Abstract: Three experiments examined anisotropies of tolerance of perceptual completion at the blind spot when a pair of line segments was presented on opposite sides of the blind spot. The tolerance of perceptual completion is defined as the maximum difference in a stimulus attribute between the line segments on opposite sides of the blind spot when perceptual completion of a line has occurred. The misalignment, orientation difference, and luminance difference between the line segments were used as the stimulus attributes in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The results showed anisotropies of the tolerance of perceptual completion between horizontal and vertical configurations of the line segments. Vertical superiorities, which imply a greater extent of tolerance in the vertical configuration than that in the horizontal configuration, were observed for misalignment and orientation difference, while horizontal superiority, which implies a greater extent of tolerance in the horizontal configuration than that in the vertical configuration, was observed for luminance difference. We discussed possible origins of the anisotropy of the tolerance of perceptual completion at the blind spot.
Abstract: An external noise technique was used to investigate the stereoscopic process that generates an illusory phantom occluder from binocularly unmatched elements. Observers were required to identify the quadrant in which a binocularly defined target was presented. We had three targets: (a) two vertical binocular bars with the unmatched portions arranged to induce a stable phantom occluder (valid), (b) the same stimuli except the image for the left eye was switched with that for the right eye therefore not inducing a stable occluder (invalid), and (c) a single binocular bar with the same unmatched portion (single-bar). For each target, the luminance contrast of the signal required for 75% correct responses was measured at four levels of external interocular noise. Contrast thresholds were found to be lower for the valid target than for both the invalid and the single-bar targets. The results suggest that the visual system has a stereoscopic detector that responds to stimuli that meet a long-distance requirement for the perception of partially occluding surfaces.
Abstract: The present study aimed to investigate whether the visual system scales apparent depth from binocularly unmatched features by using absolute distance information. In Experiment 1 we examined the effect of convergence on perceived depth in phantom stereograms [Gillam, B., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone. Vision Research, 39, 109-112.], monocular gap stereograms [Pianta, M. J., & Gillam, B. J. (2003a). Monocular gap stereopsis: manipulation of the outer edge disparity and the shape of the gap. Vision Research, 43, 1937-1950.] and random dot stereograms. In Experiments 2 and 3 we examined the effective range of viewing distances for scaling the apparent depths in these stereograms. The results showed that: (a) the magnitudes of perceived depths increased in all stereograms as the estimate of the viewing distance increased while keeping proximal and/or distal sizes of the stimuli constant, and (b) the effective range of viewing distances was significantly shorter in monocular gap stereograms. The first result indicates that the visual system scales apparent depth from unmatched features as well as that from horizontal disparity, while the second suggests that, at far distances, the strength of the depth signal from an unmatched feature in monocular gap stereograms is relatively weaker than that from horizontal disparity.
Abstract: Emmert's law and the size-distance invariance hypothesis have been said to be formally equivalent, provided that Emmert's law means that the perceived size of an afterimage is proportional to the perceived distance of the projected surface of the afterimage. However, there have been very few studies that have attempted to verify this formal equivalence empirically. We measured both the perceived size and distance of afterimages and real objects with the same proximal size. Nineteen participants projected afterimages of 1 deg in visual angle on the wall located at distances of 1 to 23 meters from the participants. They also observed real objects, disc-shaped and made from a sheet of Styrofoam board, with the same proximal size as that of the afterimages, which were located at the same physical distances as those of the wall on which the afterimages were projected. Each participant reproduced the apparent sizes of the afterimages and real objects using the reproduction method and estimated the apparent distances using the magnitude estimation method. When the mean apparent sizes of the afterimages and real objects, represented as a function of apparent distance, were fitted to a linear function, the slopes for the afterimages and real objects did not differ significantly. These results are interpreted as evidence for the formal equivalence of Emmert's law and the size-distance invariance hypothesis.
Abstract: To clarify whether stereo-slant aftereffects are independent of stimulated retinal position, two experiments compared the magnitude of aftereffects between the following two conditions: when the adaptation and test stimulus fell on (1) the same retinal position, and (2) on different retinal positions separated by 0.5 degrees -20 degrees . In Experiment 1, disc- or ring-shaped surface consisting of random-dots was presented at the central or peripheral visual fields. In Experiment 2, rectangular surface was presented at the upper or lower visual fields. After two minutes inspection of a random-dot stereogram depicting a +/-30 degrees slanted surface, the observer adjusted the slant of the test stimulus to appear fronto-parallel. The results of the experiments showed that significant aftereffects were observed similarly in both conditions. Moreover, the separation nor the stimulus shape scarcely affected the magnitude of the aftereffects. Based on these results we concluded that the depth processing mechanism which operates independently from the stimulated retinal position is responsible for the depth aftereffects we found.
Abstract: A visual search task was used to investigate the spatially parallel coding of depth from binocular disparity and from binocularly unmatched features. Experiment 1, using disparity noise, showed that detectability is higher for illusory phantom targets defined by unmatched features than for disparity-defined targets, although the two targets were equated as to theoretically minimum depth. Experiment 2, using binocularly unmatched noise whose width was equal to the disparity of the noise used in Experiment 1, showed that noise severely interferes with the detection of both the disparity and the phantom targets. These results are consistent with the idea that the greater depth seen with phantom stereopsis is coded at the early stages of visual processing.
Abstract: An object phenomenally shrinks in its horizontal dimension when shown on a 2-D plane as if the central portion of the object were partially occluded by another vertical one in 3-D space (the Kanizsa amodal shrinkage). We examined the predictions of the correcting-mechanism hypothesis proposed by Ohtsuka and Ono (2002, Proceedings of SPIE 4864 167-174), which states that an inappropriate operation of the mechanism that corrects a phenomenal increase in monocularly visible areas accompanied by a stereoscopic occluder gives rise to the illusion. In this study we measured the perceived width (or height in experiment 3) of a square seen behind a rectangle, while controlling other factors which potentially influence the illusion, such as the division of space or depth stratification. The results of five experiments showed that (a) the perceived width was not influenced when the occluder had a relatively large binocular disparity, but was underestimated when the occluder did not have disparity, and (b) the shrinkage diminished when the foreground rectangle was transparent, was horizontally oriented, or contained no pictorial occlusion cues. These results support the hypothesis that the correcting mechanism, triggered by pictorial occlusion cues, contributes to the Kanizsa shrinkage.
Abstract: Two experiments examined which of two mechanisms, attention shift or memory averaging, reduces foveal bias. The target stimulus was a black dot presented for 80 ms while observers maintained fixation. The two main conditions were 'with' and 'without' vertical and horizontal bars as landmarks, which were placed on more eccentric positions than the target stimulus. To induce attention, the landmark was flashed on for 80 ms (Experiment 1) or disappeared (Experiment 2) with a stimulus onset asynchrony of 0, 106.4, or 212.8 ms in both experiments. As a control, non-flashed and non-disappeared landmark conditions were employed. The observers' task was to point to the remembered location of the target with a mouse cursor. The results showed that the magnitudes of foveal bias were significantly lower in the flashed and disappeared landmark conditions than in the without landmark condition. Furthermore, the magnitudes in the flashed and disappeared landmark conditions did not differ from their respective control conditions. The latter finding in the disappeared landmark conditions provides evidence for 'attention shift' against 'memory averaging' as the mechanism reducing foveal bias.
Abstract: We investigated the effects of spatial and temporal factors on manual localization of a visual target by measuring accuracy, precision, and bias. Spatial factors included manipulation of display as with or without distracters, with invariant or variant distracters, and with near or far distracters, respectively, in Experiments 1, 2, and 3. The target and distracters were of 1degrees dots differing only by luminance parameter; they were presented concurrently for 150 or 1000 ms while observers had to memorize the target location maintaining a fixed gaze. The observers' task was to reproduce the location of the target with a mouse cursor available 150 ms following stimuli offset. Results from all experiments showed that localization performance for a briefly exposed target was as accurate and precise as that for a long exposed target. Moreover, manipulation of spatial factors had no systematic effects on accuracy and precision except that near distracters yielded higher precision. Interestingly, localization performance was unbiased in 150 ms condition when there were distracters in the display, while being biased towards the fovea in 1000 ms condition regardless of their presence or absence. These results suggest a temporal dynamics in dominance-suppression between egocentric and exocentric cues in the construction of memory for location.
Abstract: We examined Emmert's law by measuring the perceived size of an afterimage and the perceived distance of the surface on which the afterimage was projected in actual and virtual environments. The actual environment consisted of a corridor with ample cues as to distance and depth. The virtual environment was made from the CAVE of a virtual reality system. The afterimage, disc-shaped and one degree in diameter, was produced by flashing with an electric photoflash. The observers were asked to estimate the perceived distance to surfaces located at various physical distances (1 to 24 m) by the magnitude estimation method and to estimate the perceived size of the afterimage projected on the surfaces by a matching method. The results show that the perceived size of the afterimage was directly proportional to the perceived distance in both environments; thus, Emmert's law holds in virtual as well as actual environments. We suggest that Emmert's law is a specific case of a functional principle of distance scaling by the visual system.
Abstract: When observers binocularly fixate on an inclined sheet of paper with equally spaced dots, an apparent "staircase" is seen. We varied the inclination of the sheet, the spacing among the dots, and the viewing distance. The results indicate that (1) as the space and the inclination decreased, the number of apparent steps increased and the height of apparent steps decreased, and (2) as the distance and the inclination increased, the number of apparent steps decreased, and eventually the illusion disappeared. The nearest-neighbor rule and the extent of the vertical horopter inclination explain the characteristics of the illusion.
Abstract: We examined effects of binocular occlusion, binocular camouflage, and vergence-induced disparity cues on the perceived depth between two objects when two stimuli are presented to one eye and a single stimulus to the other (Wheatstone-Panum limiting case). The perceived order and magnitude of the depth were examined in two experimental conditions: (1) The stimulus was presented on the temporal side (occlusion condition) and (2) the nasal side (camouflage condition) of the stimulus pair on one retina so as to fuse with the single stimulus on the other retina. In both conditions, the separation between the stimulus pair presented to one eye was systematically varied. Experiment 1, with 16 observers, showed that the fused object was seen in front of the nonfused object in the occlusion condition and was seen at the same distance as the nonfused object in the camouflage condition. The perceived depth between the two objects was constant and did not depend on the separation of the stimulus pair presented to one eye. Experiment 2, with 45 observers, showed that the disparity induced by vergence mainly determined the perceived depth, and the depth magnitude increased as the separation of the stimulus pair was made wider. The results suggest that (1) occlusion provides depth-order information but not depth-magnitude information, (2) camouflage provides neither depth-order nor depth-magnitude information, and (3) vergence-induced disparity provides both order and magnitude information.
Abstract: Visual directions of the two stimuli in Panum's limiting case with different interstimulus and convergence distances confirmed the predictions from the reformulated Wells-Hering's laws of visual direction. In experiment 1, six observers each converged on the midpoint of the interstimulus axis at 30, 60, and 90 cm from the eyes and adjusted a probe on the fixation plane to be in the same visual direction as that of each stimulus. Visual direction of the far stimulus was always nonveridical whereas that of the near stimulus was veridical only when its retinal disparity was small. In experiment 2, three observers each converged on the intersection of mid-sagittal plane and (a) the frontoparallel plane of the near stimulus, (b) that of the midpoint between the two stimuli, or (c) that of the far stimulus. The midpoint of the interstimulus axis was 60 cm from the eyes. Visual direction of the far stimulus was veridical only with convergence at the far plane. Visual direction of the near stimulus was veridical with convergence at the near plane, and also, only when its retinal disparity was small, with convergence at the two other planes.
