Abstract: PURPOSE: Propofol neurotoxicity has been demonstrated in several cell culture systems. This study was undertaken to determine whether propofol has neurotoxic effects on peripheral, retinal, and autonomic neurons, and which neurons are particularly liable to injury by propofol. METHOD: Dorsal root ganglia, retinal ganglion cell layers, and sympathetic ganglion chains were isolated from day eight chick embryos and cultured for 20 hr. Thereafter, propofol was added at various concentrations [5-300 microM (0.9-53 microg x mL(-1))] to investigate its effects on these three types of neuronal tissue. Morphological changes were examined quantitatively by growth cone collapse assay. Propofol concentrations were measured using high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Propofol induced growth cone collapse and neurite destruction. The three types of neurons tested exhibited significantly different dose-response relationships two hours after the application of propofol (P < 0.001) but not at 24 hr after application. The growth cone-collapsing effect was at least partially reversible in all three types of neurons after exposure to 100 microM propofol up to six hours, though reversibility was not observed after 24-hr exposure. CONCLUSION: While the clinical safety profile of propofol has been well documented, at high concentrations propofol has potential neurotoxicity on growing neurons in vitro

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Propofol is commonly used for anesthesia and sedation in intensive care units. Approximately 53% of injected propofol is excreted in the urine as the glucuronide and 38% as hydroxylated metabolites. Liver, kidneys and intestine are suspected as clearance tissues. We investigated the contribution of the liver and kidneys to propofol metabolism in humans using an in vitro-in vivo scale up approach. METHODS: Renal tissue was obtained from five patients who received nephrectomies. Each renal hydroxylation and glucuronidation enzymatic activities in microsomal fractions from patients were performed discretely and their estimation based on the decrease of propofol concentration. Hepatic hydroxylation and glucuronidation activities were also performed separately using human liver microsomes. This estimation is based on the decrease of propofol concentration, assuming that the contribution of hydroxylation activity without NADPH-generating system and glucuronidation activity without UDPGA in each microsomal fraction are negligible. Both renal and hepatic clearances were estimated assuming a well-stirred model. RESULTS: Enzymatic activity of propofol oxidation in renal microsomes was negligible. Although glucuronidation activity in microsomes from kidneys was comparable to that from liver, the hepatic intrinsic clearance predicted from in vitro study was higher than that in kidneys due to the larger tissue volume and higher protein concentration. However, glucuronidation clearance in kidney is relatively similar to that in liver because of blood flow limitation of clearance in both tissues. CONCLUSION: The high degree of hydroxylation activity in liver microsomes is consistent with the blood flow-limited hepatic clearance of propofol. Although the activity of propofol glucuronidation in liver is higher, glucuronidation in kidney may be a substantial contributor.