hosted by
publicationslist.org
    

Rowland J.V. Cole


rjvcole@yahoo.co.uk

Journal articles

2013
2012
Rowland JV Cole (2012)  Validating the Normative Value and Legal Recognition of the Principle of Equality of Arms in Criminal Proceedings in Botswana   Journal of African Law 52: 1. 94-114  
Abstract: The principle of equality of arms is firmly entrenched in the jurisprudence of international tribunals, but hardly at all in domestic systems. This article argues for the principle to be applied in Botswana's adversarial system, as a way of ensuring procedural equality and enhancing fair trials. After examining the normative value of the principle, the article refers to a number of domestic jurisdictions that have applied the principle. It also examines the general acceptability of equality and fairness in Botswana case law. This represents a foundation for applying the principle in Botswana. The principle was developed by the European Court of Human Rights, creating its own concept of fairness in trials, irrespective of the position in domestic systems. Since the principle is of international origin, it is necessary to note that “judicial territoriality” and Botswana's dualist system do not pose obstacles to the application of the principle.
Notes:
2011
2010
Rowland Cole (2010)  Between Judicial Enabling and Adversarialism: The Role of the Judicial Officer in Protecting the Unrepresented Accused in Botswana in A Comparative Perspective   University of Botswana Law Journal 11: 81-115  
Abstract: The role of the judicial officer in Botswana’s adversarial system has evolved over the decades. Traditionally, the judicial officer in the adversarial system plays a neutral role while the parties present their cases. The semblance of neutrality compels the judicial officer to remain passive and refrain from interfering with the process. Over the years, the courts have recognised that the unrepresented accused cannot get a fair trial as she is unaware of the rules of procedure and evidence. This being the case, the unrepresented accused cannot effectively participate in the proceedings. Consequently, the courts have over the years stated that judicial officers have a duty to assist unrepresented accused persons. This position was recently given added impetus by the Court of Appeal. This article discusses the duty of the judicial officer to the unrepresented accused and its implications for Botswana’s adversarial system. In so doing, comparative analysis is made with Australia, South Africa and to some extent Namibia, which share similar (adversarial common law) systems with Botswana.
Notes:
2008
2007
2000
1998

Book chapters

2010
Powered by PublicationsList.org.