I am PhD student at IPATIMUP (Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto) at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
My current research focuses on molecular characterization of microsatellite stable and microsatellite unstable colorectal tumours and also on the determination of signalling pathways, namely those activated by oncogenes involved in the development/progression of these two types of colorectal tumours.
Abstract: BRAF kinase is a downstream target of KRAS and activates the MAPK pathway. These two molecules are prone to mutations in sporadic microsatellite unstable (MSI) colorectal carcinomas (CRC) and BRAF(V600E) mutations are inversely associated with oncogenic KRAS mutations. The biological significance of BRAF(V600E) oncogenic activation is not well established in this type of tumour. We aimed to study proliferation and survival effects induced by BRAF inhibition in MSI CRC cell lines harbouring distinct genetic backgrounds (BRAF(V600E) or KRAS(G13D)). Suppression of BRAF in BRAF(V600E) MSI CRC cell lines by RNA interference significantly inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis, as demonstrated by BrdU incorporation and TUNEL assay, respectively. No significant differences were seen in proliferation and apoptosis, in cell lines harbouring KRAS(G13D), after BRAF inhibition. We further analysed proliferation-associated molecules (pERK1/2, cyclin D1, p27(Kip1)) and apoptosis-associated molecules (Bcl-2, Bax, pAkt, pBad, XIAP) in all cell lines. After BRAF down-regulation, we found a more pronounced decrease in ERK1/2 phosphorylation and cyclin D1 expression levels in BRAF-mutated cell lines in comparison to KRAS mutated cells. Upon BRAF inhibition, we also found an increase in p27(Kip1) levels and a more pronounced decrease in the levels of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, specifically in cell lines with BRAF(V600E). In conclusion, we have shown that MSI KRAS and BRAF mutant CRC cell lines respond differently to BRAF knockdown. This report provides evidence supporting BRAF as a good target for therapeutic intervention in patients with sporadic MSI CRC harbouring activating mutations in BRAF but not in KRAS. Copyright (c) 2007 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract: In sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), KRAS are alternative to BRAF mutations and occur, respectively, in 30 and 10% of cases. Few reports addressed the association between KRAS-BRAF mutations and tumour progression specifically in sporadic microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRC. We screened KRAS and BRAF in 250 MSS primary CRC and 45 lymph node (LN) metastases and analysed the pathological features of the cases to understand the involvement of KRAS-BRAF activation in progression and metastasis. Forty-five per cent of primary MSS CRCs carried mutations in at least one of these genes and mutations were associated with wall invasion (P=0.02), presence and number of LN metastases (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively), distant metastases (P=0.004) and advanced stage (P=0.01). We demonstrated that KRAS and BRAF are alternative events in Tis and T1 MSS CRC and, KRAS rather than BRAF mutations, contributed to the progression of MSS CRC. The frequency of KRAS and/or BRAF mutations was higher in LN metastases than in primary carcinomas (P=0.0002). Mutated LN metastases displayed KRAS associated or not with BRAF mutations. BRAF mutations were never present as a single event. Concomitant KRAS and BRAF mutations increased along progression of MSS CRCs, suggesting that activation of both genes is likely to harbour a synergistic effect.
Abstract: The EPH/EFN family of receptor tyrosine kinases regulates cell adhesion and migration and has an important role in controlling cell positioning in the normal intestinal epithelium. Inactivation of EPHB2 has recently been shown to accelerate tumorigenesis in the colon and rectum, and we have previously demonstrated frequent frameshift mutations (41%) in an A9 coding microsatellite repeat in exon 17 of EPHB2 in colorectal tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI). In this study, we extended these analyses to extracolonic MSI cancers, and found frameshift EPHB2 mutations in 39% (25/64) of gastric tumors and 14% (8/56) of endometrial tumors. Regression analysis of these EPHB2 mutation data on the basis of our previously proposed statistical model identified EPHB2 as a selective target of frameshift mutations in MSI gastric cancers but not in MSI endometrial carcinomas. These results suggest a functional role for EPHB2 in gastric tumor progression, and emphasize the differences between the tumorigenic processes in MSI gastrointestinal and endometrial cancer.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mdm2 is a natural inhibitor of p53 function and its overexpression impairs p53 transcriptional activity. T-->G single-nucleotide polymorphism at position 309 (SNP309) of mdm2 induces overexpression of mdm2, but inhibits p53. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether SNP309 is a risk-modifier polymorphism in colorectal cancer (CRC) and whether tumour selection of P53 mutations are influenced by SNP309. METHODS: Single-stranded conformation polymorphism and automatic sequencing were performed. RESULTS: SNP309 is not associated with the risk of CRC or recurrence of tumours. These data do not over-ride the tumour-selection capabilities of P53 mutations in CRC. However, a significant association with non-dominant-negative P53 mutations (p = 0.02) was found. CONCLUSIONS: MDM2-SNP309 favours tumour selection of non-dominant negative P53 mutations in CRC, which also show an earlier age of tumour onset.
Abstract: c-KIT is a tyrosine kinase receptor found to be overexpressed in several tumours, namely, GISTs, breast, lung, prostate, ovarian and colorectal carcinomas (CRC). We aimed at determining the frequency of c-KIT expression and mutations in a series of 109 CRC cases (73 primary tumours and 36 lymph node metastases) characterised for KRAS and BRAF mutations. We also aimed at analysing the cellular effects of STI571/Gleevec in CRC-derived cell lines displaying c-KIT expression and KRAS or BRAF mutations. By immunohistochemistry, we found c-KIT overexpression in 15% (11/73) of primary tumours and in 14% (5/36) of metastasis; however, cases showing overexpression did not show c-kit mutations in hotspot regions. The majority (64%) of primary tumours with c-KIT overexpression had mutations at KRAS-BRAF genes. The same was true for 60% of the metastases. We treated CRC cell lines with STI571/Gleevec and verified that it inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in all cell lines. In conclusion, overexpression of c-KIT is observed in a subset of primary and CRC metastases in the absence of c-kit mutations. STI571/Gleevec increases apoptosis in CRC cell lines independently of its genetic profile, suggesting that STI571/Gleevec is likely to be an alternative drug for the clinical trials of CRC.
Abstract: Objective: Our aim was to characterize the molecular and genotypic profile of eight thyroid carcinoma-derived cell lines-TPC1, FB2, B-CPAP, K1, XTC-1, C643, 8505C, and Hth74-in order to use them as in vitro models of thyroid carcinogenesis. Design: We evaluated the expression of five thyroid-specific genes (Tg, TSHr, TPO, PAX8, and TTF-1) to establish the cell lineage and to assess the differentiation status of each of the cell lines. We screened for mutations in the most relevant oncogenes/tumor suppressor genes affected in thyroid carcinogenesis: RAS, BRAF, CTNNB1, and TP53 along with RET/PTC rearrangements. Considering the putative relevance in general carcinogenesis, we have also studied other molecules such as EGFR, PI3K, RAF-1, and THRB. To determine the genetic identity of the cell lines, we performed genotypic analysis. Main outcome: The panel of cell lines we have studied displayed activation of several oncogenes (BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC) and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (TP53) known to be important for thyroid carcinogenesis. Two of the cell lines-TPC1 and FB2-shared the same genotypic profile, probably representing clones of an ancestor cell line (TPC1). Conclusion: Due to their different molecular alterations, these cell lines represent a valuable tool to study the molecular mechanisms underlying thyroid carcinogenesis. We suggest that genotypic analyses should be included as a routine procedure to guarantee the uniqueness of each cell line used in research.
Abstract: A wide variety of tumours show PIK3CA mutations leading to increased phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) activity. We have determined the frequency of PIK3CA mutations in exons 9 and 20 that has previously been reported as mutational hotspot regions in distinct tumour models. One hundred and fifty gastrointestinal carcinomas (47 gastric and 103 colorectal) that were characterised for MSI status (76 MSI and 74 MSS) by PCR-SSCP sequencing were evaluated. We also analysed the association between PIK3CA mutations and KRAS or BRAF mutations. PIK3CA mutations in exons 9 and 20 were present in 13.6% and 10.6% of colorectal and gastric carcinomas, respectively. No differences in frequency and type of PIK3CA mutations were found between MSI and MSS colorectal carcinomas. All gastric carcinomas with PIK3CA mutations were MSI. The number of cases harbouring concomitant PIK3CA and KRAS or BRAF mutations was higher in colorectal than in gastric carcinomas (P = 0.016). In colorectal carcinoma, PIK3CA mutations occur preferentially together with activating KRAS-BRAF mutations (MSI and MSS) while in gastric carcinomas PIK3CA mutations tend to occur as isolated events (MSI).
Abstract: Methylation-associated inactivation of RASSF1A has frequently been observed in several human malignancies including sporadic colorectal and gastric cancer. However, nothing is known about the RASSF1A methylation status in the setting of MMR-deficient gastrointestinal tumours. In this study, we analysed systematically alterations in KRAS, BRAF and RASSF1A, in order to define the frequency and the pattern of these genetic/epigenetic alterations in three distinct subsets of MSI gastrointestinal tumours. Further, an association study was performed between RASSF1A methylation and the clinicopathological parameters in order to determine the profile of tumours harbouring this epigenetic event. A total of 56 MSI sporadic gastrointestinal tumours (31 colorectal and 25 gastric) and 20 MSI HNPCC analysed for KRAS/BRAF were analysed for RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation by MSP and DNA sequencing. No significant differences were found between the frequency of RASSF1A methylation in sporadic MSI colorectal and gastric carcinomas and HNPCC carcinomas (P=0.31). Methylation of RASSF1A was present in 16 of 31 (52%) sporadic MSI colorectal and 11 of 25 (44%) MSI gastric carcinomas, and in six of 20 (30%) HNPCC carcinomas. Nearly 36% of MSI sporadic colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) had RASSF1A methylation and activating mutations at KRAS and/or BRAF. In contrast, only 10 and 8% of HNPCC and sporadic gastric carcinomas, respectively, had concomitant KRAS mutations and RASSF1A methylation. The MSI sporadic gastric and CRCs with RASSF1A methylation were preferentially poorly differentiated (P=0.03, 0.05, respectively). We show that the profile of alterations RASSF1A, KRAS/BRAF is different among the three groups of MSI gastrointestinal tumours. Further, we demonstrate that MSI sporadic CRCs accumulated significantly more epigenetic/genetic alterations in RASSF1A, KRAS/BRAF than MSI sporadic gastric or HNPCC carcinomas (P=0.016). These results are likely to have therapeutic implications in the near future, due to the possibilities of using specific kinase inhibitors alone or in association with demethylating agents in MSI tumour types harbouring KRAS or BRAF mutations and RASSF1A methylation.
Abstract: In sporadic colorectal tumours the BRAFV600E is associated with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and inversely associated to KRAS mutations. Tumours from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients carrying germline mutations in hMSH2 or hMLH1 do not show BRAFV600E, however no consistent data exist regarding KRAS mutation frequency and spectrum in HNPCC tumours. We investigated KRAS in 158 HNPCC tumours from patients with germline hMLH1, hMSH2 or hMSH6 mutations, 166 MSI-H and 688 microsatellite stable (MSS) sporadic carcinomas. All tumours were characterized for MSI and 81 of 166 sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancer (CRCs) were analysed for hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation. KRAS mutations were observed in 40% of HNPCC tumours, and the mutation frequency varied upon the mismatch repair gene affected: 48% (29/61) in hMSH2, 32% (29/91) in hMLH1 and 83% (5/6) in hMSH6 (P = 0.01). KRAS mutation frequency was different between HNPCC, MSS and MSI-H CRCs (P = 0.002), and MSI-H with hMLH1 hypermethylation (P = 0.005). Furthermore, HNPCC CRCs had more G13D mutations than MSS (P < 0.0001), MSI-H (P = 0.02) or MSI-H tumours with hMLH1 hypermethylation (P = 0.03). HNPCC colorectal and sporadic MSI-H tumours without hMLH1 hypermethylation shared similar KRAS mutation frequency, in particular G13D. In conclusion, we show that depending on the genetic/epigenetic mechanism leading to MSI-H, the outcome in terms of oncogenic activation may be different, reinforcing the idea that HNPCC, sporadic MSI-H (depending on the hMLH1 status) and MSS CRCs, may target distinct kinases within the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway.
