidural infusion of plain ropivacaine 0.1% 0.2 mg. kg(-1). h(-1) (Group R), ropivacaine 0.08% 0.16 mg. kg(-1). h(-1) plus clonidine 0.04 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) (Group RC1), ropivacaine 0.08% 0.16 mg. kg(-1). h(-1) plus clonidine 0.08 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) (Group RC2), or ropivacaine 0.08% 0.16 mg. kg(-1). h(-1) plus clonidine 0.12 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) (Group RC3). A clear dose-response relationship could be identified for a continuous infusion of epidural clonidine, with clonidine dosages in the 0.08-0.12 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) range providing improved postoperative analgesia (reduced Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario pain score, increased time to first supplemental analgesic demand, and a reduced total number of doses of supplemental analgesics during the first 48 h after surgery). Analgesia was improved without any signs of increased sedation or other side effects. The adjunct use of epidural clonidine in the dosage range of 0.08-0.12 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) appears effective and safe for use in children. Implications: The addition of clonidine (0.08-0.12 microg.kg(-1).h(-1))to a continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine was found to improve postoperative pain relief in children. No clinically significant signs of sedation or other side effects were observed.
Abstract: Over the years paediatric regional anaesthesia has gained a worldwide consensus, and it can now be considered a significant part of perioperative pain control in children. As in many fields, with the use of drugs administered epidurally there is a fundamental need for safety and efficacy. Two new local anaesthetic agents have recently entered the market, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, which seem to offer a wider safety margin in comparison with the old drugs as well as valid pain control. To prolong their analgesic duration, many adjuvants can be used, and clonidine and ketamine are probably the best solution. This review summarizes the most recent data on these drugs and their use in children.
Abstract: Spinal anaesthesia, first introduced in children at beginning of 20th century, offers adequate intraoperative anaesthetic conditions (analgesia and muscle relaxation). The technique is easy to perform even if lumbar puncture is more difficult when the children is smaller. It has not been observed haemodynamic modifications especially in patients under 5 year of age; duration of spinal anaesthesia is shorter if compared to adults and post dural puncture headache (PDPH) after spinal anaesthesia is as common in children as it is in adults, but was usually mild and very short lasting. PDPH has not been correlated with the type of spinal needle used. Hyperbaric solution of local anaesthetics like bupivacaine and tetracaine are preferable. The only adjuvant used for spinal anesthesia in children is morphine, which should be administered only in patients admitted to high dependency unit in the postoperative period. Spinal anaesthesia is indicated mainly in sub umbilical surgical procedures lasting no more than 90 minutes and particularly in the surgical treatment of former premature infants who present an higher risk with regional anaesthesia.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Adding clonidine to weak ropivacaine solutions (<0.2%) could potentially enhance analgesia as well as further reduce the risk for unwanted motor blockade. The aim of the present study was to compare the postoperative pain-relieving quality of a ropivacaine 0.1%-clonidine mixture to that of plain ropivacaine 0.2% following caudal administration in children. METHODS: In a prospective, observer-blinded fashion, 40 ASA 1 paediatric patients undergoing subumbilical surgery were randomly allocated to receive a caudal injection of either plain ropivacaine 0.2% (1 ml/kg) (R0.2) or a mixture of ropivacaine 0.1% with clonidine 2 microg/kg (1 ml/kg) (R0.1C). Objective pain scale score and need for supplemental analgesia were used to evaluate analgesia during the first 24 h postoperatively. Residual postoperative sedation was also assessed. RESULTS: A significantly higher number of patients in the R0.1C group (18/20) could be managed without supplemental analgesia during the first 24 h postoperatively compared to the R0.2 group (11/20) (P=0.034). Both the degree and the duration of postoperative sedation was similar in both groups. No signs of postoperative motor blockade were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of clonidine (2 microg/kg) and ropivacaine 0.1% is associated with an improved quality of postoperative analgesia compared to plain 0.2% ropivacaine. The improved analgesic quality of the clonidine-ropivacaine mixture is achieved without causing any significant degree of postoperative sedation.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To assess and compare the onset time and duration of neuroblockade obtained after ropivacaine or bupivacaine in infants undergoing major abdominal surgery. We also evaluated the efficacy and safety of employing ropivacaine instead of bupivacaine to provide operative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. METHODS: In a prospective double blind study 28 infants, aged 1-12 months, undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, were randomly allocated to receive, after induction of general anesthesia, either 0.7 ml x kg(-1) bupivacaine 0.25% (group B) or ropivacaine 0.2% (group R) via lumbar epidural block. The onset time, total surgical time and duration of analgesia were recorded. RESULTS: No differences were noted in demographic data, hemodynamic variables or duration of surgery. The onset time for sensory blockade was 13.1 min +/- 2.1 (group B) and 11.7 +/- 2.4 min (group R). The duration of analgesia was 491 +/- 291 (group R) and 456 min +/- 247 (group B). Eight patients in group B and six in group R needed codeine and acetaminophen rescue on at least one occasion during the 24 hr study period. No major side effects were noted in either groups. CONCLUSIONS: In infants undergoing major abdominal surgery under combined epidural/light general anesthesia, ropivacaine 0.2% produces sensory and motor blockade similar in onset, duration of action and efficacy to that obtained from an equal volume, 0.7 ml x kg(-1), of bupivacaine 0.25%.
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The goal of the present investigation was to compare the double-segment and the needle-through-needle techniques for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSE) in a prospective, randomized, blinded study. METHODS: With Ethical Committee approval and patient's consent, 120 patients were randomized to receive CSE by the needle-through-needle (SST; n=60) or the double-segment technique (DST; n=60). A blind observer measured the time required from skin disinfection to readiness for surgery (loss of pinprick sensation up to T10), failure of dural puncture, need for epidural top-up before surgery, patient acceptance, and occurrence of complications. RESULTS: No neurologic complications were observed in either group. Time to readiness for surgery was 22.7+/-8.2 minutes in the SST group and 29.8+/-8.31 minutes in the DST one (P < .001). Dural puncture was unsuccessful in three patients in the SST group (5%) and in one patient in the DST group (1.6%) (ns); inadequate spread of spinal anesthesia was observed in five patients in the SST group (8.3%) and in eight patients in the DST group (13.3%) (ns). No difference in the incidence of hypotension, postdural puncture headache, and back pain was observed between the two groups. Acceptance of anesthetic procedure was better in the SST (85%) than in the DST group (66.6%) (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The needle-through-needle technique for CSE requires less time, has no greater failure rate, and results in greater patient satisfaction than the double-segment technique. The use of a spinal needle with an adjustable locking mechanism and protruding up to 15 mm beyond the Tuohy needle improved successful spinal block in the needle-through-needle technique compared with previous reports.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Clonidine, an alpha 2 agonist, is known to prolong the action of local anesthetics, and to provide a satisfactory analgesia; hypotension and bradycardia have been observed after its intrathecal administration. The aim of our study was to determine whether intrathecal administration of clonidine can reduce the dose of local anesthetic, and the effects of clonidine on the cardiovascular system, and on arousal level. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized study we evaluated 56 patients scheduled for minor surgical procedure (spermatic vein ligature) under unilateral spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 1%. One half of patients received clonidine (105 micrograms) in addition to bupivacaine. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate were recorded baseline until 1 hour after surgery. Cardiac output, stroke volume, ejection fraction, systemic vascular resistance and left cardiac work were measured, by thoracic electric bioimpedance method, baseline until 1 hour after surgery. Sensory block, motor block and sedation level were measured at the beginning of anesthesia and for 6 hours after the end of surgery. RESULTS: In the clonidine treated group we did not observe variations of cardiovascular parameters; in the same group we did observe sensory block and motor block significantly prolonged, a higher sedation level and a significant postoperative analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the addition of clonidine to hyperbaric bupivacaine seems to be particularly useful in unilateral spinal anesthesia, exerting minimal influence on haemodynamic parameters, and guaranting a satisfactory postoperative analgesia.
Abstract: In a double-blind study, 42 children, aged 1-10, undergoing general subumbilical surgery, were randomly allocated to two groups; they received, via caudal extradural, 1% mepivacaine 7 mg.kg-1 and normal saline 1 ml (Group 1) and a mixture of 1% mepivacaine 7 mg.kg-1 plus clonidine 2 micrograms.kg-1 and normal saline up to 1 ml (Group 2) respectively. No significant difference was noticed in age, weight, duration of surgery and onset time of anaesthesia, blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation. Mean duration of analgesia (evaluated with 'Broadman objective pain scale') was 143 min for Group 1 and 218 min for Group 2 (P < 0.05); the time of sedation (evaluated with a sedation score) was statistically longer in Group 2 (172 min vs 89 min in Group 1). This longer sedation is due both to the longer analgesia and partially to a side effect of clonidine. In conclusion the addition of 2 micrograms.kg-1 of clonidine to mepivacaine prolongs the duration of caudal analgesia in children.
Abstract: Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has recently obtained a wide diffusion in paediatrics, thanks to the pharmacological properties of propofol. The authors make a review on sedation, combined anaesthesia and Tiva in paediatric anesthesia, particularly on propofol and its characteristics. They describe the practical use of TIVA with recent knowledge in this field.
Abstract: The Authors describe a case of HELLP syndrome associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred after delivery in a patient with late hypertension without any sign or symptom of preeclampsia during pregnancy. The use of plasma exchange has contributed to the recovery from the pathology.
