Fernando Fonseca

Abstract:

Abstract: Theoretical concerns about the use of cemented or press-fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include stress shielding with adverse effects on prosthesis fixation. Revision TKA components are commonly stemmed to protect the limited autogenous bone stock remaining. Revision procedures with the use of stems can place abnormal stresses through even normal bone by their constrained design, type of materials and fixation method and may contribute for bone loss. Experimental quantification of strain shielding in the proximal synthetic tibia following TKA is the main purpose of the present study. In this study, cortical bone strains were measured experimentally with tri-axial strain gauges in synthetic tibias before and after in vitro knee surgery. Three tibias were implanted with cemented and press-fit stem augments and solely with a tibial tray (short monobloc stem) of the P.F.C. Sigma Modular Knee System. The difference between principal strains of the implanted and the intact tibia was calculated for each strain gauge position. The results demonstrated a pronounced strain-shielding effect in the proximal level, close to tibial tray with the cemented stem augment. The press-fit stem presented a minor effect of strain shielding but was more extensively throughout the stem. An increase of strains closely to the distal tip of the cemented and the press-fit stem augment was observed. This suggests for a physiological condition, a potential effect of bone resorption at the proximal region for the cemented stem augment. The localized increase of strains in stems tip can be related with the clinical finding of the pain, at the end of stem after revision TKA.

Abstract: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) changes mechanical loading of the knee joint. Bone loss in the tibia is commonly encountered at the time of the revision TKA. Restoration of lost bone support and joint stability are the primary challenges in revision TKA. Normally, these defects are treated with non-living structures like metallic augments or bone grafts (autografts or allografts). Alone, neither of these structures can provide the initial support and stability for revision implants. In the latter, the use of intramedullary stems can provide the necessary load sharing and protect the remaining host bone and graft from excessive stress, increasing component stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate comparatively load sharing (cortical rim, cancellous bone and stem) and stability at the cement–bone interface under the tibial tray induced by the use of cemented and press-fit tibial component stem extensions. Furthermore the study of the desirable option in cases where the bone defect is cavitary (cancellous bone defect contained by an intact cortical rim) or uncontained bone defect (bone loss involving the supporting cortical rim) was carried out. Because in vitro evaluation of these biomechanical parameters is difficult we used finite element (FE) models to overcome this. The biomechanical results suggest an identical behaviour in case of cavitary defects for both

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract: Finite Element (FE) models for the simulation of intact and implanted bone find their main purpose in accurately reproducing the associated mechanical behavior. FE models can be used for preclinical testing of joint replacement implants, where some biomechanical aspects are difficult, if not possible, to simulate and investigate in vitro. To predict mechanical failure or damage, the models should accurately predict stresses and strains. Commercially available synthetic femur models have been extensively used to validate finite element models, but despite the vast literature available on the characteristics of synthetic tibia, numerical and experimental validation of the intact and implant assemblies of tibia are very limited or lacking. In the current study, four FE models of synthetic tibia, intact and reconstructed, were compared against experimental bone strain data, and an overall agreement within 10% between experimental and FE strains was obtained. Finite element and experimental (strain gauge) models of intact and implanted synthetic tibia were validated based on the comparison of cortex bone strains. The study also includes the analysis carried out on standard tibial components with cemented and noncemented stems of the P.F.C Sigma Modular Knee System. The overall agreement within 10% previously established was achieved, indicating that FE models could be successfully validated. The obtained results include a statistical analysis where the root-mean-square-error values were always <10%. FE models can successfully reproduce bone strains under most relevant acting loads upon the condylar surface of the tibia. Moreover, FE models, once properly validated, can be used for preclinical testing of tibial knee replacement, including misalignment of the implants in the proximal tibia after surgery, simulation of long-term failure according to the damage accumulation failure scenario, and other related biomechanical aspects.

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract: